Literature DB >> 24247790

Friendship network characteristics and psychological well-being in late adolescence: exploring differences by gender and gender composition.

Ylva B Almquist1, Viveca Östberg, Mikael Rostila, Christofer Edling, Jens Rydgren.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of the present study was to examine the association between friendship networks and psychological well-being among 19-year-olds.
METHODS: The data used was a random sample of Swedish individuals born in 1990 who answered a questionnaire in 2009-2010. Friendship networks were considered in terms of three measures of emotional support. Six statements about the individual's emotional state were used to create a summary measure of psychological well-being. Gender and gender composition were included as potentially moderating factors. The association between friendship networks and psychological well-being was analysed by means of linear regression analysis (n = 1289).
RESULTS: The results indicate that males' and females' friendship networks were similar with regard to quality and trust, whereas males' networks were characterized by less self-disclosure and a stronger preference for same-gender friendships. Gender composition did not matter for the support levels. Emotional support was associated with psychological well-being but there were gender differences: females seemed to benefit more health-wise from having high-quality (and trusting) networks. Moreover, whereas self-disclosure among males was positively linked to well-being, this was not the case among females. None of these associations were moderated by gender composition.
CONCLUSIONS: In sum, friendship networks are beneficial for the psychological well-being among late adolescents, but there are some important differences according to gender.

Keywords:  Emotional support; friendship; gender differences; late adolescence; psychological well-being; social networks

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24247790     DOI: 10.1177/1403494813510793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  8 in total

1.  The Protective Role of Friendship Quality on the Wellbeing of Adolescents Victimized by Peers.

Authors:  Olga Cuadros; Christian Berger
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-05-26

2.  The Roles of Social Media Use and Friendship Quality in Adolescents' Internalizing Problems and Well-being.

Authors:  Chantie Charissa Luijten; Daphne van de Bongardt; Anna Petra Nieboer
Journal:  J Happiness Stud       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Friendship networks and psychological well-being from late adolescence to young adulthood: a gender-specific structural equation modeling approach.

Authors:  Alexander Miething; Ylva B Almquist; Viveca Östberg; Mikael Rostila; Christofer Edling; Jens Rydgren
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2016-07-11

4.  Social relationships among adolescents as described in an electronic diary: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Katriina I Anttila; Minna J Anttila; Marjo H Kurki; Maritta A Välimäki
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Intergenerational patterns of mental health problems: the role of childhood peer status position.

Authors:  Evelina Landstedt; Ylva B Almquist
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Investigating the effect of social networking site use on mental health in an 18-34 year-old general population; a cross-sectional study using the 2016 Scania Public Health Survey.

Authors:  Emily Stella Scott; Catarina Canivet; Per-Olof Östergren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: the role of resilience beyond fluid intelligence and personality traits.

Authors:  Annamaria Di Fabio; Letizia Palazzeschi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-11

8.  Associations between the structural and functional aspects of social relations and poor mental health: a cross-sectional register study.

Authors:  Lise Røntved Hansen; Stinna Bibi Pedersen; Charlotte Overgaard; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Line Rosenkilde Ullits
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.