| Literature DB >> 28280307 |
Katriina I Anttila1, Minna J Anttila2, Marjo H Kurki2, Maritta A Välimäki3.
Abstract
Social relationships among adolescents with mental disorders are demanding. Adolescents with depressive symptoms may have few relationships and have difficulties sharing their problems. Internet may offer reliable and easy to use tool to collect real-time information from adolescents. The aim of this study is to explore how adolescents describe their social relationships with an electronic diary. Mixed methods were used to obtain a broad picture of adolescents' social relationships with the data gathered from network maps and reflective texts written in an electronic diary. Adolescents who visited an outpatient clinic and used an intervention (N=70) designed for adolescents with signs of depression were invited to use the electronic diary; 29 did so. The quantitative data gathered in the electronic diary were summarized with descriptive statistics, and the qualitative data were categorized using a thematic analysis with an inductive approach. We found that social relationships among adolescents with signs of depression can vary greatly in regards to the number of existing relationships (from lacking to 21) and the quality of the relationships (from trustful to difficult). However, the relationships may change, and the adolescents are also willing to build up their social relationships. Professionals need to be aware of the diversity of adolescents' social relationships and their need for personalized support.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent; depression; electronic diary; internet; social relationship
Year: 2017 PMID: 28280307 PMCID: PMC5338982 DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S126327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence ISSN: 1177-889X Impact factor: 2.711
Figure 1An example of an adolescent’s network map.
Smileys used by adolescents to visualize the quality of their social relationships
|
|
Characteristics of the participants describing and nondescribing social relationships
| Characteristics | Participants | Nonparticipants |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Female | 28 (96.6) | 27 (65.9) |
| Male | 1 (3.4) | 14 (34.1) |
| Age (years) | ||
| 15 | 12 (41.4) | 10 (24.4) |
| 16 | 7 (24.1) | 18 (43.9) |
| 17 | 10 (34.5) | 13 (31.7) |
| Education | ||
| In comprehensive school | 10 (34.5) | 13 (31.7) |
| Completed comprehensive school | 2 (6.9) | 6 (14.6) |
| In high school | 14 (48.3) | 15 (36.6) |
| In vocational school | 3 (10.3) | 5 (12.2) |
| Other/not known | 0 (0) | 2 (4.9) |
| Previous use of mental health care services | ||
| Yes | 18 (62.1) | 33 (80.5) |
| No | 9 (31.0) | 17 (17.1) |
| Not known | 2 (6.9) | 1 (2.4) |
Matrix of extent and identification of the adolescents’ social relationships based on quantitative and qualitative data (n=29)
| Extent and identification of social relationships based on network maps n (%) | Extent and identification of social relationships based on written text n (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Family | |||
| Mother | 18 (62.1) | Mother | 7 (24.1) |
| Father | 15 (51.7) | Family | 7 (24.1) |
| Family | 8 (27.6) | Father | 4 (13.8) |
| Sibling | 8 (27.6) | Sibling | 4 (13.8) |
| Stepfather | 1 (3.5) | Stepfather | 1 (3.5) |
| Stepmother | 1 (3.5) | ||
| Relatives | |||
| Relatives | 7 (20.7) | Grandparent | 2 (6.9) |
| Grandparent | 5 (17.2) | Relatives | 1 (3.5) |
| Uncle/aunt | 1 (3.5) | Uncle/aunt | 1 (3.5) |
| Cousin | 1 (3.5) | ||
| Peers | |||
| Friend | 19 (65.5) | Friends | 10 (34.5) |
| Boyfriend or girlfriend | 7 (24.1) | Boyfriend of girlfriend | 5 (17.2) |
| Other social relationships | |||
| People by name | 9 (31.0) | People by name | 5 (17.2) |
| Godparent | 3 (10.3) | Godparent | 1 (3.5) |
| Pet | 2 (6.9) | Pet | 1 (3.5) |
| Lack of social relationships | |||
| Lack of social relationships | 5 (17.2) | ||
Figure 2Quality of adolescents’ social relationships according to smileys.
Matrix of the quality of the adolescents’ social relationships as seen in the quantitative and qualitative data
| Quality of social relationships based on 99 smileys on network maps | Quality of social relationships based on written texts |
|---|---|
| Positive relationships | Positive relationships |
| 59% of all relationships | Trusting relationships |
| Negative relationships | Negative relationships |
| 10% of relationships | Distant relationships |
| Neutral relationships | Neutral relationships |
| 31% of relationships | Ordinary relationships |