Literature DB >> 24225640

Virally expressed connexin26 restores gap junction function in the cochlea of conditional Gjb2 knockout mice.

Q Yu1, Y Wang2, Q Chang3, J Wang3, S Gong4, H Li2, X Lin3.   

Abstract

Mutations in GJB2, which codes for the gap junction (GJ) protein connexin26 (Cx26), are the most common causes of human nonsyndromic hereditary deafness. We inoculated modified adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors into the scala media of early postnatal conditional Gjb2 knockout mice to drive exogenous Cx26 expression. We found extensive virally expressed Cx26 in cells lining the scala media, and intercellular GJ network was re-established in the organ of Corti of mutant mouse cochlea. Widespread ectopic Cx26 expression neither formed ectopic GJs nor affected normal hearing thresholds in wild-type (WT) mice, suggesting that autonomous cellular mechanisms regulate proper membrane trafficking of exogenously expressed Cx26 and govern the functional manifestation of them. Functional recovery of GJ-mediated coupling among the supporting cells was observed. We found that both cell death in the organ of Corti and degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons in the cochlea of mutant mice were substantially reduced, although auditory brainstem responses did not show significant hearing improvement. This is the first report demonstrating that virally mediated gene therapy restored extensive GJ intercellular network among cochlear non-sensory cells in vivo. Such a treatment performed at early postnatal stages resulted in a partial rescue of disease phenotypes in the cochlea of the mutant mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24225640      PMCID: PMC3881370          DOI: 10.1038/gt.2013.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene Ther        ISSN: 0969-7128            Impact factor:   5.250


Introduction

Genetic mutations are responsible for about half of all congenital hearing loss cases, which have a prevalence of about 1-2 in every 1,000 births in humans [1-2]. Genetic studies of hearing loss have identified more than 100 deafness genes and established that monogenic mutations in these genes cause the disease [3]. Importantly, epidemiological studies have revealed that a large proportion of genetic deafness cases (30-50% among various ethnic groups) is caused by loss-of-function mutations in a single gene, GJB2, which codes for a major cochlear gap junction (GJ) protein, connexin26 (Cx26) [4-7]. GJs generally provide an extensive network which allows for intercellular coupling among non-sensory cells in the mammalian cochlea. However, the molecular mechanisms for deafness caused by GJB2 mutations are currently unclear. No treatment is available to correct the root cellular and genetic causes of sensorineural hearing loss caused by such mutations. With the availability of Cx26 null mouse models [8-10], a variety of methods (e.g., gene therapy, stem cell transfer, etc.) may be tested to restore hearing in these mutant mice. In 2005 limited success in correcting a specific dominant GJB2 point mutation in a mouse model using a RNA interference approach was reported [11]. For the more common form of GJB2 functionally-null mutations, one promising treatment lies in virus-mediated connexin expression to re-establish the extensive GJ intercellular network in affected cochlear cells. Experiments have demonstrated that exogenous reporter genes (e.g., green fluorescent protein (GFP)) are expressed by various types of viral vectors in the inner ear with different transduction efficiencies and cell specificities [12-16]. One recent report using bovine adeno-associated virus vectors shows that in vitro treatment could restore Cx26 protein expression and rescue gap junction coupling in cultured cochlear tissues isolated from conditional Cx26 null-mutant mice [17]. However, the in vivo feasibility of gene therapy in correcting the most common form of human genetic deafness, GJB2 null mutations, remains to be investigated. Although a high incidence of human genetic deafness caused by functionally-null mutations in the GJB2 in many ethnic groups has been recognized for at least fifteen years [5-6, 18], no studies have yet investigated the effect of in vivo virally-mediated Cx26 expression [15]. One prominent disease phenotype in conditional Gjb2-null mutation mice is massive cell death in the middle and basal turns of sensory epithelium in the adult organ of Corti. Cells in the apical turn stay in the immature developmental state and the tunnel of Corti never opens in the adult stage [10]. Such a pathogenic process suggests that any gene therapy attempts to correct the Gjb2 defects at the adult stage is unlikely to succeed because native cochlear cells either degenerate or are unable to develop normally. In contrast, morphological development of the cochlea appears to be normal in cCx26KO mice before the tunnel of Corti starts to open around P9 [10], which suggests a potential window of opportunity for treatment before the cells die in the sensory epithelium. This motivated us to investigate the effects of virally-mediated exogenous Cx26 expression in early postnatal cochlea. Our results showed extensive expression of Cx26 and re-establishment of the GJ network in various types of cochlear cells lining the scale media. Ectopic cochlear Cx26 expression did not affect normal hearing in WT mice. We achieved both high transduction efficiency among various cochlear non-sensory cells and preservation of normal hearing sensitivity after direct inoculation of AAV into the scala media, thus solving two critical issues in treating Gjb2 related deafness by the gene therapy approach in mouse models. Functional tests revealed that such a gene therapy approach considerably corrected or improved many aspects of the disease phenotypes in the cochlea of cCx26KO mice, although the hearing sensitivity was not restored in these mutant mice.

