Literature DB >> 24240390

Differences between Han Chinese and Caucasians in transcranial magnetic stimulation parameters.

Xiang Yi1, Karen M Fisher, Ming Lai, Kashif Mansoor, R Bicker, Stuart N Baker.   

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the difference between Han Chinese and Caucasians on various parameters measured from responses to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS). Sixteen subjects were studied in each group. A circular coil at the vertex was used for stimulation, whilst recording surface electromyograms from right first dorsal interosseous. In the passive state, motor-evoked potential (MEP) threshold, MEP recruitment, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation were measured. The MEP threshold, recruitment and silent period were also measured in the active state. Chinese subjects showed significantly higher passive thresholds (P < 0.005), less inhibition of the motor response (SICI, P < 0.0005) and a shorter silent period (P < 0.05). Differences in SICI appeared to be a consequence of the differences in passive threshold and were not seen when active threshold was used to determine the conditioning stimulus intensity. Differences in silent period may also reflect differences in cortical excitability rather than inhibitory processes, as they were not seen when the silent-period duration was expressed as a function of MEP size, rather than TMS intensity. There appears to be a significant difference in some TMS parameters between Han Chinese and Caucasian subjects. This may reflect an underlying difference in cortical excitability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24240390      PMCID: PMC3901935          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3763-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Modification of the silent period by double transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  T Wu; M Sommer; F Tergau; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population.

Authors:  Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  Robert Chen; Didier Cros; Antonio Curra; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Michel R Magistris; Kerry Mills; Kai M Rösler; William J Triggs; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Intracortical facilitation and inhibition after transcranial magnetic stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  H Nakamura; H Kitagawa; Y Kawaguchi; H Tsuji
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The muscle silent period following transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation.

Authors:  S A Wilson; R J Lockwood; G W Thickbroom; F L Mastaglia
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  Spinal and supraspinal mechanisms contribute to the silent period in the contracting soleus muscle after transcranial magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex.

Authors:  U Ziemann; J Netz; A Szelényi; V Hömberg
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1993-06-25       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Abnormal facilitation of the response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; A Pascual-Leone; J P Brasil-Neto; A Cammarota; L McShane; M Hallett
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex.

Authors:  T Kujirai; M D Caramia; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; A Ferbert; S Wroe; P Asselman; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Origin of facilitation of motor-evoked potentials after paired magnetic stimulation: direct recording of epidural activity in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; F Pilato; A Oliviero; M Dileone; E Saturno; P Mazzone; A Insola; P Profice; F Ranieri; F Capone; P A Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Reticular formation responses to magnetic brain stimulation of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Karen M Fisher; Boubker Zaaimi; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  4 in total

1.  Altered corticospinal function during movement preparation in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Paolo Federico; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Polymorphism Influences Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at Rest.

Authors:  Priyanka Shah-Basak; Denise Y Harvey; Shreya Parchure; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Daniela Sacchetti; Ahmed Ahmed; Abdou Thiam; Falk W Lohoff; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-10-09

3.  The reliability of repeated TMS measures in older adults and in patients with subacute and chronic stroke.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; R Todd Ogden; Isis E Martínez-Hernández; Xuejing Lin; Y Brenda Chang; Asif Rahman; Dylan J Edwards; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 5.505

Review 4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in behavioral and food addiction: a systematic review of efficacy, technical, and methodological issues.

Authors:  Anne Sauvaget; Benoît Trojak; Samuel Bulteau; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; Fernando Fernández-Aranda; Ines Wolz; José M Menchón; Sophia Achab; Jean-Marie Vanelle; Marie Grall-Bronnec
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.