Literature DB >> 32745942

Profiles of motivations for responsible drinking among college students: A self-determination theory perspective.

Dylan K Richards1, Matthew R Pearson2, Craig A Field3.   

Abstract

The present study sought to identify motivational profiles for responsible drinking from a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective among college students. We used data from 507 students who reported drinking alcohol at least once in the past 3 months that were recruited from a random sample of undergraduate students at a Southwestern university. Participants completed an online survey that included measures assessing amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, and autonomous motivation for responsible drinking as well as other SDT constructs, alcohol protective behavioral strategies (PBS), and alcohol use/problems. A latent profile analysis suggested that a 3-class solution was optimal: a "High Quality" class (i.e., relatively high on introjected regulation and autonomous motivation but relatively low on all other types of motivation), a "High Quantity" class (i.e., relatively high on all types of motivation), and a "Low Quantity" class (i.e., relatively low on all types of motivation). The High Quality class reported the highest level of psychological need satisfaction and dispositional autonomy, followed by the High Quantity class, with the Low Quantity class reporting the lowest levels. The High Quality class reported more frequent use of serious harm reduction PBS than the High Quantity class. Generally, both the High Quality and High Quantity classes reported more frequent use of all types of PBS and less alcohol use/problems than the Low Quantity class. These results provide initial support for different profiles of motivations based on SDT for responsible drinking. Potential implications for alcohol interventions among college students are discussed.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  College students; Latent profile analysis; Motivation; Responsible drinking; Self-determination theory

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32745942      PMCID: PMC7839311          DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  29 in total

Review 1.  Surveying the damage: a review of research on consequences of alcohol misuse in college populations.

Authors:  H Wesley Perkins
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Suppl       Date:  2002-03

2.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains.

Authors:  R M Ryan; J P Connell
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1989-11

3.  Measuring alcohol-related protective behavioral strategies among college students: further examination of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Eric R Pederson; Joseph W Labrie; Amanda G Ferrier; M Dolores Cimini
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2007-09

4.  A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health.

Authors:  Nikos Ntoumanis; Johan Y Y Ng; Andrew Prestwich; Eleanor Quested; Jennie E Hancox; Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani; Edward L Deci; Richard M Ryan; Chris Lonsdale; Geoffrey C Williams
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-02-03

5.  Exploring the Relationship Between Stimulant Use and Gambling in College Students.

Authors:  Irene Markman Geisner; David Huh; Jessica M Cronce; Ty W Lostutter; Jason Kilmer; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-09

6.  How college students conceptualize and practice responsible drinking.

Authors:  Adam E Barry; Patricia Goodson
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2011

Review 7.  Protective behavioral strategies for reducing alcohol involvement: a review of the methodological issues.

Authors:  Mark A Prince; Kate B Carey; Stephen A Maisto
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 8.  Use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies among college students: a critical review.

Authors:  Matthew R Pearson
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-08-23

Review 9.  Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emily E Tanner-Smith; Mark W Lipsey
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2014-09-16

10.  Further validation of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire for assessing motivations for responsible drinking: A test of self-determination theory.

Authors:  Dylan K Richards; Matthew R Pearson; Craig A Field
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  4 in total

1.  Understanding alcohol harm reduction behaviors from the perspective of self-determination theory: A research agenda.

Authors:  Dylan K Richards; Matthew R Pearson; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Addict Res Theory       Date:  2020-12-23

2.  A comprehensive examination of alcohol-related motivations among college students: Unique relations of drinking motives and motivations for drinking responsibly.

Authors:  Dylan K Richards; Matthew R Pearson; Craig A Field
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  Examining Cross-Country and Sex Differences on a Comprehensive Assessment of Protective Behavioral Strategies for Alcohol.

Authors:  Frank J Schwebel; Andrew P Weinstein; Dylan K Richards; Adrian J Bravo; Matthew R Pearson
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Motivational Profiles in Unemployment: A Self-Determination Perspective.

Authors:  Leoni van der Vaart; Anja Van den Broeck; Sebastiaan Rothmann; Hans De Witte
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.