Literature DB >> 24233245

Scotopic hue percepts in natural scenes.

Sarah L Elliott1, Dingcai Cao.   

Abstract

Traditional trichromatic theories of color vision conclude that color perception is not possible under scotopic illumination in which only one type of photoreceptor, rods, is active. The current study demonstrates the existence of scotopic color perception and indicates that perceived hue is influenced by spatial context and top-down processes of color perception. Experiment 1 required observers to report the perceived hue in various natural scene images under purely rod-mediated vision. The results showed that when the test patch had low variation in the luminance distribution and was a decrement in luminance compared to the surrounding area, reddish or orangish percepts were more likely to be reported compared to all other percepts. In contrast, when the test patch had a high variation and was an increment in luminance, the probability of perceiving blue, green, or yellow hues increased. In addition, when observers had a strong, but singular, daylight hue association for the test patch, color percepts were reported more often and hues appeared more saturated compared to patches with no daylight hue association. This suggests that experience in daylight conditions modulates the bottom-up processing for rod-mediated color perception. In Experiment 2, observers reported changes in hue percepts for a test ring surrounded by inducing rings that varied in spatial context. In sum, the results challenge the classic view that rod vision is achromatic and suggest that scotopic hue perception is mediated by cortical mechanisms.

Keywords:  hue percepts; natural image statistics; scotopic color vision

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24233245      PMCID: PMC3829393          DOI: 10.1167/13.13.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  38 in total

1.  Scotopic visual efficiency: constraints by optics, receptor properties, and rod pooling.

Authors:  G L Savage; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Matching rod percepts with cone stimuli.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny; Vivianne C Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Different sensations from cones with the same photopigment.

Authors:  Heidi Hofer; Ben Singer; David R Williams
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The role of layered scene representations in color appearance.

Authors:  Daniel Wollschläger; Barton L Anderson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  HUMAN VISION AND THE SPECTRUM.

Authors:  G Wald
Journal:  Science       Date:  1945-06-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The influence of luminance level on visual sensitivity to color differences.

Authors:  W R J BROWN
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1951-10

7.  Every discrete, finite image is uniquely determined by its dipole histogram.

Authors:  C Chubb; J I Yellott
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Rod influence on hue-scaling functions.

Authors:  S L Buck; R Knight; G Fowler; B Hunt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Seeing forbidden colors.

Authors:  Vincent A Billock; Brian H Tsou
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.142

10.  Rod inputs to macaque ganglion cells.

Authors:  B B Lee; V C Smith; J Pokorny; J Kremers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-22

Review 2.  Plasticity in perception: insights from color vision deficiencies.

Authors:  Zoey J Isherwood; Daniel S Joyce; Mohana Kuppuswamy Parthasarathy; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Fac Rev       Date:  2020-11-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.