Literature DB >> 24239490

An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy.

D Scott Kreiner1, Steven W Hwang2, John E Easa3, Daniel K Resnick4, Jamie L Baisden5, Shay Bess6, Charles H Cho7, Michael J DePalma8, Paul Dougherty9, Robert Fernand10, Gary Ghiselli11, Amgad S Hanna12, Tim Lamer13, Anthony J Lisi14, Daniel J Mazanec15, Richard J Meagher16, Robert C Nucci17, Rakesh D Patel18, Jonathan N Sembrano19, Anil K Sharma20, Jeffrey T Summers21, Christopher K Taleghani22, William L Tontz23, John F Toton24.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The objective of the North American Spine Society's (NASS) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy is to provide evidence-based recommendations to address key clinical questions surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. The guideline is intended to reflect contemporary treatment concepts for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy as reflected in the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of July 2011. The goals of the guideline recommendations are to assist in delivering optimum efficacious treatment and functional recovery from this spinal disorder.
PURPOSE: To provide an evidence-based educational tool to assist spine specialists in the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic review and evidence-based clinical guideline.
METHODS: This guideline is a product of the Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy Work Group of NASS' Evidence-Based Guideline Development Committee. The work group consisted of multidisciplinary spine care specialists trained in the principles of evidence-based analysis. A literature search addressing each question and using a specific search protocol was performed on English-language references found in Medline, Embase (Drugs and Pharmacology), and four additional evidence-based databases to identify articles. The relevant literature was then independently rated using the NASS-adopted standardized levels of evidence. An evidentiary table was created for each of the questions. Final recommendations to answer each clinical question were developed via work group discussion, and grades were assigned to the recommendations using standardized grades of recommendation. In the absence of Level I to IV evidence, work group consensus statements have been developed using a modified nominal group technique, and these statements are clearly identified as such in the guideline.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine clinical questions were formulated and addressed, and the answers are summarized in this article. The respective recommendations were graded by strength of the supporting literature, which was stratified by levels of evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical guideline has been created using the techniques of evidence-based medicine and best available evidence to aid practitioners in the care of patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, suggestions for future research, and all the references, is available electronically on the NASS Web site at http://www.spine.org/Pages/PracticePolicy/ClinicalCare/ClinicalGuidlines/Default.aspx and will remain updated on a timely schedule.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guideline; Lumbar disc herniation; Radiculopathy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24239490     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  131 in total

1.  Two-year real-world results of lumbar discectomy with bone-anchored annular closure in patients at high risk of reherniation.

Authors:  Ardeshir Ardeshiri; Larry E Miller; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Current concepts for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Thami Benzakour; Vasilios Igoumenou; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Ahmed Benzakour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Intraregional differences of perioperative management strategy for lumbar disc herniation: is the Devil really in the details?

Authors:  Cesare Zoia; Daniele Bongetta; Jacopo C Poli; Mariarosaria Verlotta; Raffaelino Pugliese; Paolo Gaetani
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-09

Review 4.  Microendoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  JuLiang He; ShanWen Xiao; ZhenJie Wu; ZhenChao Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Toward a Mechanism-Based Approach to Pain Diagnosis.

Authors:  Daniel Vardeh; Richard J Mannion; Clifford J Woolf
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Clinicians' perceptions around discectomy surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a survey of orthopaedic and neuro-surgeons in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Xiaolong Chen; Uphar Chamoli; Harold Fogel; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 7.  Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Raj M Amin; Nicholas S Andrade; Brian J Neuman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 8.  [Operative treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine].

Authors:  M Czabanka; C Thomé; F Ringel; B Meyer; S-O Eicker; V Rohde; M Stoffel; P Vajkoczy
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 9.  Conservative treatments for lumbar radicular pain.

Authors:  Gregory Fleury; Michael J Nissen; Stéphane Genevay
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-10

Review 10.  Surgery or physical activity in the management of sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Fernandez; Manuela L Ferreira; Kathryn M Refshauge; Jan Hartvigsen; Isabela R C Silva; Chris G Maher; Bart W Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.