Daniel Lubelski1, Adeeb Derakhshan1, Amy S Nowacki2, Jeffrey C Wang3, Michael P Steinmetz4, Edward C Benzel1, Thomas E Mroz5. 1. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, 9500 Euclid Ave., NA-20, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., S-40, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., S-40, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. 2. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., NB-21, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Box 956901, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 4. Department of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 Metrohealth Dr, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA. 5. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, 9500 Euclid Ave., NA-20, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., S-40, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., S-40, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. Electronic address: mrozt@ccf.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: C5 nerve root palsy (C5P) is a relatively rare complication after anterior and posterior cervical decompression surgery that leads to a variety of debilitating symptoms. The precise etiology remains obscure, and a clear understanding of preoperative risk factors for C5P development does not exist. PURPOSE: To determine whether postoperative C5P can be predicted from preoperative anteroposterior diameter (APD), foraminal diameter (FD), and/or cord-lamina angle (CLA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive patients who underwent either anterior or posterior decompression surgery at C4-C5 for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of C5P. METHODS: Blinded reviewers retrospectively assessed magnetic resonance images for each included patient's C4-C5 interspace, including the midline APD, the left and right FDs, and the left and right CLA. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the probability of palsy on the basis of one or more predictors. A jackknife validation was performed to internally validate the model and assess its generalizability. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients fit the inclusion criteria; 12% had developed symptoms of C5 palsy postoperatively. Using the three variables in a predictor-model, we found that the odds ratio of having palsy for APD, FD, and CLA was 0.3, 0.02, and 1.4, respectively. For every 1-mm increase in APD and FD, the odds of developing palsy decrease 69% (p<.0001) and decrease 98% (p<.0003), respectively. In contrast, for every 1-degree increase in CLA, the odds of developing palsy increase by 43% (p<.0001). The receiver-operating characteristic curve for this three-variable model predicting development of palsy has an area under the curve (concordance index) of 0.97. After implementing a jackknife validation, the area under the curve was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to use the combination of APD, FD, and CLA to predict development of postoperative C5 palsy after decompression surgery for patients with spondylotic myelopathy. This prediction formula may allow for better patient selection and to prepare patients that have an increased probability of developing this complication.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: C5 nerve root palsy (C5P) is a relatively rare complication after anterior and posterior cervical decompression surgery that leads to a variety of debilitating symptoms. The precise etiology remains obscure, and a clear understanding of preoperative risk factors for C5P development does not exist. PURPOSE: To determine whether postoperative C5P can be predicted from preoperative anteroposterior diameter (APD), foraminal diameter (FD), and/or cord-lamina angle (CLA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive patients who underwent either anterior or posterior decompression surgery at C4-C5 for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of C5P. METHODS: Blinded reviewers retrospectively assessed magnetic resonance images for each included patient's C4-C5 interspace, including the midline APD, the left and right FDs, and the left and right CLA. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the probability of palsy on the basis of one or more predictors. A jackknife validation was performed to internally validate the model and assess its generalizability. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients fit the inclusion criteria; 12% had developed symptoms of C5 palsy postoperatively. Using the three variables in a predictor-model, we found that the odds ratio of having palsy for APD, FD, and CLA was 0.3, 0.02, and 1.4, respectively. For every 1-mm increase in APD and FD, the odds of developing palsy decrease 69% (p<.0001) and decrease 98% (p<.0003), respectively. In contrast, for every 1-degree increase in CLA, the odds of developing palsy increase by 43% (p<.0001). The receiver-operating characteristic curve for this three-variable model predicting development of palsy has an area under the curve (concordance index) of 0.97. After implementing a jackknife validation, the area under the curve was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to use the combination of APD, FD, and CLA to predict development of postoperative C5 palsy after decompression surgery for patients with spondylotic myelopathy. This prediction formula may allow for better patient selection and to prepare patients that have an increased probability of developing this complication.
Authors: Daniel J Blizzard; Michael A Gallizzi; Charles Sheets; Mitchell R Klement; Lindsay T Kleeman; Adam M Caputo; Megan Eure; Christopher R Brown Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 2.359