Janne Weis1, Vibeke Zoffmann2, Ingrid Egerod3. 1. Department of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Steno Diabetes Centre A/S, Gentofte, Denmark. 3. Health and Medical Sciences and Trauma Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Aims of this article were (a) to explore how parents of premature infants experience guided family-centred care (GFCC), and (b) to compare how parents receiving GFCC versus standard care (SC) describe nurse-parent communication in the neonatal intensive care unit. BACKGROUND: Family-centred care (FCC) is acknowledged as fundamental to supporting parents of premature infants, and communication is central to this practice. Accordingly, nurses need good communication skills. GFCC is an intervention developed to improve nurse-parent communication in the neonatal intensive care unit. This intervention helps nurses to realize person-centred communication as an approach to optimize contemporary practice. DESIGN: Our qualitative study had a descriptive and comparative design using semi-structured interviews to explore the parent's experience of GFCC. METHODS: We conducted 10 dyad interviews with parents (n = 20) and two individual interviews with mothers of premature infants (n = 2). Parents in the intervention group versus SC group were 13 versus 9. Thematic analysis was applied. FINDINGS: GFCC was generally experienced as supportive. Three interrelated themes were identified that illustrated how the intervention helped parents cope as persons, parents and couples: (a) discovering and expressing emotions, (b) reaching a deeper level of communication, and (c) obtaining mutual understanding. In contrast, SC communication was more superficial and less structured. Factors such as inaccessibility of nurses, inability to ask for assistance and parent popularity impaired successful communication. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our study suggested that compared to SC, GFCC provided structured delivery of supportive communication between nurses and parents of premature infants. The intervention promoted the discovery of the parents' individual preferences and concerns, which enabled more focused communication, and set the stage for better nurse-parent and parent-parent understanding. We recommend GFCC as a method to improve communication in the neonatal intensive care unit.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Aims of this article were (a) to explore how parents of premature infants experience guided family-centred care (GFCC), and (b) to compare how parents receiving GFCC versus standard care (SC) describe nurse-parent communication in the neonatal intensive care unit. BACKGROUND: Family-centred care (FCC) is acknowledged as fundamental to supporting parents of premature infants, and communication is central to this practice. Accordingly, nurses need good communication skills. GFCC is an intervention developed to improve nurse-parent communication in the neonatal intensive care unit. This intervention helps nurses to realize person-centred communication as an approach to optimize contemporary practice. DESIGN: Our qualitative study had a descriptive and comparative design using semi-structured interviews to explore the parent's experience of GFCC. METHODS: We conducted 10 dyad interviews with parents (n = 20) and two individual interviews with mothers of premature infants (n = 2). Parents in the intervention group versus SC group were 13 versus 9. Thematic analysis was applied. FINDINGS:GFCC was generally experienced as supportive. Three interrelated themes were identified that illustrated how the intervention helped parents cope as persons, parents and couples: (a) discovering and expressing emotions, (b) reaching a deeper level of communication, and (c) obtaining mutual understanding. In contrast, SC communication was more superficial and less structured. Factors such as inaccessibility of nurses, inability to ask for assistance and parent popularity impaired successful communication. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our study suggested that compared to SC, GFCC provided structured delivery of supportive communication between nurses and parents of premature infants. The intervention promoted the discovery of the parents' individual preferences and concerns, which enabled more focused communication, and set the stage for better nurse-parent and parent-parent understanding. We recommend GFCC as a method to improve communication in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Authors: O Globus; L Leibovitch; A Maayan-Metzger; I Schushan-Eisen; I Morag; R Mazkereth; S Glasser; G Kaplan; T Strauss Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 2.521