Literature DB >> 24241388

Electron microscopic study of succession in the periphyton community of lake Washington.

T L Jordan1, J T Staley.   

Abstract

Microbial succession has been observed on electron microscope grids immersed in lake water for 1, 3, 6, and 10 days. As predicted by ecological theory, the biomass, numbers, and diversity of attached microorganisms increased as succession proceeded. The diversity index of Shannon showed a marked increase from 3.1 at day 1 to 4.2 at day 3. It continued to rise at day 6 and attained the maximum value calculated on day 10 of 4.8. Bacteria were the major pioneer colonizers in this mesotrophic community. Based on these results and the results of other microbiologists who have found bacteria to be the dominant component during the pioneer stage of succession in periphyton communities of varying trophic status, we suggest that microbial heterotrophs may commonly, and perhaps always, be the major component of the early pioneer community of autogenic successions.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 24241388     DOI: 10.1007/BF02011645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  6 in total

1.  The Effect of Solid Surfaces upon Bacterial Activity.

Authors:  C E Zobell
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1943-07       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Studies of Freshwater Bacteria: III. Quantitative Aspects of the Direct Microscopic Method.

Authors:  A T Henrici
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1936-09       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Hydrolytic enzymes of some periphytic marine bacteria.

Authors:  W A Corpe; H Winters
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Selective sorption of bacteria from seawater.

Authors:  K C Marshall; R Stout; R Mitchell
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Study of bacterial populations in natural environments by use of submerged electron microscope grids.

Authors:  P Hirsch; S H Pankratz
Journal:  Z Allg Mikrobiol       Date:  1970

6.  The strategy of ecosystem development.

Authors:  E P Odum
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Bacterioneuston examined with critical point drying and transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  L Y Young
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Unusual microorganisms observed in New Zealand hot springs.

Authors:  B K Patel; H W Morgan; R M Daniel
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Negative staining of freshwater bacterioneuston sampled directly with electron microscope specimen support grids.

Authors:  J A Fuerst; A McGregor; M R Dickson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Quantitation of microbial growth on surfaces.

Authors:  D E Caldwell; D K Brannan; M E Morris; M R Betlach
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Characteristics of bacterial communities in the Gulf of Alaska.

Authors:  J D Hauxhurst; T Kaneko; R M Atlas
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Note: Colonization and invasion of leaves of the aquatic macrophyteCeratophyllum demersum L. by epiphytic bacteria.

Authors:  G J Underwood
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Quantifying microbial diversity: morphotypes, 16S rRNA genes, and carotenoids of oxygenic phototrophs in microbial mats.

Authors:  U Nübel; F Garcia-Pichel; M Kühl; G Muyzer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  In situ reproductive rate of freshwater Caulobacter spp.

Authors:  J S Poindexter; K P Pujara; J T Staley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Sea ice microbial communities. III. Seasonal abundance of microalgae and associated bacteria, Mcmurdo Sound, Antarctica.

Authors:  S McGrath Grossi; S T Kottmeier; C W Sullivan
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  A comparison of the Caulobacter NA1000 and K31 genomes reveals extensive genome rearrangements and differences in metabolic potential.

Authors:  Kurt Ash; Theta Brown; Tynetta Watford; LaTia E Scott; Craig Stephens; Bert Ely
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.