Results

Viral inoculation into the scala media resulted in extensive exogenous Cx26 expression and formation of GJs

Cochlear GJs form an extensive intercellular network connecting all types of non-sensory cells in the sensory epithelium, lateral wall and spiral limbus [19-20]. In order to re-establish the cochlear GJs as extensively as possible in those cells in the cCx26KO mice, we inoculated viruses directly into the scala media since such an approach was able to achieve much better viral transduction in cochlear cells lining the scala media compared to other injection routes, such as injections made into the scala tympani through the round window (RW) (Fig. S1). The results are consistent with published studies by others [12-13, 15-16, 21]. By injecting viral vectors into early postnatal (P0-P1) scala media, we avoided causing any hair cell loss at the site of injection or at any other cochlear sites [16]. More importantly, ABR tests made one month later showed that hearing thresholds from 4k to 32 kHz were not affected in WT mice (filled reverse triangle, Fig. 7). We used contralateral un-injected cochlea from the same mice as controls (Figs. 2-6). No fluorescent GFP signal was ever observed from the control cochleae or in the spiral ganglion neurons, which suggested that the viral vectors only inoculated cells locally in the enclosed endolymphatic space. Fig. 1 compares Cx26 expression in a WT cochlea (Fig. 1A, obtained by immunolabeling of Cx26) and in the cochlea of cCx26KO mice (Fig. 1B). We distinguished the exogenous Cx26 from endogenous Cx26 by immunolabeling the tagged fusion GFP, since conditional Gjb2 gene deletions may not be 100% complete in the cochlea of cCx26KO mice [10]. Observing from the surface view of a large region of cochlear cells, as made possible on a flattened cochlear preparation [22], we found virally-mediated Cx26 expression in many types of cochlear cells (Fig. 1B & Fig. 2, G-I). The viral transduction efficiency tends to be highest in the basal turn, which may be explained by a viral titer gradient created here, as we always injected a small volume (0.2-0.5 μl) into the basal turn. The details about the transduction efficiencies in various types of cochlear cells at different cochlear turns are given in Table1. Outer sulcus cells had the highest transfection rate of all types of cochlear cells which was nearly 100% at all the cochlear turn, followed by the spindle-shaped cells in the stria vascularis. Ectopic expression in the marginal and spindle-shaped cells was significant, which ranged from 20-60%. The lowest transfection rate (11-13%) was found in the hair cells and outer sulcus cells at the apical turn.
Figure 7

Tone-burst ABR test results of four groups of mice across a frequency range of 4k to 32 kHz. Hearing thresholds of WT and cCx26KO mice, either treated or untreated with virally-expressed Cx26 are given as labeled in the figure. The relatively high hearing thresholds at higher frequencies (e.g., 24-32 kHz) were caused by the acoustic property of the speaker and the tube connecting the speaker to the ear we used in experiments.

Figure 2

Detailed comparison of endogenous and virally-mediated exogenous Cx26 expression in cochlear cells

A-C): Confocal images showing the immunolabeling patterns of Cx26 (in green) taken from a flattened cochlear preparation of WT mouse in the Claudius cells (cell membrane outlined by the hexagonal red phalloidin counterstaing) and Hensen's cells (an example is indicated by an arrow) (A), outer sulcus cell (B) and marginal cells (C).

D-F) Confocal images showing the immunolabeling patterns of Cx26 (in green) taken from a flattened cochlear preparation of untreated cCx26KO mouse in the cochlear regions of Claudius cells (D), outer sulcus cell (E) and marginal cells (F).

G-I) Confocal images showing the immunolabeling results (in green) with an antibody against the GFP, demonstrating the distribution patterns of Cx26-GFP fusion protein in the cochlea of treated cCx26KO mouse in the cochlear regions of Claudius cells (D), outer sulcus cell (E) and marginal cells (F). The red counter-labeling was obtained with phalloidin conjugated to Alexa568. Scale bars in all panels represent approximately 50 μm.

Figure 1

Comparison of endogenous and virally-mediated exogenous Cx26 expression in the cochlea

A) A confocal image showing the immunolabeling pattern of Cx26 (in green) taken from a flattened cochlear preparation of WT mouse. Major cochlear cell type regions are labeled on the right side of the figure. B) A confocal image showing the immunolabeling pattern of GFP (in green) taken from a flattened cochlear preparation of cCx26KO mouse received virus injection. The GFP is fused to the Cx26 in the design of the viral vector in order to differentiate exogenous Cx26 from residual endogenous Cx26 protein in the cCx26KO mice. The red counter-labeling was obtained with phalloidin conjugated to Alexa568. Scale bars in both panels represent approximately 20 μm.

Table 1

Transduction efficiency (% of cells transfected, n>100 in all cases) in various types of cochlear cells at different cochlear turns.

