IMPORTANCE: Small studies suggest that low-dose dopamine or low-dose nesiritide may enhance decongestion and preserve renal function in patients with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction; however, neither strategy has been rigorously tested. OBJECTIVE: To test the 2 independent hypotheses that, compared with placebo, addition of low-dose dopamine (2 μg/kg/min) or low-dose nesiritide (0.005 μg/kg/min without bolus) to diuretic therapy will enhance decongestion and preserve renal function in patients with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation [ROSE]) of 360 hospitalized patients with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15-60 mL/min/1.73 m2), randomized within 24 hours of admission. Enrollment occurred from September 2010 to March 2013 across 26 sites in North America. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized in an open, 1:1 allocation ratio to the dopamine or nesiritide strategy. Within each strategy, participants were randomized in a double-blind, 2:1 ratio to active treatment or placebo. The dopamine (n = 122) and nesiritide (n = 119) groups were independently compared with the pooled placebo group (n = 119). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Coprimary end points included 72-hour cumulative urine volume (decongestion end point) and the change in serum cystatin C from enrollment to 72 hours (renal function end point). RESULTS: Compared with placebo, low-dose dopamine had no significant effect on 72-hour cumulative urine volume (dopamine, 8524 mL; 95% CI, 7917-9131 vs placebo, 8296 mL; 95% CI, 7762-8830 ; difference, 229 mL; 95% CI, -714 to 1171 mL; P = .59) or on the change in cystatin C level (dopamine, 0.12 mg/L; 95% CI, 0.06-0.18 vs placebo, 0.11 mg/L; 95% CI, 0.06-0.16; difference, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.10; P = .72). Similarly, low-dose nesiritide had no significant effect on 72-hour cumulative urine volume (nesiritide, 8574 mL; 95% CI, 8014-9134 vs placebo, 8296 mL; 95% CI, 7762-8830; difference, 279 mL; 95% CI, -618 to 1176 mL; P = .49) or on the change in cystatin C level (nesiritide, 0.07 mg/L; 95% CI, 0.01-0.13 vs placebo, 0.11 mg/L; 95% CI, 0.06-0.16; difference, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.05; P = .36). Compared with placebo, there was no effect of low-dose dopamine or nesiritide on secondary end points reflective of decongestion, renal function, or clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In participants with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction, neither low-dose dopamine nor low-dose nesiritide enhanced decongestion or improved renal function when added to diuretic therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01132846.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Small studies suggest that low-dose dopamine or low-dose nesiritide may enhance decongestion and preserve renal function in patients with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction; however, neither strategy has been rigorously tested. OBJECTIVE: To test the 2 independent hypotheses that, compared with placebo, addition of low-dose dopamine (2 μg/kg/min) or low-dose nesiritide (0.005 μg/kg/min without bolus) to diuretic therapy will enhance decongestion and preserve renal function in patients with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation [ROSE]) of 360 hospitalized patients with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15-60 mL/min/1.73 m2), randomized within 24 hours of admission. Enrollment occurred from September 2010 to March 2013 across 26 sites in North America. INTERVENTIONS:Participants were randomized in an open, 1:1 allocation ratio to the dopamine or nesiritide strategy. Within each strategy, participants were randomized in a double-blind, 2:1 ratio to active treatment or placebo. The dopamine (n = 122) and nesiritide (n = 119) groups were independently compared with the pooled placebo group (n = 119). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Coprimary end points included 72-hour cumulative urine volume (decongestion end point) and the change in serum cystatin C from enrollment to 72 hours (renal function end point). RESULTS: Compared with placebo, low-dose dopamine had no significant effect on 72-hour cumulative urine volume (dopamine, 8524 mL; 95% CI, 7917-9131 vs placebo, 8296 mL; 95% CI, 7762-8830 ; difference, 229 mL; 95% CI, -714 to 1171 mL; P = .59) or on the change in cystatin C level (dopamine, 0.12 mg/L; 95% CI, 0.06-0.18 vs placebo, 0.11 mg/L; 95% CI, 0.06-0.16; difference, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.10; P = .72). Similarly, low-dose nesiritide had no significant effect on 72-hour cumulative urine volume (nesiritide, 8574 mL; 95% CI, 8014-9134 vs placebo, 8296 mL; 95% CI, 7762-8830; difference, 279 mL; 95% CI, -618 to 1176 mL; P = .49) or on the change in cystatin C level (nesiritide, 0.07 mg/L; 95% CI, 0.01-0.13 vs placebo, 0.11 mg/L; 95% CI, 0.06-0.16; difference, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.05; P = .36). Compared with placebo, there was no effect of low-dose dopamine or nesiritide on secondary end points reflective of decongestion, renal function, or clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In participants with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction, neither low-dose dopamine nor low-dose nesiritide enhanced decongestion or improved renal function when added to diuretic therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01132846.
