Literature DB >> 1413549

Scotopic visual efficiency: constraints by optics, receptor properties, and rod pooling.

G L Savage1, M S Banks.   

Abstract

We studied the influence of optics, photoreceptor properties, and rod pooling on scotopic contrast sensitivity by comparing the performance of an ideal discriminator to that of human observers. Comparisons of human and ideal contrast sensitivities indicated that preretinal factors and summation area were not sufficient to explain the shape of the human CSF. Spatial pooling of rods was explored as a possible explanation of this discrepancy. Our highest efficiency, expressed in terms of a human/ideal contrast sensitivity ratio, was about 1:3 (0.33) for a contrast discrimination task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1413549     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90181-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

1.  Evidence against age-related enlargements of ganglion cell receptive field centers under scotopic conditions.

Authors:  Brooke E Schefrin; Monika Hauser; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Scotopic hue percepts in natural scenes.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivity differences between young and old adults.

Authors:  Cynthia L Clark; Joseph L Hardy; Vicki J Volbrecht; John S Werner
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Loss of sensitivity in an analog neural circuit.

Authors:  Bart G Borghuis; Peter Sterling; Robert G Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.