Literature DB >> 24234579

Isokinetic performance in low back pain patients: The predictive power of the Self-Efficacy Scale.

K K Kaivanto1, A M Estlander, G B Moneta, H Vanharanta.   

Abstract

The Self-Efficacy Scale (SES) has been found to predict isokinetic performance better than anthropometric variables. This study tests the predictive power of SES further against other measures of efficacy expectancies as well as measures of depression and perceived disability. A group of 105 chronic back pain patients was administered Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), SES, the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire (OSWESTRY). Total isokinetic work done was measured at slow, medium and high speeds, for which multiple regression models were fitted controlling for sex, age, weight and height. The results confirmed SES to be the best overall predictor of isokinetic performance. BDI was not significant as a predictor of isokinetic performance. The models also revealed that SES predicts less well with increases in the test speed, particularly in extension. These results provide further evidence of the diagnostic value of SES relative to OSWESTRY and PSEQ.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 24234579     DOI: 10.1007/BF02109912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  13 in total

1.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

2.  Comparison of cognitive-behavioral group treatment and an alternative non-psychological treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Michael K Nicholas; Peter H Wilson; Jocelyn Goyen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury.

Authors:  S J Bigos; M C Battié; D M Spengler; L D Fisher; W E Fordyce; T H Hansson; A L Nachemson; M D Wortley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  Trunk strength testing with iso-machines. Part 1: Review of a decade of scientific evidence.

Authors:  M Newton; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease.

Authors:  P M Bongers; C R de Winter; M A Kompier; V H Hildebrandt
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Predictors of low back pain disability.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; W Cats-Baril
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Low-back pain, its origin and risk indicators.

Authors:  H Riihimäki
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.024

9.  Expectancies and functional impairment in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  James R Council; David K Ahern; Michael J Follick; Curtis L Kline
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Anthropometric variables, self-efficacy beliefs, and pain and disability ratings on the isokinetic performance of low back pain patients.

Authors:  A M Estlander; H Vanharanta; G B Moneta; K Kaivanto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain.

Authors:  L Gibson; J Strong
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-09

Review 2.  Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Jl Sullivan; Michael Feuerstein; Robert Gatchel; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

3.  Are Psychologic Factors Associated With Shoulder Scores After Rotator Cuff Surgery?

Authors:  Alison M Thorpe; Peter B O'Sullivan; Tim Mitchell; Mark Hurworth; Jonathan Spencer; Grant Booth; Sven Goebel; Paul Khoo; Aaron Tay; Anne Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Strategies to encourage physical activity in patients with hemophilia to improve quality of life.

Authors:  Miwa Goto; Hideyuki Takedani; Kazuhiko Yokota; Nobuhiko Haga
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2016-05-17

5.  Determinants of pain and functioning in knee osteoarthritis: a one-year prospective study.

Authors:  Eeva-Eerika Helminen; Sanna H Sinikallio; Anna L Valjakka; Rauni H Väisänen-Rouvali; Jari Pa Arokoski
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.477

6.  Effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention for knee osteoarthritis pain: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eeva-Eerika Helminen; Sanna H Sinikallio; Anna L Valjakka; Rauni H Väisänen-Rouvali; Jari P Arokoski
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Evaluation of a novel intervention to improve physical activity for adults with whiplash associated disorders: Protocol for a multiple-baseline, single case experimental study.

Authors:  Kelly M Clanchy; Sean M Tweedy; Robyn L Tate; Michele Sterling; Melissa A Day; Jane Nikles; Carrie Ritchie
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-09-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.