Makoto Aihara1, James D Lindsey, Robert N Weinreb. 1. Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0946, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess aqueous humor dynamics in mouse eyes. METHODS: Aqueous humor dynamics of NIH Swiss White mouse were assessed with an injection and aspiration system, using fine glass microneedles. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by a microneedle connected to a pressure transducer. Episcleral venous pressure (EVP) was measured by gradually lowering intracameral pressure until blood reflux into Schlemm's canal was observed. Outflow facility (C) was determined based on constant pressure perfusion measurements obtained at two different IOPs. Aqueous volume (V(a)) was determined by direct measurement of aspirated aqueous humor. Aqueous humor production (F(a)) was measured by the dilution method with rhodamine-dextran. Conventional and uveoscleral outflow (F(c) and F(u), respectively), as well as the turnover rate of aqueous humor, were also calculated. RESULTS: IOP and EVP were 15.7 +/- 2.0 and 9.5 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, respectively (n = 20). F(a) was 0.18 +/- 0.05 microL/min (mean +/- SD; n = 8). C was 0.0051 +/- 0.0006 microL/min per mm Hg (n = 8). Estimated F(c) and F(u) were 0.032 and 0.148 microL/min, respectively. F(c) was 18% of F(a). F(u) was 82% of F(a). V(a) was 5.9 +/- 0.5 microL (n = 8). The calculated turnover rate of aqueous humor was 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The mouse eye has similar aqueous production and aqueous humor turnover rate as the human eye. The presence of both conventional and uveoscleral outflow suggests that the mouse is a useful model system for further investigations of the biology of aqueous dynamics.
PURPOSE: To assess aqueous humor dynamics in mouse eyes. METHODS: Aqueous humor dynamics of NIH Swiss White mouse were assessed with an injection and aspiration system, using fine glass microneedles. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by a microneedle connected to a pressure transducer. Episcleral venous pressure (EVP) was measured by gradually lowering intracameral pressure until blood reflux into Schlemm's canal was observed. Outflow facility (C) was determined based on constant pressure perfusion measurements obtained at two different IOPs. Aqueous volume (V(a)) was determined by direct measurement of aspirated aqueous humor. Aqueous humor production (F(a)) was measured by the dilution method with rhodamine-dextran. Conventional and uveoscleral outflow (F(c) and F(u), respectively), as well as the turnover rate of aqueous humor, were also calculated. RESULTS: IOP and EVP were 15.7 +/- 2.0 and 9.5 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, respectively (n = 20). F(a) was 0.18 +/- 0.05 microL/min (mean +/- SD; n = 8). C was 0.0051 +/- 0.0006 microL/min per mm Hg (n = 8). Estimated F(c) and F(u) were 0.032 and 0.148 microL/min, respectively. F(c) was 18% of F(a). F(u) was 82% of F(a). V(a) was 5.9 +/- 0.5 microL (n = 8). The calculated turnover rate of aqueous humor was 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The mouse eye has similar aqueous production and aqueous humor turnover rate as the human eye. The presence of both conventional and uveoscleral outflow suggests that the mouse is a useful model system for further investigations of the biology of aqueous dynamics.
Authors: Tomokazu Souma; Stuart W Tompson; Benjamin R Thomson; Owen M Siggs; Krishnakumar Kizhatil; Shinji Yamaguchi; Liang Feng; Vachiranee Limviphuvadh; Kristina N Whisenhunt; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Tammy L Yanovitch; Luba Kalaydjieva; Dimitar N Azmanov; Simone Finzi; Lucia Mauri; Shahrbanou Javadiyan; Emmanuelle Souzeau; Tiger Zhou; Alex W Hewitt; Bethany Kloss; Kathryn P Burdon; David A Mackey; Keri F Allen; Jonathan B Ruddle; Sing-Hui Lim; Steve Rozen; Khanh-Nhat Tran-Viet; Xiaorong Liu; Simon John; Janey L Wiggs; Francesca Pasutto; Jamie E Craig; Jing Jin; Susan E Quaggin; Terri L Young Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Darryl R Overby; Jacques Bertrand; Ozan-Yüksel Tektas; Alexandra Boussommier-Calleja; Martin Schicht; C Ross Ethier; David F Woodward; W Daniel Stamer; Elke Lütjen-Drecoll Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Sandeep Kumar; Shaily Shah; Emily Rose Deutsch; Hai Michael Tang; John Danias Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Benjamin Bakall; Precious McLaughlin; J Brett Stanton; Youwen Zhang; H Criss Hartzell; Lihua Y Marmorstein; Alan D Marmorstein Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 4.799