Hair CellsHensen's cellsClaudius CellsOuter Sulcus CellsSpindle –Shaped cellMarginal Cells
Basal turn44±313±247±899±0.561±745±4
Middle turn32±410±328±798±141±532±7
Apical turn13±27±211±398±132±521±3
Virally-mediated Cx26 expression was found in cells where Cx26 is normally expressed, and ectopically in the hair cells, spindle-shaped cells and marginal cells in the stria vascularis (compare Fig. 1, A&B). Enlarged views are presented in Fig. 2 for detailed comparisons. Cochlear GJs were re-established extensively in almost all Claudius cells (compare Fig. 2, A, D&G) and outer sulcus cells (compare Fig. 2, B, E&H) in the cochlea of cCx26KO mice after injection with the viral construct (Fig. 2, G&H). Nearly all outer sulcus cells appeared to be connected by re-established GJs. In the Claudius cells, however, it seemed that GJs in the cell membrane tended to form in cells whose neighboring cells were all transfected and expressed Cx26. One example is indicated by an arrowhead in Fig. 2G. When Cx26 expression in some of the surrounding cells were below the detection level or some of the surrounding cells were not transfected, we found that the Cx26 protein in those cells tended to stay in the intracellular space and few GJ-plaque-like immunostaining was seen in the membrane of outer sulcus cells. Examples are pointed out by small arrows in Fig. 2G. The non-disrupted immunolabeling pattern in the membrane of Claudius cells, which correlate with the size of GJ plaques [23], appeared to be smaller in virally-expressed cochleae as well (compare Fig. 2, A&G, B&H). We estimated that the re-established GJ plaques were 53±11% (N=62) and 36±8.3% (N=78) the size of WT plaques in Claudius cells and outer sulcus cells, respectively. In addition, we observed that at least one important type of supporting cells, the Hensen's cells, expressed Cx26 poorly in our studies (compare Fig. 2, A&G). In addition to re-established GJs in the cell membrane, strong intracellular Cx26-GFP signal was observed in a large number of marginal cells (ranging from 45-21% in different turns, Table1), spindle-shaped cells (61-32%, Table 1) and hair cells (44-13%, Table1) where Cx26 is not normally expressed in WT cochlea (comparing Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, C, F&I). We never observed aggregation of GFP signal in the cell membrane and formation of GJ-like plaques in the membrane of these cells (Fig. 1B & Fig. 2I). Differential trafficking and targeting pattern of Cx26 in various epithelial cell types suggest that targeting and clustering of Cx26 might depend on other factors that are specifically expressed in only a subset of epithelial cells in the cochlear supporting cells. Such regulatory mechanisms should play a critical role in cochlear functions as the ectopic Cx26 expression didn't result in the formation of GJs in these cochlear cells, and normal hearing thresholds in WT mice was not affected (Fig. 7, curve with reverse triangle data points).

Re-established cochlear GJs partially restored intercellular coupling in the cochlea of cCx26 KO mice

We used two independent methods to test whether the re-established GJs recovered intercellular coupling in the cochlea of cCx26KO mice. GJ-mediated intercellular coupling among the supporting cells was first tested by dye diffusion assay, in which a charged fluorescent dye (propidium iodide, PI) was injected intracellularly into the outer sulcus cells and its diffusion over a period of time across GJs to neighboring cells was observed. Fig. 3 compares the time course of dye diffusion in the outer sulcus cells of WT mice (Fig. 3A, image panels presented in the bottom row), virus-injected cCx26KO mice (Fig. 3A, image panels given in the middle row) and cCx26KO mice without injections (Fig. 3A, image panels in the top row). In Fig. 3B, exogenous GJ plaques in the cell membrane providing intercellular coupling were visualized by the green GFP among these cells. Comparison of the dye diffusion results showed partial but considerable functional recovery in the cochlea of mice that received virus injections. The quantification results (Fig. 3C) showed that a significant amount of intercellular coupling, as measured by the number of cells which received GJ-mediated dye diffusion from the injected cell over time, was significantly restored among the cells which received virus injections, although there was still a substantial difference comparing to the WT cells. Another independent method we used to evaluate the amount of intercellular GJ-mediated coupling was the fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching (FRAP) assay. Photobleached cells are indicated by small arrows in Fig. 4A. A series of images taken around the time when the cells were photobleached are given in the top, middle and bottom rows for WT, virus injected mutant mice and cCx26KO mice without injection, respectively (Fig. 4A). We measured the intensity of fluorescence recovery over time for the cell indicated by arrows (Fig. 4A). The recovery results from photobleaching were normalized as the percentage of baseline fluorescence before photobleaching was given (Fig. 4B, n=10). The results showed that the average time to reach the half intensity of steady-state recovery was 0.47±0.03, and 2.3±0.4 for WT and virus inoculated outer sulcus cells, respectively. The same cells in the cCx26KO showed no recovery at all.
Figure 3

Result of dye diffusion assay used to evaluate the intercellular coupling among the cochlear outer sulcus cells of WT, treated and untreated cCx26KO mice

A) Time series images showing the diffusion of a charged fluorescent dye across GJs from one injected cells to neighboring cells. Results obtained from WT, treated and untreated cCx26KO mouse cochlea are given in the bottom row, middle row and top row, respectively.

B) GFP signal (green) overlapped with the dye (red) diffusion pattern, demonstrating that the cells are coupled by GJs. C) Quantification of the number of cells received the dye diffusion among the outer sulcus cells over time in WT, treated and untreated cCx26KO mouse cochlea, as labeled in the figure.

Figure 4

Results of FRAP assay for evaluating the intercellular coupling among the cochlear cells of WT, treated and untreated cCx26KO mice

A) Time series images showing the fluorescence recovery in the photo-bleached cells (indicated by white arrows) of WT (top row), treated (middle row) and untreated (bottom row) cCx26KO mouse cochlea. Time interval of each panel is one minute. The first panel shows the outer sulcus cells loaded with calcein AM just before photobleaching. The cell pointed by the white arrow was photobleached by intense laser light for 10 seconds, after which the fluorescence recovery in the cell is measured. B) Quantification of the FRAP results showing the relative fluorescence intensity change around the time when the cell is photobleached.

