Literature DB >> 24232049

Nationwide outcomes of nontrauma splenectomy.

A Y Zemlyak, P D Colavita, V A Augenstein, A L Walters, A E Lincourt, R F Sing, B Todd Heniford.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Due to the impact of LeapFrog and many scientific publications, regionalization for solid-organ operations gained momentum in the early 2000s. This study examines the effects of regionalization for medically indicated, nontrauma splenectomies (NTSs) in the USA.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data were analyzed for NTS based on International Classification of Disease Ninth Revision Clinical Modification codes for 1998–1999 (the 1990s) and 2008–2009 (the 2000s). The hospitals in the NIS were stratified by volume and divided into high volume (HV), medium volume, and low-volume (LV) terciles based on the annual volume of splenectomies performed (<5, 5–10, and 11+, respectively). Demographics, comorbidities, complications, admission status, and in-patient mortality were recorded. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were utilized.
RESULTS: NIS recorded 4,293 NTS performed in the 1990s and 3,384 in the 2000s. Despite the decrease in operative volume, regionalization did not occur: in the first decade 30, 37, and 33 % of cases occurred in LV center (LVC), medium volume center, and HV center (HVC), respectively, compared with 34, 30, and 36 % in the second decade (p < 0.001). Patients were older in low-volume hospitals (LVC) than in high-volume hospitals (HVC) in both decades (in the 1990s: 45.3 vs. 52.7 years, p < 0.001; in the 2000s: 49.1 vs. 54.5 years, p < 0.001). The Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were not different in LVC compared with HVC in both decades (the 1990s: 1.31 vs. 1.23, p = 0.73; the 2000s: 1.54 vs. 1.41, p = 0.72). In both decades, LVC had more emergent admissions than HVC (20.3 vs. 16.8 %, p = 0.03; 28.8 vs. 19.5 %, p < 0.001). Complication rates were higher in LVC in both decades (the 1990s: 16.9 vs. 13.6 %, p = 0.02; the 2000s: 19.8 vs. 15.5 %, p = 0.006). Mortality was not different for HVC and LVC in both decades (the 1990s: 3.75 vs. 4.27, p = 0.49; the 2000s: 2.94 vs. 4.03, p = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: NTS has not been affected by regionalization, which is dissimilar to other solid-organ abdominal procedures. Indeed, the benefit of regionalization for splenectomy has not been established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24232049     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3287-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan F Finks; Nicholas H Osborne; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure.

Authors:  T A Gordon; G P Burleyson; J M Tielsch; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Nationwide inpatient sample: have antireflux procedures undergone regionalization?

Authors:  Paul D Colavita; Igor Belyansky; Amanda L Walters; Victor B Tsirline; Alla Y Zemlyak; Amy E Lincourt; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery.

Authors:  Vivian Ho; Martin J Heslin; Huifeng Yun; Lee Howard
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Recent trends of hepatic resection in Canada: 1995-2004.

Authors:  Ryan J McColl; Xiaoqing You; William A Ghali; Gilaad Kaplan; Robert Myers; Elijah Dixon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Estimating the potential impact of regionalizing health care delivery based on volume standards versus risk-adjusted mortality rate.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Turner M Osler; Dana B Mukamel; Andrew W Dick
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-06-10       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade.

Authors:  Warren J Gasper; David V Glidden; Chengshi Jin; Lawrence W Way; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Are high-volume surgeons and hospitals the most important predictors of in-hospital outcome for colon cancer resection?

Authors:  Clifford Y Ko; John T Chang; Saima Chaudhry; Gerald Kominski
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care.

Authors:  Karyn B Stitzenberg; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Russell B Starkey; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.