| Literature DB >> 24223280 |
Federica Ragazzola1, Laura C Foster, Armin U Form, Janina Büscher, Thor H Hansteen, Jan Fietzke.
Abstract
It is important to understand how marine calcifying organisms may acclimatize to ocean acidification to assess their survival over the coming century. We cultured the cold water coralline algae, Lithothamnion glaciale, under elevated pCO2 (408, 566, 770, and 1024 μatm) for 10 months. The results show that the cell (inter and intra) wall thickness is maintained, but there is a reduction in growth rate (linear extension) at all elevated pCO2. Furthermore a decrease in Mg content at the two highest CO2 treatments was observed. Comparison between our data and that at 3 months from the same long-term experiment shows that the acclimation differs over time since at 3 months, the samples cultured under high pCO2 showed a reduction in the cell (inter and intra) wall thickness but a maintained growth rate. This suggests a reallocation of the energy budget between 3 and 10 months and highlights the high degree plasticity that is present. This might provide a selective advantage in future high CO2 world.Entities:
Keywords: Climate change; coralline algae; long-term experiments; ocean acidification
Year: 2013 PMID: 24223280 PMCID: PMC3797489 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Carbonate system
Figure 1Parameters of growth and calcification of Lithothamnion glaciale under four different pCO2 levels (A) scale model of L. glaciale structure showing position of intra- and interfilament walls, (B) example of extracted synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy cube from Avizo™ of the control used to determine volume of calcite, (C) linear growth rate, (D) volume of calcite, (E) cell wall thickness intrafilament, (F) cell wall thickness interfilament. Previously published growth rates under ambient CO2 from both cultured (Blake and Maggs 2003) and natural samples (Freiwald and Henrich 1994; Halfar et al. 2000) shown by light pink box. The gray data points are from 3 months with 10 months shown as blue data points. All 3-month data as previously published by Ragazzola et al. 2012. Number of replicates n = 4; horizontal error bars display the standard deviation of μatm CO2 during the incubation period. Vertical error bars display the standard deviation of measurements within the same treatment.
Statistic
| df | MS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth rates | ||||
| Two-way ANOVA | ||||
| CO2 treatments | ns | 3 | 0.028 | 2.538 |
| Months | *** | 1 | 0.628 | 56.576 |
| CO2 treatments x months | *** | 3 | 0.083 | 7.471 |
| Residual 56 | ||||
| All pairwise comparison: Holm–Sidak Method | ||||
| | 566 μatm | 770 μatm | 1024 μatm | |
| 408 μatm | ** | *** | *** | |
| 566 μatm | – | ns | ns | |
| 770 μatm | – | – | ns | |
| Cell wall thickness (intra filaments) | ||||
| Two-way ANOVA | ||||
| CO2 treatments | ns | 3 | 0.012 | 0.350 |
| Months | *** | 1 | 1.907 | 54.883 |
| CO2 treatments x months | *** | 3 | 0.297 | 8.550 |
| Residual 24 | ||||
| All pairwise comparison: Holm–Sidak Method | ||||
| | 566 μatm | 770 μatm | 1024 μatm | |
| 408 μatm | ns | ns | ns | |
| 566 μatm | – | ns | ns | |
| 770 μatm | – | – | ns | |
| Cell wall thickness (inter filaments) | ||||
| Two-way ANOVA | ||||
| CO2 treatments | *** | 3 | 0.187 | 15.627 |
| Months | *** | 1 | 1.672 | 139.746 |
| CO2 treatments x months | *** | 3 | 13.482 | 13.482 |
| Residual 24 | ||||
| All pairwise comparison: Holm–Sidak method | ||||
| | 566 μatm | 770 μatm | 1024 μatm | |
| 408 μatm | ns | ns | ns | |
| 566 μatm | – | ns | ns | |
| 770 μatm | – | – | ns | |
| Volume of Calcite | ||||
| One-way ANOVA | ||||
| | ||||
| CO2 treatments | ns | 3 | 3.97E+09 | 3.400 |
| Mg/Ca (Before/After the Alizarin staining) | ||||
| Mann–Whitney | ||||
| | P | |||
| 408 μatm | ns | |||
| 566 μatm | ns | |||
| 770 μatm | *** | |||
| 1024 μatm | *** | |||
ns, P > 0.05; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01;***P < 0.001.
Figure 2MgCO3 [mol%] under the four different pCO2 levels (n = 4). Three transects were taken from each electron probe map and averaged with data displayed to the right. The red line demarks the start of the experiment. Reconstructed temperature (°C) is shown on the secondary vertical axis using Lithothamnion glaciale temperature equation from Kamenos et al. 2008.