Functional improvement in the injected cochleae of cCx26Ko mice was supported by the observation that there was a considerable lessening of morphological abnormality and a notable prevention of SG neuron degeneration in the cochlea of the mutant mice that received virus injections. Fig. 5 compares the morphology of the organ of Corti in WT mice (Fig. 5A, image panels a-c in the left column), cCx26KO mice with virus injection (Fig. 5A, image panels g-i in the right column) and cCx26KO mice without virus injection (Fig. 5A, image panels d-f in the middle column). Cell death in the middle and basal turns was substantially reduced (compare Fig. 5A, panels e&h). The tunnel of Corti (indicated by arrows in Fig. 5A, h&i) was partially opened in the treated cochleae in the middle (compare Fig. 5A, panels e&h) and basal (compare Fig. 5A, panels f&i) turns, although the opening was not as wide as the WT organ of Corti (panels a-c), and the tunnel of Corti remained closed in the apical turn (indicated by an arrow in the Fig. 5g). In our published papers we have described that the cellular degeneration started in the middle turn, then spread to the basal turn in the cochlea of cCx26 KO mice with a variable time course [10, 21], resulting in variation of cell death in the basal turn among individual animals. With the inoculation of virus, we generally observed that death of hair cells was significantly reduced in the middle and basal turns. The hair cells in the organ of Corti were counted in the whole-mount cochlear preparation (Fig. 5B). Although the difference among apical hair cells were small between the treated (51.8±2 per 100 μm linear length) and untreated sides (53.1±1 per 100 μm linear length), the effect was more significant in the middle and basal turns. There was a substantial difference in the survival of hair cells between the treat (40.0±4.4 per 100 μm linear length) and untreated (1.9±0.4 per 100 μm linear length) cochleae in the middle turn (Fig. 5B, comparing two panels in the middle column). In the basal turn the survived hair cells increased from 25.0±4.3 per 100 μm linear length in the untreated side to 43.8±4.1 per 100 μm linear length as a result of viral-mediated Cx26 expression (Fig. 5B, comparing two panels in the right column).
Figure 5

Morphological disease phenotypes in the organ of Corti of cCx26KO mouse cochlea were improved

A) Images comparing the morphology of the organ of Corti in the WT (a-c), untreated (d-f) and treated (g-i) mice. Results obtained from the apical, middle and basal turns are given in the top, middle and bottom rows, respectively. B) Comparison of the hair cell (labeled green with an antibody against Myo6) survival in the cochlea of treated (bottom row) and untreated (top row) mice. Cochlear turns are labeled in the figure. The red counter-labeling was obtained with phalloidin conjugated to Alexa568. Scale bars in all panels represent approximately 50 μm.

No transfection of SG neurons was observed after viral inoculation. Better cell survival in the organ of Corti, however, apparently prevented secondary death of SG neurons. Fig. 6A compares SG neuron degeneration in the apical, middle and basal turns of the treated and untreated cochlea. Quantification (given in Fig. 6B, with SG neuron density normalized to the results obtained from WT cochlea) of the survival of SG neurons showed that virally-mediated Cx26 expression substantially increased SG neuron survival in the middle and basal turns. The apical SG neurons in cCx26KO mice were relatively intact [21], therefore the effect of viral treatment on promoting survival of these neurons was not significant. It is interesting to note that in WT mice the density of SG neurons in middle turn was higher than that in the basal turn (Fig. 6B), which is consistent with our published results [21]. Fig. 7 shows the results of frequency-specific ABR tests measured by tone-burst, in which the hearing thresholds of four groups of mice were tested. Similar thresholds were obtained in WT mice (n=8, data shown with hollow reverse triangles) and WT mice which received virus injections (n=8, data shown with filled reverse triangles), indicating that our surgical procedures and the virally-mediated Cx26 expression did not damage hearing. The hearing of cCx26KO mice, in the ears which received viral injection (n=8, data points with hollow circles) and the untreated contralateral side (n=8, data points with filled circles), both showed substantial threshold elevations compared to WT mice. The thresholds of the treated and untreated ears showed no statistical differences at frequencies ranging from 4 kHz to 32 kHz. Our conclusion is that partial morphology recovery in treated cCx26KO mice apparently was not enough to bring back hearing sensitivity.
Figure 6

Secondary death of SG neuron after degeneration of the organ of Corti was significantly reduced in the treated cochlea of the middle and basal turns

A) DIC images showing the SG neurons in cochlear sections of untreated (top row) and treated (bottom row) mice. B) Normalized SG neuron densities in the three cochlear turns are compared for the treated and untreated cochlea as labeled. Statistically significant differences between the two groups are denoted by symbols about the bars.

