Literature DB >> 24240816

CT analysis of C2 pedicles morphology and considerations of useful parameters for screwing.

Mourad Ould-Slimane1, Sebastien Le Pape, Julien Leroux, Emmanuel Foulongne, Camille Damade, Franck Dujardin, Fabrice Duparc.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgery of cervical spine steadily requires realizing posterior osteosynthesis. The anchoring of instrumentation in C2 steadily constitutes an important stake of prognosis. Pedicle screwing is one of the best options and remains associated with a low morbidity. The aim of this CT study is to provide, from a wide population, the descriptive anatomical parameters of C2 pedicles. The data enable this analysis of feasibility of C2 pedicles screwing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A continuous and retrospective series have explored 100 CT scans of the cervical spine without finding C2 fracture. The software OSIRIX v5.0.2 has been used. The dimensions of the pedicles in C2 as length, diameter, and distance from the vertebral foramens have been measured from the preset posterior entry point. Their orientation has been described in the axial and sagittal plan by the pedicle transverse angle, the sagittal angle and the pedicle-lamina angle used as a visible mark during the procedure. At least, the feasibility of pedicle screwing has been evaluated using a diameter criterion higher than 4 mm.
RESULTS: The dimensions analysis of 200 studied pedicles has found an average length as 26.18 mm, an average diameter as 5.18 mm and an average distance between the entry point and the vertebral foramen as 9.06 mm. Their orientations have an average PTA as 36.6° and a SA as 25.8°. The average of the PLA was 81.3. The screwing feasibility has been evaluated as 92.5 % in the whole series.
CONCLUSION: These morphological data come from a large series give some help for the C2 pedicle screwing preoperative planning. These lean on 3D measures but also on accessible mark during the procedure and despite the difference of the patient orientation. A CT preoperative planning of the pedicle screwing remains essential because more than 7 % of the pedicles have a diameter lower than 4 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24240816     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-013-1233-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  14 in total

1.  Surgical anatomy of the C-2 pedicle.

Authors:  J U Howington; J J Kruse; D Awasthi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  An anatomical study of the C-2 pedicle.

Authors:  Sait Naderi; Candan Arman; Mustafa Güvençer; Esin Korman; Mehmet Senoğlu; Süleyman Tetik; Nuri Arda
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-10

3.  Anatomical considerations for subaxial (C2) pedicle screw placement: a radiographic study with computed tomography in 93 patients.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Simona Bistazzoni; Adebukoa Onibokun; Nan-Fu Chen; Marco Sassi; Larry T Khoo
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-05

4.  Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): navigating the fifth dimension: innovative interface for multidimensional multimodality image navigation.

Authors:  Antoine Rosset; Luca Spadola; Lance Pysher; Osman Ratib
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Anatomic consideration of C2 pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  E C Benzel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Comparison of safety and stability of C-2 pars and pedicle screws for atlantoaxial fusion: meta-analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Robert E Elliott; Omar Tanweer; Akwasi Boah; Michael L Smith; Anthony Frempong-Boadu
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-10-05

7.  Treatment of pedicular fractures of the axis. A clinical study and screw fixation technique.

Authors:  G M Borne; G L Bedou; M Pinaudeau
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  In vitro study of accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion using an electronic conductivity device (ATPS part III).

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Wolfgang Hitzl; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Juliane Zenner; Herbert Resch; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Oliver Meier; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Morphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the C2 pedicle axis.

Authors:  R Xu; M C Nadaud; N A Ebraheim; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Embryology and bony malformations of the craniovertebral junction.

Authors:  Dachling Pang; Dominic N P Thompson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 1.475

View more
  2 in total

1.  The technique of using three-dimensional and multiplanar reformatted computed tomography for preoperative planning in pediatric craniovertebral anomalies.

Authors:  Kshitij Chaudhary; Arjun Dhawale; Avi Shah; Abhay Nene
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2021-07-14

2.  "Two-step" technique with OsiriX™ to evaluate feasibility of C2 pedicle for surgical fixation.

Authors:  Luis Miguel Sousa Marques; Gonçalo Neto d'Almeida; José Cabral
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.