Literature DB >> 24225255

A preference test for sweet taste that uses edible strips.

Gregory Smutzer1, Janki Y Patel2, Judith C Stull3, Ray A Abarintos2, Neiladri K Khan2, Kevin C Park4.   

Abstract

A novel delivery method is described for the rapid determination of taste preferences for sweet taste in humans. This forced-choice paired comparison approach incorporates the non-caloric sweetener sucralose into a set of one-inch square edible strips for the rapid determination of sweet taste preferences. When compared to aqueous sucrose solutions, significantly lower amounts of sucralose were required to identify the preference for sweet taste. The validity of this approach was determined by comparing sweet taste preferences obtained with five different sucralose-containing edible strips to a set of five intensity-matched sucrose solutions. When compared to the solution test, edible strips required approximately the same number of steps to identify the preferred amount of sweet taste stimulus. Both approaches yielded similar distribution patterns for the preferred amount of sweet taste stimulus. In addition, taste intensity values for the preferred amount of sucralose in strips were similar to that of sucrose in solution. The hedonic values for the preferred amount of sucralose were lower than for sucrose, but the taste quality of the preferred sucralose strip was described as sweet. When taste intensity values between sucralose strips and sucralose solutions containing identical amounts of taste stimulus were compared, sucralose strips produced a greater taste intensity and more positive hedonic response. A preference test that uses edible strips for stimulus delivery should be useful for identifying preferences for sweet taste in young children, and in clinical populations. This test should also be useful for identifying sweet taste preferences outside of the lab or clinic. Finally, edible strips should be useful for developing preference tests for other primary taste stimuli and for taste mixtures.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Edible taste strip; Gustation; Sucralose; Sweet taste; Taste preference; Taste test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24225255      PMCID: PMC3956596          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  43 in total

1.  Taste responses in alcohol-dependent men.

Authors:  A Bogucka-Bonikowska; A Scinska; E Koros; E Polanowska; B Habrat; B Woronowicz; A Kukwa; W Kostowski; P Bienkowski
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.826

2.  Molecular mechanism of the sweet taste enhancers.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Boris Klebansky; Richard M Fine; Haitian Liu; Hong Xu; Guy Servant; Mark Zoller; Catherine Tachdjian; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Gustation assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Susan E Coldwell; Julie A Mennella; Valerie B Duffy; Marcia L Pelchat; James W Griffith; Gregory Smutzer; Beverly J Cowart; Paul A S Breslin; Linda M Bartoshuk; Lloyd Hastings; David Victorson; Howard J Hoffman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; B J Booth; M L Losee; S D Pecore; Z S Warwick
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 5.  Individual differences in sensory preferences for fat in model sweet dairy products.

Authors:  A Drewnowski
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1993-10

6.  Evaluation of the Monell forced-choice, paired-comparison tracking procedure for determining sweet taste preferences across the lifespan.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Laura D Lukasewycz; James W Griffith; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Artificial sweeteners produce the counterintuitive effect of inducing metabolic derangements.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 12.015

8.  Cream and sugar: human preferences for high-fat foods.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; M R Greenwood
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1983-04

9.  A test for measuring gustatory function.

Authors:  Gregory Smutzer; Si Lam; Lloyd Hastings; Hetvi Desai; Ray A Abarintos; Marc Sobel; Nabil Sayed
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Effects of diet soda on gut hormones in youths with diabetes.

Authors:  Rebecca J Brown; Mary Walter; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Schizophrenia and Depression Co-Morbidity: What We have Learned from Animal Models.

Authors:  James N Samsom; Albert H C Wong
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.157

2.  Toward Improving Medication Adherence: The Suppression of Bitter Taste in Edible Taste Films.

Authors:  Silvy Cherian; Brian Sang Lee; Robin M Tucker; Kevin Lee; Gregory Smutzer
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2018-06-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.