Discussion

One of the major difficulties in successfully treating disease phenotypes caused by GJB2 null mutations with a gene therapy approach is the apparent requirement of wide-spectrum expression of exogenous GJB2 in all types of non-sensory cells, since it is known that cochlear gap junctions connect all cells except the hair cells in the cochlea of WT mice [21, 24] . We have employed a number of novel approaches in this study in order for virally-mediated Cx26 expression to be as extensive as possible in the cochlear cells. Our first series of experiments found that injections made into the scala tympani through the round window resulted in little Cx26 expression in cells lining the scala media (Fig. S1). This result was consistent with most previous reports [12-13, 15-16]. We therefore performed a localized virus-mediated gene transfer directly into the small volume of the scala media of early postnatal (P0-P1) mice, as our published results showed that this approach is likely the most appropriate for preserving the hearing sensitivity [16]. Such a treatment also maximizes the efficiency for virus to access all types of cochlear cells lining the scala media and minimizes possible side effects of gene therapy by reducing the chance of general adverse general immuno-effects or other genetic complications. Large numbers of gene therapy studies aiming for hearing rescue have been conducted in the cochlea [12-16]. The focus of past studies, however, has mostly been on regenerating sensory cells from survived supporting cells or by using a cell replacement approach to restore normal inner ear functions [15]. Transforming survived cells into hair cells is unlikely to successfully treat deaf patients suffering from genetic mutations because the causative mutation still remains in the genome. The new hair cells, even if successfully regenerated, will still suffer consequences of the original genetic mutation. An effective approach is gene-based therapy for treating genetic deafness which consists of introducing exogenous expression of normal copies of the mutated gene in affected cells. Most studies [14, 25-27] have shown that injections made directly into the scala media in adult animals produce side-effects such as the breaking of cochlear structure, mixing of the perilymph and endolymph, all of which invariably lead to severe hearing loss [14, 28-29]. In this study we demonstrated that transgene expression with our approach of injecting into the cochlea of early postnatal mice was localized within the scala media, with minimal leak to the scala tympani, and no spread to surrounding tissue and contralateral cochlea. Our follow-up studies showed functional recovery of the cochlear GJ network (Figs. 3&4) as well as important phenotypic improvement of the injected cochlea, as compared to the contralateral non-injected cochlea (Figs. 5&6). In addition to these novel findings, we demonstrated for the first time that extensive ectopic Cx26 expression in cochlear cells of WT mice did not affect normal hearing (Fig. 7). Interestingly, our previous study also showed that high levels of GFP expression in a large number of cochlear cells did not harm hearing sensitivity [16]. These results validated our surgical procedures and demonstrated that excess virally-expressed exogenous protein is not necessarily harmful to cochlear function. These results are encouraging for future gene therapy for the treatment of GJB2 mutations since ectopic gene expression is usually unavoidable after viral vectors are inoculated into tissue. Many viral vectors have been tested for in vivo expression of exogenous genes in the cochlea, including adenovirus [12], Adeno-associated virus (AAV) [30], lentivirus [27, 31], herpes simplex type I virus, vaccinia virus [13], and bovine Adeno-associated virus [14]. Our previous observations suggested that AAV2/1 injected before postnatal day 5 yielded the best results in terms of achieving the most widespread exogenous expression of GFP in the inner ear of mice. Another potential advantage of AAV-mediated transgene transfer is that its expression has been shown to last for several months [32]. When compared to results reported by a recently-published paper [33] in which congenital deaf mice lacking the vesicular glutamate transporter-3 (VGLUT3) were successfully treated, we noticed a few important similarities as well as differences. First, we observed that the exogenous Cx26 protein was expressed in both the targeted cells and ectopically in many other types of cochlear cells, whereas virally-expressed VGLUT3 protein was only detected in the intended targeted cells (the inner hair cells). Despite ectopic Cx26 expression, cell autonomous regulatory mechanisms governing protein trafficking and assembly of GJ plaques apparently restricted the formation of functional GJs only among those cells that are normally coupled by GJs in WT mice. It seemed that both virally-expressed GJB2 and VGLUT3 were only functionally manifested in their intended targets. Secondly, we were able to achieve a nearly 100% Cx26 expression in the outer sulcus cells. However, the transduction efficiency for other types of cochlear cells was not as complete, especially in the Hensen's cells (Table 1). In comparison, the VGLUT3 is expressed in 100% of inner hair cells [33] even when viruses were injected to the scala tympani, from which hair cells are separated by the tightly sealed basilar membrane. The reason for these disparities is not clear and certainly warrant future studies, although one might speculate that the difference may be due to the unique post-transcriptional regulation of the VGLUT3 gene or virus titer differences. Our initial motivation for this study was to answer the following questions: (1) What is the extent and specificity of virally-mediated Gjb2 expression in the cells lining the scala media if we directly inoculate viral vectors into the endolymphatic space? Will the surgical procedure for viral inoculation itself damage hearing sensitivity? (2) Will the exogenous Cx26 protein be properly transported to the cell membrane and form functional GJs? What are the functional consequences of ectopically expressed Cx26 in the cochlea? (3) What disease phenotypes caused by Gjb2 null mutation in the mouse model can be corrected by our gene therapy treatment? Our results provided answers to most of these questions. We showed for the first time that restoration of the extensive gap junction intercellular network among cochlear non-sensory cells in vivo is possible by a virally-mediated gene therapy approach in cCx26KO mice. Partial morphological rescue of the cells in the organ of Corti, especially in the middle and basal turns, and the prevention of degeneration of the SG neurons provided evidence of important treatment effect of gene therapy. The reason for little improvement in hearing thresholds of cCx26KO mice is currently unknown and can only be speculated upon here for future studies. We injected viral vectors at P0-P1 into the scala media, but AAV-mediated exogenous gene expression takes about one week to reach the maximal stable level [16]. It is possible that we missed the critical window for rescue when Cx26 is uniquely required for the development of the organ of Corti [34]. The percentage of non-sensory cochlear cells transduced by viral vectors certainly needs to be improved, especially in the Hensen's cells (Table 1) in order to form a complete loop of intercellular GJ network in the cochlea. In order to achieve this goal, we may need to inject viral vectors at earlier stages, possibly into the otocyst of embryonic mice since it has been reported that a high transduction rate was obtained after in utero delivery to the developing mouse otocyst [35-36]. Recent successful hearing restoration in connexin30 knockout mice achieved by gene therapy treatment delivered at embryonic stage is encouraging [37]. Alternatively we may need to mix multiple types of virus for the viral delivery in order to improve transduction efficiency since different serotypes of virus may target different types of cochlear cells with different optimal efficiencies [15]. In summary, our work represents the first step in investigations on treatment for the most common form of inherited deafness, which is caused by GJB2 null mutations. We have identified a viral vector (AAV2/1) that targets many types of cochlear cells lining the scala media. Although the transfection rate in many types of cochlear cells and cochlear regions was more than 50%, it is unclear whether or not this percentage of expression is sufficient to restore functional recovery of the cell-cell gap junction network. Nevertheless, our results support the principle of using a virally-mediated gene therapy approach to restore the extensive gap junction intercellular network. By preserving hearing sensitivity and achieving high efficiency exogenous expression of GJB2 in the inner ear, we have accomplished an important and necessary step in the treatment of congenital deafness cases which require early intervention in order to restore hearing sensitivity. Future investigations are still needed to improve the transduction efficacy of various types of cochlear non-sensory cells, to investigate long-term safety, and to study ethical implications before a gene therapy approach for human congenital deafness disease can become a reality.

