Literature DB >> 24241485

Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function.

James F Fries1, James Witter, Matthias Rose, David Cella, Dinesh Khanna, Esi Morgan-DeWitt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires record health information directly from research participants because observers may not accurately represent the patient perspective. Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a US National Institutes of Health cooperative group charged with bringing PRO to a new level of precision and standardization across diseases by item development and use of item response theory (IRT).
METHODS: With IRT methods, improved items are calibrated on an underlying concept to form an item bank for a "domain" such as physical function (PF). The most informative items can be combined to construct efficient "instruments" such as 10-item or 20-item PF static forms. Each item is calibrated on the basis of the probability that a given person will respond at a given level, and the ability of the item to discriminate people from one another. Tailored forms may cover any desired level of the domain being measured. Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) selects the best items to sharpen the estimate of a person's functional ability, based on prior responses to earlier questions. PROMIS item banks have been improved with experience from several thousand items, and are calibrated on over 21,000 respondents.
RESULTS: In areas tested to date, PROMIS PF instruments are superior or equal to Health Assessment Questionnaire and Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Survey legacy instruments in clarity, translatability, patient importance, reliability, and sensitivity to change.
CONCLUSION: Precise measures, such as PROMIS, efficiently incorporate patient self-report of health into research, potentially reducing research cost by lowering sample size requirements. The advent of routine IRT applications has the potential to transform PRO measurement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING; DISABILITY; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; PROMIS

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24241485     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  56 in total

1.  Using Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures to Understand the Relationship Between Improvement in Physical Function and Depressive Symptoms.

Authors:  Casey M Beleckas; Jason Guattery; Aaron M Chamberlain; Taleef Khan; Michael P Kelly; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Shortening the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R): A Proof-of-Principle Study for Customized Computer-Based Testing.

Authors:  Matthew D Finkelman; Ronald J Kulich; Kevin L Zacharoff; Niels Smits; Britta E Magnuson; Jinghui Dong; Stephen F Butler
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  The Association Between Yoga Use, Physical Function, and Employment in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Heather M Greysen; Oi Saeng Hong; Patricia Katz
Journal:  Holist Nurs Pract       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  2019 American College of Rheumatology Recommended Patient-Reported Functional Status Assessment Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Claire E H Barber; JoAnn Zell; Jinoos Yazdany; Aileen M Davis; Laura Cappelli; Linda Ehrlich-Jones; Donna Everix; J Carter Thorne; Victoria Bohm; Lisa Suter; Alex Limanni; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 6.  The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Nan E Rothrock; Esi M DeWitt; Brennan Spiegel; Carole A Tucker; Heidi M Crane; Christopher B Forrest; Donald L Patrick; Rob Fredericksen; Lisa M Shulman; David Cella; Paul K Crane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  News from the NIH: Person-centered outcomes measurement: NIH-supported measurement systems to evaluate self-assessed health, functional performance, and symptomatic toxicity.

Authors:  Ashley Wilder Smith; Sandra A Mitchell; Cheryl K De Aguiar; Claudia Moy; William T Riley; Molly V Wagster; Ellen M Werner
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Sara J Morgan; Robert L Askew; Rana Salem
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2016

9.  Validation of the depression item bank from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in a three-month observational study.

Authors:  Paul A Pilkonis; Lan Yu; Nathan E Dodds; Kelly L Johnston; Catherine C Maihoefer; Suzanne M Lawrence
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  Characteristics Associated With Physical Function Trajectories in Older Adults With Cancer During Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Melisa L Wong; Steven M Paul; Judy Mastick; Christine Ritchie; Michael A Steinman; Louise C Walter; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.