Jumin Sunde1, Julia B Webb, Page C Moore, Michael B Gluth, John L Dornhoffer. 1. *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; †Department of Audiology, Arkansas Children's Hospital; and ‡Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term adverse cochlear implant (CI) outcomes resulting in revision surgery including CI reimplantation (CIR). PATIENTS: Pediatric and adult patients requiring revision procedures after CI placement. INTERVENTION(S): Revision surgery on cochlear implant patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Device type, length of total device follow-up, time to device failure, cause for failure, peak pre-CIR and post-CIR audiometric performance, rate of surgical site complications, and operative findings. RESULTS: A total of 317 patients, receiving 439 CIs between January 2000 and April 2012, met inclusion criteria for this series. For the patients implanted at our institution, the revision surgery rate was 4.1%, with a CIR rate of 3.0%. The CIR rates among the pediatric and adult populations were 5.0% and 1.3%, respectively (p = 0.0336). The rate of revision procedures because of failed fixation or device extrusion was 0.9%. Device failure was experienced in 8 patients in our series, with 75% occurring with the CI24R (CS) device. CONCLUSION: All reimplanted patients with available data had good audiometric outcomes, with the exception of those reimplanted for soft failure who had poor immediate auditory function. Using the manufacturers' recommended surgical technique, including drilling a bony recess with suture fixation, very low surgical revision rates were achieved. Pediatric patients experienced significantly higher complications requiring CIR. All hard failures in this series occurred in the pediatric group and in a single device. Continued follow-up will be needed to determine if additional devices will succumb to this mode of failure.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term adverse cochlear implant (CI) outcomes resulting in revision surgery including CI reimplantation (CIR). PATIENTS: Pediatric and adult patients requiring revision procedures after CI placement. INTERVENTION(S): Revision surgery on cochlear implant patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Device type, length of total device follow-up, time to device failure, cause for failure, peak pre-CIR and post-CIR audiometric performance, rate of surgical site complications, and operative findings. RESULTS: A total of 317 patients, receiving 439 CIs between January 2000 and April 2012, met inclusion criteria for this series. For the patients implanted at our institution, the revision surgery rate was 4.1%, with a CIR rate of 3.0%. The CIR rates among the pediatric and adult populations were 5.0% and 1.3%, respectively (p = 0.0336). The rate of revision procedures because of failed fixation or device extrusion was 0.9%. Device failure was experienced in 8 patients in our series, with 75% occurring with the CI24R (CS) device. CONCLUSION: All reimplanted patients with available data had good audiometric outcomes, with the exception of those reimplanted for soft failure who had poor immediate auditory function. Using the manufacturers' recommended surgical technique, including drilling a bony recess with suture fixation, very low surgical revision rates were achieved. Pediatric patients experienced significantly higher complications requiring CIR. All hard failures in this series occurred in the pediatric group and in a single device. Continued follow-up will be needed to determine if additional devices will succumb to this mode of failure.