Materials and methods

Animal use and surgical procedures for injecting virus into the scala media

Conditional Cx26 knockout mice (Foxg1-cCx26KO) and their littermate wide type (WT) controls were used in this study. Details about the generation and genotyping of Foxg1-cCx26KO mice were given previously described [10, 21]. Genetic background of mice was C57BL. Animal use protocols were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of Emory University. Extensive viral transduction in the cochlea is required for the success of this project because Cx26 is normally expressed by all types of cochlear non-sensory cells [19]. However, current surgical procedures used in cochlear gene therapy for microinjections into the scala media usually are performed with adult animals. The procedure severely damage hearing sensitivity [12-14], thus defeating the purpose of treatment. We recently developed a new injection approach which used early postnatal mice. Such a new procedure avoided damaging mouse hearing sensitivity when mice grow to adulthood [16]. With our new method, hearing threshold is preserved if injections into the scala media are done to mice younger than P5. In this study we used P0 (the day mice were born) or P1-old mice for virus injections in order to avoid adversely affect the hearing sensitivity. The results confirmed that injections made into the scala media achieved much better viral transduction in cochlear cells lining the scala media than with injections made into the scala tympani through the round window (RW) (Fig. S1). This finding was also consistent with results obtained by most previous reports [12-13, 15]. Injections of 0.2-0.5 μl of virus-containing phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) were carried out with a Picospritzer III pressure microinjection system (Picospritzer III, Parker Hannifin Corp, NY). Direct monitoring of fluid ejection was made possible by including a fast green dye (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St Louis) in the solution, which made the movement of fluid ejection out of the pipette visible when observed with a dissection microscope (Zeiss Stemi 2000, Zeiss, Germany) under bright light illumination. For each animal only one side of the cochlea was injected near the basal turn, and the contralateral cochlea was used as a control. Most animals (>90%) survived surgeries and we found no signs of inflammation in the middle and inner ears. Both dye diffusion and FRAP assays were used in functional studies (Figs. 3&4) performed with the flattened cochlear preparation made from P8-P10 mice. Cochlear morphology (Fig. 5) was examined using cochlear specimens obtained from P30-60 mice. We used one-month old mice in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) tests (Fig. 7).

Preparation of viral vectors

Our previous studies suggested that the Adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 2/1 gives the best transduction for GFP reporter gene expression in cochlear non-sensory cells, and virally-mediated gene expression driven by the CB7 promoter was more stable and widespread in the cochlea compared to that driven by the CMV promoter [16]. We therefore used either AAV-CB7-Gjb2 (AAV modified to express Gjb2 driven by the CB7 promoter, titer: 1.5×1013 genome copies per ml (GC/ml)) or AAV-CB7-Gjb2-GFP (AAV modified to express Gjb2-GFP fusion protein driven by the CB7 promoter, titer: 1.2×1012 GC/ml,) in this study. The transgene cassettes in the viral constructs consisted of either CMV or CB7 promoter for driving the expression of Gjb2 or Gjb2 fused with the GFP. Details of AAV constructs are described in Fig. S2. Viral vectors were prepared by the HOT strategy, which is helper virus free and uses only two plasmids in the transfection step [38]. AAV was generated at the Emory virus core facility and details of the virus production were given in our published paper [16]. The AAV vectors were purified using the iodixanol gradient centrifugation procedure [39]. Virus titers were measured by real-time PCR [40]. The virus aliquots (10 μl each) were kept at −80°C and one aliquot in PBS was thawed prior to the injection.

