Literature DB >> 24244095

Triceps Brachii in Incomplete Tetraplegia: EMG and Dynamometer Evaluation of Residual Motor Resources and Capacity for Strengthening.

M Elise Johanson1, Zoia C Lateva, Jeffrey Jaramillo, B Jenny Kiratli, Kevin C McGill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Candidates for activity-based therapy after spinal cord injury (SCI) are often selected on the basis of manual muscle test scores and the classification of the injury as complete or incomplete. However, these scores may not adequately predict which individuals have sufficient residual motor resources for the therapy to be beneficial.
OBJECTIVE: We performed a preliminary study to see whether dynamometry and quantitative electromyography (EMG) can provide a more detailed assessment of residual motor resources.
METHODS: We measured elbow extension strength using a hand-held dynamometer and recorded fine-wire EMG from the triceps brachii muscles of 4 individuals with C5, C6, or C7 level SCI and 2 able-bodied controls. We used EMG decomposition to measure motor unit action potential (MUAP) amplitudes and motor unit (MU) recruitment and firing-rate profiles during constant and ramp contractions.
RESULTS: All 4 subjects with cervical SCI (cSCI) had increased MUAP amplitudes indicative of denervation. Two of the subjects with cSCI had very weak elbow extension strength (<4 kg), dramatically reduced recruitment, and excessive firing rates (>40 pps), suggesting profound loss of motoneurons. The other 2 subjects with cSCI had stronger elbow extension (>6 kg), more normal recruitment, and more normal firing rates, suggesting a substantial remaining motoneuron population.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamometry and quantitative EMG may provide information about the extent of gray matter loss in cSCI to help guide rehabilitation strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamometry; electromyography; motor units; spinal cord injury; triceps brachii

Year:  2013        PMID: 24244095      PMCID: PMC3816724          DOI: 10.1310/sci1904-300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil        ISSN: 1082-0744


  32 in total

1.  Firing rates of motor units during strong dynamic contractions.

Authors:  Alejandro Del Valle; Christine K Thomas
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Cortical reorganization following bimanual training and somatosensory stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury: a case report.

Authors:  Larisa R Hoffman; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-01-09

3.  Detecting the unique representation of motor-unit action potentials in the surface electromyogram.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Francesco Negro; Marco Gazzoni; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evident transsynaptic degeneration of motor neurons after spinal cord injury: a study of neuromuscular jitter by axonal microstimulation.

Authors:  C W Chang
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 5.  Neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury and training: an emerging paradigm shift in rehabilitation and walking recovery.

Authors:  Andrea L Behrman; Mark G Bowden; Preeti M Nair
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2006-10

6.  Motor unit numbers and contractile properties after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  J F Yang; R B Stein; J Jhamandas; T Gordon
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of acute cervical spine trauma. Correlation with severity of neurologic injury.

Authors:  D M Schaefer; A Flanders; B E Northrup; H T Doan; J L Osterholm
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Triceps denervation as a predictor of elbow flexion contractures in C5 and C6 tetraplegia.

Authors:  Anne M Bryden; Kevin L Kilgore; Benjamin B Lind; David T Yu
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Muscle strength changes as measured by dynamometry following functional rehabilitation in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M Drolet; L Noreau; J Vachon; H Moffet
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 10.  Management of postpolio syndrome.

Authors:  Henrik Gonzalez; Tomas Olsson; Kristian Borg
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 44.182

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantitative electrodiagnostic patterns of damage and recovery after spinal cord injury: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elissa C Zakrasek; Jeffrey P Jaramillo; Zoia C Lateva; Vandana Punj; B Jenny Kiratli; Kevin C McGill
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2019-12-12

2.  Upper limb muscle activation during sports video gaming of persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Jaramillo; M Elise Johanson; B Jenny Kiratli
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Motor unit firing rates during spasms in thenar muscles of spinal cord injured subjects.

Authors:  Inge Zijdewind; Rob Bakels; Christine K Thomas
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Distinct Corticospinal and Reticulospinal Contributions to Voluntary Control of Elbow Flexor and Extensor Muscles in Humans with Tetraplegia.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Electrophysiological Study in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Patients: Its Correlation to Neurological Deficit and Subsequent Recovery Assessment by ASIA Score.

Authors:  Roop Singh; Jitendra Wadhwani; Vijay Singh Meena; Pankaj Sharma; Kiranpreet Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  CMAP Scan Examination of the First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Ya Zong; Zhiyuan Lu; Maoqi Chen; Xiaoyan Li; Argyrios Stampas; Lianfu Deng; Ping Zhou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.802

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.