Literature DB >> 24236418

Involving the public in systematic reviews: a narrative review of organizational approaches and eight case examples.

Jonathan Boote1, Wendy Baird, Anthea Sutton.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the recent literature on public involvement in the systematic review process. We examine how relevant organizations involve the public in their review processes and how the public are involved in individual reviews. We identified nine surveys or reports of public involvement in systematic reviews at an organizational level and eight examples of public involvement in individual reviews. The public was found to be involved in the following stages of the review process: topic prioritization; refining the scope of the review; suggesting, locating and appraising the literature; interpreting findings; and writing up the review. Numerous tensions, facilitating strategies and recommendations for good practice were identified. Future research directions are delineated.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24236418     DOI: 10.2217/cer.12.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  14 in total

1.  Stakeholder engagement in a hypertension and diabetes prevention research program: Description and lessons learned.

Authors:  Archana Shrestha; Dipesh Tamrakar; Bhawana Shrestha; Biraj Man Karmacharya; Abha Shrestha; Prajjwal Pyakurel; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Laura P Forsythe; Lauren E Ellis; Lauren Edmundson; Raj Sabharwal; Alison Rein; Kristen Konopka; Lori Frank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Amy Price; Sara Schroter; Rosamund Snow; Melissa Hicks; Rebecca Harmston; Sophie Staniszewska; Sam Parker; Tessa Richards
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  A systematic scoping review of the evidence for consumer involvement in organisations undertaking systematic reviews: focus on Cochrane.

Authors:  Richard F Morley; Gill Norman; Su Golder; Polly Griffith
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2016-12-21

5.  Patient involvement in a qualitative meta-synthesis: lessons learnt.

Authors:  Kerin Bayliss; Bella Starling; Karim Raza; Eva C Johansson; Codruta Zabalan; Susan Moore; Diana Skingle; Tiina Jasinski; Susan Thomas; Rebecca Stack
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2016-05-12

6.  The effectiveness of interventions to achieve co-ordinated multidisciplinary care and reduce hospital use for people with chronic diseases: study protocol for a systematic review of reviews.

Authors:  Sarah Damery; Sarah Flanagan; Gill Combes
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-08

7.  Involving service users in trials: developing a standard operating procedure.

Authors:  Bridie Angela Evans; Emma Bedson; Philip Bell; Hayley Hutchings; Lesley Lowes; David Rea; Anne Seagrove; Stefan Siebert; Graham Smith; Helen Snooks; Marie Thomas; Kym Thorne; Ian Russell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Discharge interventions for older patients leaving hospital: protocol for a systematic meta-review.

Authors:  Elaine O'Connell Francischetto; Sarah Damery; Sarah Davies; Gill Combes
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-16

9.  End-user involvement in a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research of non-pharmacological interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder delivered in school settings: reflections on the impacts and challenges.

Authors:  Jo Thompson Coon; Ruth Gwernan-Jones; Darren Moore; Michelle Richardson; Catherine Shotton; Will Pritchard; Christopher Morris; Ken Stein; Tamsin Ford
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Methods to identify and prioritize patient-centered outcomes for use in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Evan Mayo-Wilson; Asieh Golozar; Terrie Cowley; Nicole Fusco; Gillian Gresham; Jennifer Haythornthwaite; Elizabeth Tolbert; Jennifer L Payne; Lori Rosman; Susan Hutfless; Joseph K Canner; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.