Literature DB >> 24227906

P600-like positivity and Left Anterior Negativity responses are elicited by semantic reversibility in nonanomalous sentences.

Jed A Meltzer1, Allen R Braun.   

Abstract

ERPs are commonly elicited by semantic and syntactic violations in sentences, leading to proposals that they reflect neural activity underlying ordinary language comprehension. We examined ERPs in an auditory sentence-picture-matching task, using nonanomalous sentences that were either semantically reversible, (boy pushes girl) or irreversible, (boy eats apple). Timelocked to the end of the critical clause, which occurred in the middle of a longer sentence, we observed an enhanced central-posterior positivity in response to the reversible sentences. The topography of this response is consistent with the P600 potential reported in studies of syntactic anomalies and other manipulations related to sentence structure. Following the end of the sentence, during a memory delay period prior to picture onset, reversible sentences also evoked a protracted anterior negativity, predominantly on the left. This negativity was stronger for sentences containing relative clauses compared to simple active sentences, but did not differ between object-embedded and the less complex subject-embedded clauses. The observation of a P600 occurring selectively in reversible sentences supports the interpretation of that potential as reflecting the syntactic processing of thematic relationships, as irreversible sentences contained alternative cues for thematic roles. The left anterior negativity likely reflects later processes of rehearsal and reanalysis of sentence content in working memory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; ERP; LAN; N400; language; reanalysis; syntax; working memory

Year:  2013        PMID: 24227906      PMCID: PMC3822000          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurolinguistics        ISSN: 0911-6044            Impact factor:   1.710


  42 in total

1.  An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences.

Authors:  J Weckerly; M Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Phillip J Holcomb; Tatiana Sitnikova; Douglas Greve; Anders M Dale; David Caplan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Determinants of bold signal correlates of processing object-extracted relative clauses.

Authors:  Evan Chen; W Caroline West; Gloria Waters; David Caplan
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Short-term memory storage and retention: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  D S Ruchkin; R Johnson; H Canoune; W Ritter
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-11

6.  The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Donna A Kreher; Tatiana Sitnikova; David N Caplan; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.

Authors:  J W King; M Kutas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  A comparison of the electrophysiological effects of formal and repetition priming.

Authors:  M C Doyle; M D Rugg; T Wells
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Syntax, concepts, and logic in the temporal dynamics of language comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Karsten Steinhauer; John E Drury; Paul Portner; Matthew Walenski; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  3 in total

1.  From incoherence to mirth: neuro-cognitive processing of garden-path jokes.

Authors:  Bastian Mayerhofer; Annekathrin Schacht
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-12

2.  Combining Different Tools for EEG Analysis to Study the Distributed Character of Language Processing.

Authors:  Armando Freitas da Rocha; Flávia Benevides Foz; Alfredo Pereira
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-02

3.  Neural correlates of thematic role assignment for passives in Standard Indonesian.

Authors:  Bernard A J Jap; Yu-Yin Hsu; Stephen Politzer-Ahles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.