Literature DB >> 18207312

Development, validation, and head-to-head comparison of logistic regression-based nomograms and artificial neural network models predicting prostate cancer on initial extended biopsy.

Satoru Kawakami1, Noboru Numao, Yuhei Okubo, Fumitaka Koga, Shinya Yamamoto, Kazutaka Saito, Yasuhisa Fujii, Junji Yonese, Hitoshi Masuda, Kazunori Kihara, Iwao Fukui.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Using cohorts examined by extended biopsy, we developed and validated multivariate models predicting prostate cancer on initial biopsy and examined whether these extended biopsy-based models outperform previously established models.
METHODS: Initial extended biopsy (median 22 cores) was performed in 1509 Japanese men including 1083 at Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital (TMDU) and 426 at Cancer Institute Hospital (CIH). Logistic regression-based nomograms 1 and artificial neural network (ANN) 1 incorporating age, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free PSA, and nomogram 2 and ANN2 further incorporating transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) findings and prostate volume were constructed on the TMDU data. These and previously established models were externally validated on the CIH data set and predictive accuracy was compared directly.
RESULTS: Without TRUS-derived information, nomogram 1 outperformed the ANN1. With TRUS-derived information, nomogram 2 was more accurate than ANN2. External validation revealed applicability of the Western models to Japanese population, superiority of the nomograms over ANN models, and better predictive accuracy of our extended biopsy-based nomograms than the previous 6-10-core biopsy-based models. Using nomograms 1 and 2, 16% and 19% unnecessary biopsies would be saved at 95% sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed new nomograms predicting prostate cancer on initial biopsy in men with PSA <20ng/ml. Predictive accuracy of these extended biopsy-based nomograms is better than those of previously established models based on 6-10-core biopsies. Our models might help clinicians to decide if a patient requires biopsy and to avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18207312     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  26 in total

Review 1.  An overview of prostate diseases and their characteristics specific to Asian men.

Authors:  Shu-Jie Xia; Di Cui; Qi Jiang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  A novel equation and nomogram including body weight for estimating prostate volumes in men with biopsy-proven benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Yasukazu Nakanishi; Hitoshi Masuda; Satoru Kawakami; Mizuaki Sakura; Yasuhisa Fujii; Kazutaka Saito; Fumitaka Koga; Masaya Ito; Junji Yonese; Iwao Fukui; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Unmet needs in the prediction and detection of metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Sartor; Mario Eisenberger; Michael W Kattan; Bertrand Tombal; Frederic Lecouvet
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-06

4.  The value of an artificial neural network in the decision-making for prostate biopsies.

Authors:  R P Meijer; E F A Gemen; I E W van Onna; J C van der Linden; H P Beerlage; G C M Kusters
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Artificial neural networks and prostate cancer--tools for diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Xinhai Hu; Henning Cammann; Hellmuth-A Meyer; Kurt Miller; Klaus Jung; Carsten Stephan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Systematic review of clinical features of suspected prostate cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Sheila-Mae Young; Praveen Bansal; Emily T Vella; Antonio Finelli; Cheryl Levitt; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  [Value of biomarkers in urology].

Authors:  P J Goebell; B Keck; S Wach; B Wullich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  A nomogram based on age, prostate-specific antigen level, prostate volume and digital rectal examination for predicting risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ping Tang; Hui Chen; Matthew Uhlman; Yu-Rong Lin; Xiang-Rong Deng; Bin Wang; Wen-Jun Yang; Ke-Ji Xie
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  Random biopsy: when, how many and where to take the cores?

Authors:  Vincenzo Scattoni; Carmen Maccagnano; Umberto Capitanio; Andrea Gallina; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Initial biopsy outcome prediction in Korean patients-comparison of a noble web-based Korean prostate cancer risk calculator versus prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  Jae Young Park; Sungroh Yoon; Man Sik Park; Dae-Yeon Cho; Hong-Seok Park; Du Geon Moon; Duck Ki Yoon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.