Literature DB >> 21366472

Diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

G Michael Felker1, Kerry L Lee, David A Bull, Margaret M Redfield, Lynne W Stevenson, Steven R Goldsmith, Martin M LeWinter, Anita Deswal, Jean L Rouleau, Elizabeth O Ofili, Kevin J Anstrom, Adrian F Hernandez, Steven E McNulty, Eric J Velazquez, Abdallah G Kfoury, Horng H Chen, Michael M Givertz, Marc J Semigran, Bradley A Bart, Alice M Mascette, Eugene Braunwald, Christopher M O'Connor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loop diuretics are an essential component of therapy for patients with acute decompensated heart failure, but there are few prospective data to guide their use.
METHODS: In a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned 308 patients with acute decompensated heart failure to receive furosemide administered intravenously by means of either a bolus every 12 hours or continuous infusion and at either a low dose (equivalent to the patient's previous oral dose) or a high dose (2.5 times the previous oral dose). The protocol allowed specified dose adjustments after 48 hours. The coprimary end points were patients' global assessment of symptoms, quantified as the area under the curve (AUC) of the score on a visual-analogue scale over the course of 72 hours, and the change in the serum creatinine level from baseline to 72 hours.
RESULTS: In the comparison of bolus with continuous infusion, there was no significant difference in patients' global assessment of symptoms (mean AUC, 4236±1440 and 4373±1404, respectively; P=0.47) or in the mean change in the creatinine level (0.05±0.3 mg per deciliter [4.4±26.5 μmol per liter] and 0.07±0.3 mg per deciliter [6.2±26.5 μmol per liter], respectively; P=0.45). In the comparison of the high-dose strategy with the low-dose strategy, there was a nonsignificant trend toward greater improvement in patients' global assessment of symptoms in the high-dose group (mean AUC, 4430±1401 vs. 4171±1436; P=0.06). There was no significant difference between these groups in the mean change in the creatinine level (0.08±0.3 mg per deciliter [7.1±26.5 μmol per liter] with the high-dose strategy and 0.04±0.3 mg per deciliter [3.5±26.5 μmol per liter] with the low-dose strategy, P=0.21). The high-dose strategy was associated with greater diuresis and more favorable outcomes in some secondary measures but also with transient worsening of renal function.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute decompensated heart failure, there were no significant differences in patients' global assessment of symptoms or in the change in renal function when diuretic therapy was administered by bolus as compared with continuous infusion or at a high dose as compared with a low dose. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00577135.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21366472      PMCID: PMC3412356          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  24 in total

1.  A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise.

Authors:  S Grant; T Aitchison; E Henderson; J Christie; S Zare; J McMurray; H Dargie
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Diuretic efficacy of high dose furosemide in severe heart failure: bolus injection versus continuous infusion.

Authors:  T P Dormans; J J van Meyel; P G Gerlag; Y Tan; F G Russel; P Smits
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Diuresis in hemodynamically compromised patients: continuous furosemide infusion.

Authors:  J A Magovern; G J Magovern
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Diuresis with continuous infusion of furosemide after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J G Copeland; D W Campbell; J R Plachetka; N W Salomon; D F Larson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Continuous infusion of frusemide in refractory oedema.

Authors:  D H Lawson; J M Gray; D A Henry; W J Tillstone
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-08-12

6.  Potential effects of aggressive decongestion during the treatment of decompensated heart failure on renal function and survival.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Testani; Jennifer Chen; Brian D McCauley; Stephen E Kimmel; Richard P Shannon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Continuous infusion of furosemide in the treatment of patients with congestive heart failure and diuretic resistance.

Authors:  J J van Meyel; P Smits; T Dormans; P G Gerlag; F G Russel; F W Gribnau
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Relationship between heart failure treatment and development of worsening renal function among hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Javed Butler; Daniel E Forman; William T Abraham; Stephen S Gottlieb; Evan Loh; Barry M Massie; Christopher M O'Connor; Michael W Rich; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Yongfei Wang; James B Young; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Loop diuretics for chronic renal insufficiency: a continuous infusion is more efficacious than bolus therapy.

Authors:  D W Rudy; J R Voelker; P K Greene; F A Esparza; D C Brater
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Bed rest and increased diuretic treatment in chronic congestive heart failure.

Authors:  U Abildgaard; J Aldershvile; H Ring-Larsen; J Falk; N J Christensen; J Giese; M Hammer; J H Henriksen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  358 in total

1.  Rehabilitation Therapy in Older Acute Heart Failure Patients (REHAB-HF) trial: Design and rationale.

Authors:  Gordon R Reeves; David J Whellan; Pamela Duncan; Christopher M O'Connor; Amy M Pastva; Joel D Eggebeen; Leigh Ann Hewston; Timothy M Morgan; Shelby D Reed; W Jack Rejeski; Robert J Mentz; Paul B Rosenberg; Dalane W Kitzman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Congestion is the driving force behind heart failure.

Authors:  Maya Guglin
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-09

3.  Evolving treatment strategies for management of cardiorenal syndrome.

Authors:  Sanjay Dandamudi; Horng H Chen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 4.  Right Heart Failure and Cardiorenal Syndrome.

Authors:  Thida Tabucanon; Wai Hong Wilson Tang
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.213

5.  Time trends in characteristics, clinical course, and outcomes of 13,791 patients with acute heart failure.

Authors:  Pere Llorens; Patricia Javaloyes; Francisco Javier Martín-Sánchez; Javier Jacob; Pablo Herrero-Puente; Víctor Gil; José Manuel Garrido; Eva Salvo; Marta Fuentes; Héctor Alonso; Fernando Richard; Francisco Javier Lucas; Héctor Bueno; John Parissis; Christian E Müller; Òscar Miró
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Influence of age-related versus non-age-related renal dysfunction on survival in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Testani; Meredith A Brisco; Gang Han; Olga Laur; Alexander J Kula; Susan J Cheng; Wai Hong Wilson Tang; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Organ dysfunction, injury and failure in acute heart failure: from pathophysiology to diagnosis and management. A review on behalf of the Acute Heart Failure Committee of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Harjola; Wilfried Mullens; Marek Banaszewski; Johann Bauersachs; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Ovidiu Chioncel; Sean P Collins; Wolfram Doehner; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Andreas J Flammer; Valentin Fuhrmann; Mitja Lainscak; Johan Lassus; Matthieu Legrand; Josep Masip; Christian Mueller; Zoltán Papp; John Parissis; Elke Platz; Alain Rudiger; Frank Ruschitzka; Andreas Schäfer; Petar M Seferovic; Hadi Skouri; Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz; Alexandre Mebazaa
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 15.534

8.  [New options in the treatment of acute heart failure].

Authors:  A Link; M Böhm
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Targeting the kidney in acute heart failure: can old drugs provide new benefit? Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE AHF) trial.

Authors:  Horng H Chen; Omar F AbouEzzeddine; Kevin J Anstrom; Michael M Givertz; Bradley A Bart; G Michael Felker; Adrian F Hernandez; Kerry L Lee; Eugene Braunwald; Margaret M Redfield
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 10.  Addressing the Heterogeneity of Heart Failure in Future Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Annamaria Iorio; Andrea Pozzi; Michele Senni
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.