Literature DB >> 24240342

Selection for components related to body composition in mice: direct responses.

E J Eisen1.   

Abstract

Replicated within full-sib family single-trait selection was conducted for 10 generations in mice for (1) high or low 12-week epididymal fat pad percentage (100 x epididymal fat pad weight/body weight) or (2) high or low 12-week hind carcass percentage (100 x hind carcass weight/body weight). Pooled realized heritabilities based on high, low and divergent selection were 0.66±0.09, 0.65±0.13 and 0.66±0.05 for epididymal fat pad percentage and 0.48±0.08, 0.33±0.08 and 0.40±0.04 for hind carcass percentage. The pooled realized genetic correlation (rG R) between epididymal fat pad percentage and hind carcass percentage based on divergence was -0.67±0.04. Other estimates of (rG R) were: epididymal fat pad percentage with body weight (0.57±0.05); epididymal fat pad percentage with epididymal fat pad weight (1.17±0.05); hind carcass percentage with body weight (-0.61±0.09); hind carcass percentage with hind carcass weight (-0.05±0.11). Indirect measures of fat and lean tissue percentages were highly heritable, and (rG R) between them would be desirable from the standpoint of analogous types of traits in livestock. In the same context, undesirable (rG R)'s were found between epididymal fat pad percentage and body weight and between hind carcass percentage and body weight.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 24240342     DOI: 10.1007/BF00247559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  19 in total

1.  Selection for components related to body composition in mice: direct responses.

Authors:  E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Heterosis among lines of mice selected for body weight : 1. Growth.

Authors:  C K Bhuvanakumar; C B Lynch; R C Roberts; W G Hill
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Body composition and energetic efficiency in two lines of mice selected for rapid growth rate and their F1 crosses.

Authors:  E J Eisen; H Bakker; J Nagai
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  An experimental evaluation of genetic correlation.

Authors:  J J Rutledge; E J Eisen; J E Legates
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. I. Divergent selection.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. II. Selection in one direction.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  An analysis of short-term selection experiments.

Authors:  R H Richardson; K Kojima; H L Lucas
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Predicting percent fat in mice.

Authors:  E J Eisen; J M Leatherwood
Journal:  Growth       Date:  1981

9.  Rate, composition and efficiency of growth in mice selected for large and small body weight.

Authors:  B J Lang; J E Legates
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  The developmental characteristics of two strains of chickens selected for differences in mature abdominal fat pad size.

Authors:  M S Lilburn; R M Leach; E G Buss; R J Martin
Journal:  Growth       Date:  1982
View more
  10 in total

1.  Bayesian analyses of multiple epistatic QTL models for body weight and body composition in mice.

Authors:  Nengjun Yi; Denise K Zinniel; Kyoungmi Kim; Eugene J Eisen; Alfred Bartolucci; David B Allison; Daniel Pomp
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Selection for components related to body composition in mice: direct responses.

Authors:  E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Long-term restricted index selection in mice designed to change fat content without changing body size.

Authors:  E J Eisen; L S Benyon; J A Douglas
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Correlated responses in development and distribution of fat depots in mice selected for body composition traits.

Authors:  H Prasetyo; E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Restricted selection index in mice designed to change body fat without changing body weight: correlated responses.

Authors:  E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Restricted index selection in mice designed to change body fat without changing body weight: direct responses.

Authors:  E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Variation in within-bone stiffness measured by nanoindentation in mice bred for high levels of voluntary wheel running.

Authors:  Kevin M Middleton; Beth D Goldstein; Pradeep R Guduru; Julie F Waters; Scott A Kelly; Sharon M Swartz; T Garland
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Development of obesity following inactivation of a growth hormone transgene in mice.

Authors:  D Pomp; A M Oberbauer; J D Murray
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Use of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer to circumvent infertility caused by an inherited imperforate vagina in mice.

Authors:  B A Didion; M E Hauser; E J Eisen
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1991-06

10.  Effect of cryoprotectant and genetic selection for body fat content on embryonic cryosurvival in mice.

Authors:  T A Armbrust; E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.699

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.