Histological processing procedures and data analysis

Both injected and un-injected cochleae were processed and compared in order to evaluate the effects of virally-mediated expression of Cx26. Details of the immunolabeling protocols performed with flattened cochlear preparations were given previously [22, 41]. Primary polyclonal antibodies against Cx26 (dilution 1:200, catalog# 71-0500, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), GFP (1:200, cat#A11122, lot#1024102, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), or Myo6 (catalog#25-6791, lot#100201, 1:200, Proteus BioSciences, CA) were incubated with the specimen overnight at 4°C. The immunolabeling of the primary antibodies was visualized using a goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (1:500 dilution, cat# A11008, lot#1166843, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) or a goat anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 568 (1:500, cat#A11061, lot#1180091, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Counterstaining was used to better visualize cell membranes and hair bundles using phalloidin conjugated to Alexa568 (catalog#P-1951, lot#093K0474, dilution 1:1000, Sigma, MO). All samples were mounted in fluoromount-G antifading solution (catalog#17984-25, Electron Microscopy Science, PA) and images were acquired with a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM, Carl Zeiss, Germany). Epoxy resin cochlear sections were made according to our previously-published protocol [21]. Briefly, mouse tissues were fixed by transcardiac perfusion of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) dissolved in PBS. Cochleae were dissected out and subsequently perfused via the oval window with a solution of 2% PFA and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS, and kept in it overnight at 4°C. Decalcification was carried out for 72 hours at 4°C in 0.35M EDTA in PBS (pH 7.4). The cochlear samples were then immersed in 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 hours, followed by gradual dehydration in alcohol of increasing grades, then infiltrated and embedded in epoxy resin. Epoxy resin was purchased from Ted Pella Inc. (catalog#18060, Redding, California). Consecutive cochlear resin sections (5 μm in thickness) were cut along the modiolar axis using a microtome (Microm, model HM 335E, Germany). Cochlear sections were stained with toluidine blue and examined with a light microscope. The transduction efficiency of virally-mediated gene expression was measured by counting the number of cells that expressed the GFP signal. SG neuron density was calculated as described in our previously published paper [21] to compare the number of SG neurons in a given volume of tissue in the Rosenthal's canal of P30-P60 old mice. The resin sections were cut in 5 μm thicknesses and every other section was used to avoid double counting the neurons. To determine the SGN densities we manually counted the number of survived SG neurons in the cochlear turn using Image J software, and then divided the number of SGNs by the cross-sectional area of Rosenthal's canal to obtain density measures. All quantitative analyses were performed in a blind fashion by two independent investigators to ensure a consistency of counting. GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA) and Origin 7.0 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA) software were used in data analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student t-tests. Data were presented as mean±standard error of the mean (SEM). The level of significance was set at p<0.05.

Functional assays for evaluating GJ functions and ABR tests

To perform the dye diffusion assay, flattened cochlear preparations were placed in a recording chamber mounted on an upright microscope (Axioskop2 FX plus, Carl Zeiss, Germany). The use of DIC optics enabled us to directly recognize different cochlear cell types. Propidium iodide (PI, a positively-charged fluorescent dye) was injected into the cytoplasm of a single cell by forming the whole-cell patch-clamp recording mode. Borosilicate glass capillary pipettes (Sutter Instrument Co., Novato, CA) were pulled on a micropipette Puller (P-2000, Sutter Instrument Inc.) and the electrodes were fire-polished (MF-830, Narishige, Japan) before usage. HEPES buffered HBSS solution (H4891, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as the external bathing solution, which contained (in mM): NaCl 137, Na2HPO4 0.2, KCl 5.4, KH2PO4 0.4, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 1.2, and HEPES 10. Extracellular solution was perfused at a rate of ∼1 drop/second. The pipeline currents were amplified with an Axonpatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments, CA) and digitized with a Digidata 1322A interface (Axon Instrument, CA) in order to monitor and verify the formation of the whole-cell recording mode. Pipettes had an access resistance of about 3 MΩ when filled with an internal solution containing (in mM): 120 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 EGTA, pH adjusted to 7.2 with KOH. Fluorescent dye (0.75 mM PI, MW=668 Da, charge=+2, catalog# P1304MP, purchased from Invitrogen Inc.) was supplemented in the pipette solution. Images of intercellular dye diffusion at various time points were recorded by a cooled-CCD camera (AxioCam, Carl Zeiss, Germany). The same exposure time was used for samples obtained from WT and mutant mice at all data acquisition time points. Dye recipient cells were visually identified and counted using the same criteria as that used for images of WT and cCx26KO mice. All experiments were carried out at room temperature (20–25°C). FRAP assay was performed at the Integrated Cellular Imaging Core of the Emory University. We used calcein AM, which is a non-fluorescent and cell permeant compound until it is hydrolyzed by intracellular esterases into the fluorescent anion calcein, after which the only pathway for intercellular dye diffusion is through the GJ network. Flattened cochlear preparations were incubated with 10 μM calcein AM (MW= 994.87, catalog#C1430, lot#924140, Invitrogen Inc.) for 30 minutes in HBSS. The specimens were then transferred to the stage of the Nikon A1R point scanning confocal microscope. Cells were viewed with a 63× oil immersion objective. We delineated a target cell as the region of interest (ROI) to bleach, and also chose proximal unbleached cells as a reference in measurements. Baseline calcein fluorescence was recorded for 1 minute, followed by focal laser exposure (10 seconds) to bleach the intracellular calcein in the ROI. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching was monitored for up to 10 minutes. The same bleach intensity and acquisition time was used for samples obtained from WT, cCx26KO and virus injected mice. Image sequences were acquired using software developed by the Emory Integrated Cellular Imaging Core. Data were stored on disk and processed offline using the NIS-Elements Viewer (Nikon Instruments Inc., NY, USA) and Origin7.0 software (OriginLab, USA). ABR is an objective measurement of the hearing threshold based on sound-evoked potentials [42]. We measured hearing by ABR tests one month after the virus injections were done. Tone burst sound stimuli were presented with a sound tube attached to a high-frequency speaker (Tucker Davis Technologies, Alachua, FL) to one side of the ear. Sound frequencies were adjusted to 4, 8, 12, 18, 24 and 32 kHz in order to test frequency-specific hearing thresholds. Details of the ABR testing methods are given in our published papers [41]. We also monitored the circling behavior, head tilt and swimming ability of the injected mice, three parameters which reflect vestibular function. No signs of vestibular dysfunction resulting from the surgical procedures and virally-mediated gene expression were found. Figure S1. Comparison of viral inoculation results in the cells lining the scala media (bottom row) and scala tympani (top row) after viral constructs designed to express the GFP was injected into the scala tympani through the round window route. The injection was made at P1 and the inoculation results were observed at P8. Diagrams given on the right side show views obtained from two sides of the flattened cochlear preparation. Scale bars represent approximately 50 μm in all panels. Figure S2. Diagrams showing the design of viral constructs we used in the study.
  42 in total

Review 1.  Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss.

