| Literature DB >> 24223505 |
Oleh Smutok1, Maria Karkovska, Halyna Smutok, Mykhailo Gonchar.
Abstract
L-lactate, a key metabolite of the anaerobic glycolytic pathway, plays an important role as a biomarker in medicine, in the nutritional sector and food quality control. For these reasons, there is a need for very specific, sensitive, and simple analytical methods for the accurate L-lactate measuring. A new highly selective enzymatic method for L-lactate determination based on the use of flavocytochrome b 2 (EC 1.1.2.3; FC b 2) isolated from the recombinant strain of the yeast Hansenula polymorpha has been developed. A proposed enzymatic method exploits an enzymatic oxidation of L-lactate to pyruvate coupled with nitrotetrazolium blue (NTZB) reduction to a colored product, formazan. The maximal absorption peak of the colored product is near λ = 525 nm and the linear range is observed in the interval 0.005-0.14 mM of L-lactate. The main advantages of the proposed method when compared to the LDH-based routine approaches are a higher sensitivity (2.0 μM of L-lactate), simple procedure of analysis, usage of inexpensive, nontoxic reagents, and small amount of the enzyme. Enzymatic oxidation of L-lactate catalyzed by flavocytochrome b 2 and coupled with formazan production from nitrotetrazolium blue was shown to be used for L-lactate assay in food samples. A high correlation between results of the proposed method and reference ones proves the possibility to use flavocytochrome b 2-catalysed reaction for enzymatic measurement of L-lactate in biotechnology and food chemistry.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24223505 PMCID: PMC3800577 DOI: 10.1155/2013/461284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1The scheme of the reactions exploited in enzymatic assay of L-lactate.
Figure 2Dependence of optical density of the reaction mixture on L-lactate concentration (a) and a linear range (b) for enzymatic method. Conditions are described in Section 2.
Bioanalytical characteristics of different methods of L-lactate assay (calculated for concentrations in the final reaction mixture).
| Enzymatic methods |
|
| Detection limit, | Linear range, mM | Time of analysis, min |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LDH-GPT based [ | 340 | 6.3 | 3.37 | 0.033–0.39 | 30 |
| Flavocytochrome | 680 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0.008–0.27 | 30 |
| LO: peroxidase; ABTS based [ | 405 | 34 | — | 0.002–0.068 | 30 |
| LDH based [ | 340 | 6.3 | 5.6 | 0.025–0.16 | 30 |
| Lactate oxidase and aminoantipyrine based [ | 546 | 38 | — | 0.0003–0.099 | 10 |
| Current method | 525 | 12 | 2.0 | 0.005–0.14 | 20 |
Figure 3Dependence of optical density of reaction mixture on NADH concentration.
Comparison of the results of L-lactate assay (in mM) in food products.
| Sample | Method | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| FC | NAD+-LDH-based method [ | Current method | |
|
| 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.278 ± 0.03 | 0.192 ± 0.002 |
|
| 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.179 ± 0.006 | 0.26 ± 0.33 | 0.172 ± 0.01 |
|
| 1.43 ± 0.35 | 1.36 ± 0.02 | 1.64 ± 0.11 | 1.46 ± 0.4 |
|
| 0.62 ± 0.129 | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 1.08 ± 0.04 | 0.74 ± 0.02 |
|
| 0.15 ± 0.014 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.256 ± 0.05 | 0.16 ± 0.015 |
|
| 0.14 ± 0.001 | 0.132 ± 0.01 | 0.285 ± 0.07 | 0.135 ± 0.01 |
*Difference between current method and the compared methods is statistically significant.
**Difference between current method and other methods is statistically insignificant.
Comparison of the results of L-lactate assay (in g·L−1) in wine samples.
| Sample | Method | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| FC | Declared by producer | Current method | |
|
| 2.4 ± 0.28 | 2.25 ± 0.18 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 2.15 ± 0.13 |
|
| 1.16 ± 0.11 | 1.03 ± 0.08 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 0.97 ± 0.12 |
|
| 0.58 ± 0.05 | 0.6 ± 0.07 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.49 ± 0.08 |
*Difference between current method and the compared methods is statistically significant.
**Difference between current method and other methods is statistically insignificant.