Sergio Olate1, Benjamin Weber, Alvaro Marín. 1. Department of Oral Implantology, Dental School, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile. ; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this work is to evaluate a surgical technique for mobilization of mal posed dental implant in anterior area. METHODS: A 38-year-old patient consulted our unit for esthetic dissatisfaction with the implant treatment of a central incisor. An implant was observed in 11 and 21, where 11 was 3 mm above the ideal limit, with excessive vestibular angulation. The choice was made to perform a segmental osteotomy and mobilize the bone block and the implant down and forward; a bone block extracted from the mandibular ramus was installed between the implant block and the bed to stabilize the segment. RESULTS: After 4 months, a conventional fixed prosthesis was created and the esthetic result achieved was close to what the patient wanted, with no need for further surgery. The surgical condition was stabilized and maintained for the long-time and no complications how necrosis, infection or bone defects was present. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the procedure is efficient, and the biological arguments in favor of the procedure are discussed.
PURPOSE: The aim of this work is to evaluate a surgical technique for mobilization of mal posed dental implant in anterior area. METHODS: A 38-year-old patient consulted our unit for esthetic dissatisfaction with the implant treatment of a central incisor. An implant was observed in 11 and 21, where 11 was 3 mm above the ideal limit, with excessive vestibular angulation. The choice was made to perform a segmental osteotomy and mobilize the bone block and the implant down and forward; a bone block extracted from the mandibular ramus was installed between the implant block and the bed to stabilize the segment. RESULTS: After 4 months, a conventional fixed prosthesis was created and the esthetic result achieved was close to what the patient wanted, with no need for further surgery. The surgical condition was stabilized and maintained for the long-time and no complications how necrosis, infection or bone defects was present. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the procedure is efficient, and the biological arguments in favor of the procedure are discussed.