Authors:  R A Sundstrom; L Van Laer; G Van Camp; R J Smith
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-09-24

2.  HOX-GFP and WOX-GFP lentivirus vectors for inner ear gene transfer.

Authors:  Laura Pietola; Antti A Aarnisalo; Joonas Joensuu; Riikka Pellinen; Jarmo Wahlfors; Jussi Jero
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Universal real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of adeno-associated virus serotype 2-derived inverted terminal repeat sequences.

Authors:  Christine Aurnhammer; Maren Haase; Nadine Muether; Martin Hausl; Christina Rauschhuber; Ingrid Huber; Hans Nitschko; Ulrich Busch; Andreas Sing; Anja Ehrhardt; Armin Baiker
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther Methods       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.396

4.  Clinical features of the prevalent form of childhood deafness, DFNB1, due to a connexin-26 gene defect: implications for genetic counselling.

Authors:  F Denoyelle; S Marlin; D Weil; L Moatti; P Chauvin; E N Garabédian; C Petit
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  In vivo delivery of recombinant viruses to the fetal murine cochlea: transduction characteristics and long-term effects on auditory function.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bedrosian; Michael Anne Gratton; John V Brigande; Waixing Tang; Jessica Landau; Jean Bennett
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 11.454

6.  Prelingual deafness: high prevalence of a 30delG mutation in the connexin 26 gene.

Authors:  F Denoyelle; D Weil; M A Maw; S A Wilcox; N J Lench; D R Allen-Powell; A H Osborn; H H Dahl; A Middleton; M J Houseman; C Dodé; S Marlin; A Boulila-ElGaïed; M Grati; H Ayadi; S BenArab; P Bitoun; G Lina-Granade; J Godet; M Mustapha; J Loiselet; E El-Zir; A Aubois; A Joannard; J Levilliers; E N Garabédian; R F Mueller; R J Gardner; C Petit
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Noninvasive in vivo delivery of transgene via adeno-associated virus into supporting cells of the neonatal mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Takashi Iizuka; Sho Kanzaki; Hideki Mochizuki; Ayako Inoshita; Yuya Narui; Masayuki Furukawa; Takeshi Kusunoki; Makoto Saji; Kaoru Ogawa; Katsuhisa Ikeda
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.695

8.  Adenoviral-mediated gene transfer into guinea pig cochlear cells in vivo.

Authors:  Y Raphael; J C Frisancho; B J Roessler
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1996-03-29       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Gene transfer using bovine adeno-associated virus in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  S B Shibata; G Di Pasquale; S R Cortez; J A Chiorini; Y Raphael
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 5.250

10.  Gap junction mediated intercellular metabolite transfer in the cochlea is compromised in connexin30 null mice.

Authors:  Qing Chang; Wenxue Tang; Shoeb Ahmad; Binfei Zhou; Xi Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  49 in total

1.  Rescue of Hearing by Gene Delivery to Inner-Ear Hair Cells Using Exosome-Associated AAV.

Authors:  Bence György; Cyrille Sage; Artur A Indzhykulian; Deborah I Scheffer; Alain R Brisson; Sisareuth Tan; Xudong Wu; Adrienn Volak; Dakai Mu; Panos I Tamvakologos; Yaqiao Li; Zachary Fitzpatrick; Maria Ericsson; Xandra O Breakefield; David P Corey; Casey A Maguire
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 2.  Inner ear manifestations in CHARGE: Abnormalities, treatments, animal models, and progress toward treatments in auditory and vestibular structures.

Authors:  Daniel I Choo; Kareem O Tawfik; Donna M Martin; Yehoash Raphael
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 3.  Importance of cochlear health for implant function.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Ning Zhou; Deborah J Colesa; Melissa M Watts; Stefan B Strahl; Soha N Garadat; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Cameron L Budenz; Yehoash Raphael; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Gene therapy for hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryotaro Omichi; Seiji B Shibata; Cynthia C Morton; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  It's All in the Delivery: Improving AAV Transfection Efficiency with Exosomes.

Authors:  Donna M Martin; Yehoash Raphael
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 6.  Outlook and future of inner ear therapy.

Authors:  Jenna Devare; Samuel Gubbels; Yehoash Raphael
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Potential treatments for genetic hearing loss in humans: current conundrums.

Authors:  R Minoda; T Miwa; M Ise; H Takeda
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 8.  Gene therapy development in hearing research in China.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Jiping Wang; Chunyan Li; Wenyue Xue; Yazhi Xing; Feng Liu
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 9.  Sound strategies for hearing restoration.

Authors:  Gwenaëlle S G Géléoc; Jeffrey R Holt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Identification of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors That Target Neonatal and Adult Mammalian Inner Ear Cell Subtypes.

Authors:  Yilai Shu; Yong Tao; Zhengmin Wang; Yong Tang; Huawei Li; Pu Dai; Guangping Gao; Zheng-Yi Chen
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.695

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.