Jason R Franz1, Michela Maletis2, Rodger Kram2. 1. Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0354, United States; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, United States. Electronic address: jrfranz2@wisc.edu. 2. Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0354, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reduced propulsive function during the push-off phase of walking plays a central role in the deterioration of walking ability with age. We used real-time propulsive feedback to test the hypothesis that old adults have an underutilized propulsive reserve available during walking. METHODS: 8 old adults (mean [SD], age: 72.1 [3.9] years) and 11 young adults (age: 21.0 [1.5] years) participated. For our primary aim, old subjects walked: 1) normally, 2) with visual feedback of their peak propulsive ground reaction forces, and 3) with visual feedback of their medial gastrocnemius electromyographic activity during push-off. We asked those subjects to match a target set to 20% and 40% greater propulsive force or push-off muscle activity than normal walking. We tested young subjects walking normally only to provide reference ground reaction force values. FINDINGS: Walking normally, old adults exerted 12.5% smaller peak propulsive forces than young adults (P<0.01). However, old adults significantly increased their propulsive forces and push-off muscle activities when we provided propulsive feedback. Most notably, force feedback elicited propulsive forces that were equal to or 10.5% greater than those of young adults (+20% target, P=0.87; +40% target, P=0.02). With electromyographic feedback, old adults significantly increased their push-off muscle activities but without increasing their propulsive forces. INTERPRETATION: Old adults with propulsive deficits have a considerable and underutilized propulsive reserve available during level walking. Further, real-time propulsive feedback represents a promising therapeutic strategy to improve the forward propulsion of old adults and thus maintain their walking ability and independence.
BACKGROUND: Reduced propulsive function during the push-off phase of walking plays a central role in the deterioration of walking ability with age. We used real-time propulsive feedback to test the hypothesis that old adults have an underutilized propulsive reserve available during walking. METHODS: 8 old adults (mean [SD], age: 72.1 [3.9] years) and 11 young adults (age: 21.0 [1.5] years) participated. For our primary aim, old subjects walked: 1) normally, 2) with visual feedback of their peak propulsive ground reaction forces, and 3) with visual feedback of their medial gastrocnemius electromyographic activity during push-off. We asked those subjects to match a target set to 20% and 40% greater propulsive force or push-off muscle activity than normal walking. We tested young subjects walking normally only to provide reference ground reaction force values. FINDINGS: Walking normally, old adults exerted 12.5% smaller peak propulsive forces than young adults (P<0.01). However, old adults significantly increased their propulsive forces and push-off muscle activities when we provided propulsive feedback. Most notably, force feedback elicited propulsive forces that were equal to or 10.5% greater than those of young adults (+20% target, P=0.87; +40% target, P=0.02). With electromyographic feedback, old adults significantly increased their push-off muscle activities but without increasing their propulsive forces. INTERPRETATION: Old adults with propulsive deficits have a considerable and underutilized propulsive reserve available during level walking. Further, real-time propulsive feedback represents a promising therapeutic strategy to improve the forward propulsion of old adults and thus maintain their walking ability and independence.
Authors: HaoYuan Hsiao; Thomas M Zabielski; Jacqueline A Palmer; Jill S Higginson; Stuart A Binder-Macleod Journal: J Biomech Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Katlin Genthe; Christopher Schenck; Steven Eicholtz; Laura Zajac-Cox; Steven Wolf; Trisha M Kesar Journal: Top Stroke Rehabil Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 2.119
Authors: Denise M Peters; Yann Thibaudier; Joan E Deffeyes; Gila T Baer; Heather B Hayes; Randy D Trumbower Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Reza Koiler; Elham Bakhshipour; Joseph Glutting; Amy Lalime; Dexter Kofa; Nancy Getchell Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 3.390