Shaun D Mendenhall1, Stav Brown2, Oded Ben-Amotz3, Michael W Neumeister4, L Scott Levin3. 1. University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA. 2. Tel Aviv University, Israel. 3. University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA. 4. Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, USA.
Abstract
Background: Upper extremity transplantation is a quality-of-life enhancing treatment for select patients with upper extremity loss. This article reviews the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative challenges in the upper extremity transplantation process and the lessons learned from the first 2 decades of hand transplantation. Methods: Key components of the author's hand transplantation protocol including patient selection, donor screening, surgical rehearsal, donor procurement, transplantation, immunosuppression, and patient outcome reporting/follow-up are reported to assist other teams who wish to establish a hand transplantation program. Results: There have been many advancements in the first 20 years of hand transplantation including better patient selection criteria, the recent addition of pediatric patients, improved surgical techniques such as the use of virtual surgical planning, and improved immunosuppression protocols. Improvement has also taken place in the tracking and reporting of hand transplant outcomes, but more work is clearly needed to fully define the benefits of transplantation, especially for pediatric patients. Conclusions: Over the past 20 years, significant progress has been made in upper extremity transplantation although a number of challenges remain including how to best document and share outcome measures, optimize immunosuppression, and diagnose/treat rejection. The authors encourage upper extremity transplant programs to report their experience and protocols to advance hand transplantation as standard of care for properly selected individuals.
Background: Upper extremity transplantation is a quality-of-life enhancing treatment for select patients with upper extremity loss. This article reviews the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative challenges in the upper extremity transplantation process and the lessons learned from the first 2 decades of hand transplantation. Methods: Key components of the author's hand transplantation protocol including patient selection, donor screening, surgical rehearsal, donor procurement, transplantation, immunosuppression, and patient outcome reporting/follow-up are reported to assist other teams who wish to establish a hand transplantation program. Results: There have been many advancements in the first 20 years of hand transplantation including better patient selection criteria, the recent addition of pediatric patients, improved surgical techniques such as the use of virtual surgical planning, and improved immunosuppression protocols. Improvement has also taken place in the tracking and reporting of hand transplant outcomes, but more work is clearly needed to fully define the benefits of transplantation, especially for pediatric patients. Conclusions: Over the past 20 years, significant progress has been made in upper extremity transplantation although a number of challenges remain including how to best document and share outcome measures, optimize immunosuppression, and diagnose/treat rejection. The authors encourage upper extremity transplant programs to report their experience and protocols to advance hand transplantation as standard of care for properly selected individuals.
Entities:
Keywords:
composite tissue allotransplantation; hand amputation; hand transplant; hand transplantation; vascularized composite allotransplantation
Authors: Tristan L Hartzell; Prosper Benhaim; Joseph E Imbriglia; Jaimie T Shores; Robert J Goitz; Marshall Balk; Scott Mitchell; Roee Rubinstein; Vijay S Gorantla; Stefan Schneeberger; Gerald Brandacher; W P Andrew Lee; Kodi K Azari Journal: Hand Clin Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 1.907
Authors: J R Diaz-Siso; S Fischer; G C Sisk; E Bueno; M Kueckelhaus; S Talbot; M J Carty; N S Treister; F Marty; E L Milford; B Pomahac; S G Tullius Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Palmina Petruzzo; Aram Gazarian; Jean Kanitakis; Helene Parmentier; Vincent Guigal; Michel Guillot; Christophe Vial; Jean Michel Dubernard; Emmanuel Morelon; Lionel Badet Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Karim A Sarhane; Sami H Tuffaha; Justin M Broyles; Amir E Ibrahim; Saami Khalifian; Pablo Baltodano; Gabriel F Santiago; Mohammed Alrakan; Zuhaib Ibrahim Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Pathik Aravind; Christopher Frost; Vidhi Javia; Damon S Cooney; Gerald Brandacher; Jaimie T Shores; Carisa M Cooney Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2020-11-16