Literature DB >> 24243032

Functional capacity evaluation: Rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach.

S J Isernhagen1.   

Abstract

The return to work process of an injured worker is dependent upon matching the physical abilities of the worker with physical demands of work tasks. Functional work movements and tasks are complex. Machines, equipment and isolated musculoskeletal testing have not produced data that is broad enough to project multi-faceted work ability. Functional capacity evaluations, which are sets of dynamic work tests, have seen a growing acceptance because of their whole-worker approach. The basic items of functional evaluations (lifting, carrying, bending, reaching, climbing) are compiled into a comprehensive test which results in information about the whole of work and overall ability of the worker. Projections into an eight-hour day and comparison to physical demands of the job are included in outcome of a functional capacity evaluation. The Kinesiophysical design approach also produces information on safety, compliance, movement characteristics and physical reasons behind work limitations. Utility of functional evaluation is exemplified when employers, and physicians use it as a basis for safe work return of the employee.

Year:  1992        PMID: 24243032     DOI: 10.1007/BF01077187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  3 in total

1.  Chronic low-back pain, psychologic distress, and illness behavior.

Authors:  G Waddell; C J Main; E W Morris; M Di Paola; I C Gray
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain.

Authors:  G Waddell; J A McCulloch; E Kummel; R M Venner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury. A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up.

Authors:  T G Mayer; R J Gatchel; N Kishino; J Keeley; P Capra; H Mayer; J Barnett; V Mooney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

  3 in total
  37 in total

1.  Upper lifting performance of healthy young adults in functional capacity evaluations: a comparison of two protocols.

Authors:  S IJmker; E H Gerrits; M F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  Measurement properties of performance-based assessment of functional capacity.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

Review 3.  Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  Glenn S Pransky; Patrick G Dempsey
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

4.  The interrater reliability of a functional capacity evaluation: the physical work performance evaluation.

Authors:  Marie-José Durand; Patrick Loisel; Stéphane Poitras; Richard Mercier; Susan R Stock; Jacques Lemaire
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

Review 5.  [Patients with low back pain. Psychosocial work-related factors and return to work - a literature review].

Authors:  M Bethge
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The role of back muscle endurance, maximum force, balance and trunk rotation control regarding lifting capacity.

Authors:  Peter Schenk; Andreas Klipstein; Susanne Spillmann; Jesper Strøyer; Thomas Laubli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Douglas Paul Gross; Michele Crites Battié
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

8.  Functional self-efficacy beliefs influence functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  Alexander K Asante; E Sharon Brintnell; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-03

9.  Does functional capacity evaluation predict recovery in workers' compensation claimants with upper extremity disorders?

Authors:  D P Gross; M C Battié
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  Michiel F Reneman; Wim Jorritsma; Jan M H Schellekens; Ludwig N H Göeken
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.