Literature DB >> 24238976

The effects of prosthetic ankle stiffness on ankle and knee kinematics, prosthetic limb loading, and net metabolic cost of trans-tibial amputee gait.

Matthew J Major1, Martin Twiste2, Laurence P J Kenney3, David Howard3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of commercially-available trans-tibial prosthetic components have been unable to provide clear insight into the relationships between prosthetic mechanical properties and user performance (i.e., gait quality and energy expenditure), the understanding of which is key to improving prosthesis design and prescription. Many of these studies have been limited by not characterising the mechanical properties of the tested prostheses and/or only considered level walking at self-selected speeds. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic investigation of the effects of ankle rotational stiffness on trans-tibial amputee gait during various walking conditions reflective of those encountered during daily ambulation.
METHODS: Ankle and knee kinematics, prosthetic limb normal ground reaction forces, and net metabolic cost were measured in five traumatic unilateral trans-tibial amputees during treadmill walking on the level, a 5% incline and a 5% decline whilst using an experimental articulated prosthetic foot with four different rotational stiffness setups and without changes in alignment between conditions.
FINDINGS: Overall, lower dorsiflexion stiffness resulted in greater prosthetic side dorsiflexion motion and sound side knee flexion, reduced normal ground reaction force during the loading phase of prosthetic stance and reduced net metabolic cost.
INTERPRETATION: Few differences were observed with changes in plantarflexion stiffness, most likely due to the foot achieving early foot flat. Low dorsiflexion stiffness generally improved gait performance seemingly due to easier tibial progression during stance. However, observed differences were small, suggesting that a wider range of walking and stiffness conditions would be useful to fully explore these effects in future studies.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24238976     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  16 in total

1.  Sensitivity of biomechanical outcomes to independent variations of hindfoot and forefoot stiffness in foot prostheses.

Authors:  Peter Gabriel Adamczyk; Michelle Roland; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Considering passive mechanical properties and patient user motor performance in lower limb prosthesis design optimization to enhance rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Nicholas P Fey
Journal:  Phys Ther Rev       Date:  2017-07-17

3.  Energy neutral: the human foot and ankle subsections combine to produce near zero net mechanical work during walking.

Authors:  Kota Z Takahashi; Kate Worster; Dustin A Bruening
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Maintenance of muscle strength retains a normal metabolic cost in simulated walking after transtibial limb loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth Russell Esposito; Ross H Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion.

Authors:  Max K Shepherd; Alejandro F Azocar; Matthew J Major; Elliott J Rouse
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  The foot and ankle structures reveal emergent properties analogous to passive springs during human walking.

Authors:  Erica A Hedrick; Steven J Stanhope; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of toe joint stiffness and toe shape on walking biomechanics.

Authors:  Eric C Honert; Gerasimos Bastas; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.956

8.  Focusing research efforts on the unique needs of women prosthesis users.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Andrew H Hansen; Elizabeth Russell Esposito
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2021-01-08

9.  Prosthetic energy return during walking increases after 3 weeks of adaptation to a new device.

Authors:  Samuel F Ray; Shane R Wurdeman; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  The effects of ankle stiffness on mechanics and energetics of walking with added loads: a prosthetic emulator study.

Authors:  Erica A Hedrick; Philippe Malcolm; Jason M Wilken; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.