Authors: C M O'Connor; R C Starling; A F Hernandez; P W Armstrong; K Dickstein; V Hasselblad; G M Heizer; M Komajda; B M Massie; J J V McMurray; M S Nieminen; C J Reist; J L Rouleau; K Swedberg; K F Adams; S D Anker; D Atar; A Battler; R Botero; N R Bohidar; J Butler; N Clausell; R Corbalán; M R Costanzo; U Dahlstrom; L I Deckelbaum; R Diaz; M E Dunlap; J A Ezekowitz; D Feldman; G M Felker; G C Fonarow; D Gennevois; S S Gottlieb; J A Hill; J E Hollander; J G Howlett; M P Hudson; R D Kociol; H Krum; A Laucevicius; W C Levy; G F Méndez; M Metra; S Mittal; B-H Oh; N L Pereira; P Ponikowski; W H W Tang; W H Wilson; S Tanomsup; J R Teerlink; F Triposkiadis; R W Troughton; A A Voors; D J Whellan; F Zannad; R M Califf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John R Teerlink; Gad Cotter; Beth A Davison; G Michael Felker; Gerasimos Filippatos; Barry H Greenberg; Piotr Ponikowski; Elaine Unemori; Adriaan A Voors; Kirkwood F Adams; Maria I Dorobantu; Liliana R Grinfeld; Guillaume Jondeau; Alon Marmor; Josep Masip; Peter S Pang; Karl Werdan; Sam L Teichman; Angelo Trapani; Christopher A Bush; Rajnish Saini; Christoph Schumacher; Thomas M Severin; Marco Metra Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: G Michael Felker; Kerry L Lee; David A Bull; Margaret M Redfield; Lynne W Stevenson; Steven R Goldsmith; Martin M LeWinter; Anita Deswal; Jean L Rouleau; Elizabeth O Ofili; Kevin J Anstrom; Adrian F Hernandez; Steven E McNulty; Eric J Velazquez; Abdallah G Kfoury; Horng H Chen; Michael M Givertz; Marc J Semigran; Bradley A Bart; Alice M Mascette; Eugene Braunwald; Christopher M O'Connor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Horng H Chen; Omar F AbouEzzeddine; Kevin J Anstrom; Michael M Givertz; Bradley A Bart; G Michael Felker; Adrian F Hernandez; Kerry L Lee; Eugene Braunwald; Margaret M Redfield Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Theophilus E Owan; Horng H Chen; Robert P Frantz; Barry L Karon; Wayne L Miller; Richard J Rodeheffer; David O Hodge; John C Burnett; Margaret M Redfield Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Bradley A Bart; Steven R Goldsmith; Kerry L Lee; Michael M Givertz; Christopher M O'Connor; David A Bull; Margaret M Redfield; Anita Deswal; Jean L Rouleau; Martin M LeWinter; Elizabeth O Ofili; Lynne W Stevenson; Marc J Semigran; G Michael Felker; Horng H Chen; Adrian F Hernandez; Kevin J Anstrom; Steven E McNulty; Eric J Velazquez; Jenny C Ibarra; Alice M Mascette; Eugene Braunwald Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen J Greene; G Michael Felker; Anna Giczewska; Andreas P Kalogeropoulos; Andrew P Ambrosy; Hrishikesh Chakraborty; Adam D DeVore; Marat Fudim; Steven E McNulty; Robert J Mentz; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Adrian F Hernandez; Javed Butler Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Yogesh N V Reddy; Masaru Obokata; Jeffrey M Testani; G Michael Felker; W H Wilson Tang; Omar F Abou-Ezzeddine; Jie-Lena Sun; Hrishikesh Chakrabothy; Steven McNulty; Sanjiv J Shah; Gregory D Lewis; Lynne W Stevenson; Margaret M Redfield; Barry A Borlaug Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2019-10-13 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Ravi B Patel; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Aruna Rikhi; Hrishikesh Chakraborty; Stephen J Greene; Adrian F Hernandez; G Michael Felker; Margaret M Redfield; Javed Butler; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Justin L Grodin; Dianne Gallup; Kevin J Anstrom; G Michael Felker; Horng H Chen; W H Wilson Tang Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 2.778