Literature DB >> 24227108

High recaptures and long sampling range of pheromone traps for fall web worm mothHyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) males.

Q H Zhang1, F Schlyter.   

Abstract

Newly emerged males ofHyphantria cunea (Drury) (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae), marked with different fluorescent colors, were recaptured by pheromone trapping. Three Uni-traps, baited with (3Z,6Z)9,10-epoxyheneicosadiene, (9Z,12Z,15Z)octadecatrienal, and (3Z,6Z)9,10-epoxyheneicosa-triene in a 1:10:1 ratio, total 6 mg/dispenser, were placed in a line 15 m apart, perpendicular to the dominant wind direction, and checked after 12, 36, and 60 hr. At dusk, releases of 10-25 males were made over distances from 30 to 250 m, during 4 periods over a soybean field (nonhost plant). Recapture rates were high; of a total of 176 males released, 115 were recaptured with 88% of these within 12 hours. Between 40 and 100% of males were recovered over shorter distances (30-150 m), and between 10-24% at longer distances (200 and 250 m). No other species or unmarked males were captured. The trapping period showed little effect on recaptures. The central trap of the three traps had somewhat higher catches, but the slope of the regression of recapture over distance did not differ among traps. There was a significant decline of recapture over distance (r=-0.56) for catches of individual traps but a large scatter. Summed recaptures per distance gave less scatter and hadr=-0.86, allowing calculation of the maximum sampling range (R s ) after 60 hr as 340 m with a 95% confidence interval of 190-710 m (regression of arcsin √p and √R). The area of sampling, found by integrating the probability function of recapture over distance, from the source to maximumR, was 7 ha. The high recapture rates and the longR,. compared to those in the literature for other taxa, indicate that pheromone traps are highly efficient sampling devices in this species.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24227108     DOI: 10.1007/BF02028504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  4 in total

1.  Sampling range of male sweetpotato weevils (Cylas formicarius elegantulus) (Summers) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to pheromone traps: Influence of pheromone dosage and lure age.

Authors:  L J Mason; R K Jansson; R R Heath
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Effective attraction radius : A method for comparing species attractants and determining densities of flying insects.

Authors:  J A Byers; O Anderbrant; J Löqvist
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Sex pheromone of the fall webworm moth,Hyphantria cunea.

Authors:  A S Hill; B G Kovalev; L N Nikolaeva; W L Roelofs
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The analysis of olfactory communication among animals.

Authors:  W H Bossert; E O Wilson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 2.691

  4 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pheromone-Based Pest Management in China: Past, Present, and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Gen Zhong Cui; Junwei Jerry Zhu
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Capture rates of the European pine sawfly, Neodiprion sertifer, in pheromone traps, with special regard to effects of wind speed.

Authors:  F Ostrand; O Anderbrant; P Jönsson; P Lyytikäinen-Saarenmaa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Pheromones and Other Semiochemicals for Monitoring Rare and Endangered Species.

Authors:  Mattias C Larsson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Repurposing a traditional Japanese method of pest control for wintering pine moths, Komo-trap, for use against summer and winter populations of fall webworms.

Authors:  Osamu K Mikami; Misaki Takamatsu; Rika Yarita
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.