| Literature DB >> 24223274 |
Catalina Monzón-Argüello1, Carlos Garcia de Leaniz, Gonzalo Gajardo, Sofia Consuegra.
Abstract
The ability of invasive species to adapt to novel conditions depends on population size and environmental mismatch, but also on genetic variation. Away from their native range, invasive species confronted with novel selective pressures may display different levels of neutral versus functional genetic variation. However, the majority of invasion studies have only examined genetic variation at neutral markers, which may reveal little about how invaders adapt to novel environments. Salmonids are good model systems to examine adaptation to novel pressures because they have been translocated all over the world and represent major threats to freshwater biodiversity in the Southern Hemisphere, where they have become invasive. We examined patterns of genetic differentiation at seven putatively neutral (microsatellites) loci and one immune-related major histocompatibility complex (MHC class II-β) locus among introduced rainbow trout living in captivity (farmed) or under natural conditions (naturalized) in Chilean Patagonia. A significant positive association was found between differentiation at neutral and functional markers, highlighting the role of neutral evolutionary forces in shaping genetic variation at immune-related genes in salmonids. However, functional (MHC) genetic diversity (but not microsatellite diversity) decreased with time spent in the wild since introduction, suggesting that there was selection against alleles associated with captive rearing of donor populations that do not provide an advantage in the wild. Thus, although high genetic diversity may initially enhance fitness in translocated populations, it does not necessarily reflect invasion success, as adaptation to novel conditions may result in rapid loss of functional MHC diversity.Entities:
Keywords: Aquaculture escapes; Oncorhynchus mykiss; biological invasions; rainbow trout; rapid evolution; selection
Year: 2013 PMID: 24223274 PMCID: PMC3797483 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Sampling locations of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations in Chile. Free-living and farm populations are represented by open and closed circles, respectively. Each pie chart represents the proportion of escapees (black), hybrids (gray), and naturalized (white) trout across the 10 free-living populations. Map created using Maptool (http://www.seaturtle.org/maptool).
Diversity indices for the MHC class II-β locus and seven microsatellite (Microsat) markers in (A) 14 rainbow trout populations of Chilean Patagonia (including 10 free-living populations and four farms) and (B) individuals grouped according to the time spent in the wild (farmed, escapes, hybrids, and naturalized) based on admixture analysis
| (A) Free-living populations and farms | |||||||
| Encanto | MHC IIβ | 23 | 11 | 9.118 | 0.913 | 0.865 | 0.470 |
| Microsat | 7.429 (2.225) | 6.412 (1.567) | 0.737 (0.139) | 0.750 (0.092) | |||
| Nilque | MHC IIβ | 23 | 12 | 9.255 | 0.826 | 0.850 | 0.216 |
| Microsat | 6.714 (1.380) | 6.135 (1.030) | 0.615 (0.171) | 0.760 (0.046) | |||
| Pescadero | MHC IIβ | 24 | 16 | 12.752 | 0.958 | 0.928 | 0.817 |
| Microsat | 7.429 (2.507) | 6.455 (1.744) | 0.643 (0.186) | 0.753 (0.072) | |||
| Bl-Corrent | MHC IIβ | 20 | 11 | 9.422 | 0.842 | 0.824 | 0.668 |
| Microsat | 6.875 (2.545) | 6.253 (1.991) | 0.627 (0.196) | 0.744 (0.153) | |||
| U23 | MHC IIβ | 17 | 14 | 12.410 | 0.941 | 0.914 | 0.977 |
| Microsat | 7.286 (3.352) | 7.023 (2.929) | 0.739 (0.165) | 0.798 (0.077) | |||
| Aitoy | MHC IIβ | 16 | 12 | 11.282 | 0.813 | 0.913 | 0.875 |
| Microsat | 7.714 (2.870) | 7.478 (2.618) | 0.767 (0.179) | 0.830 (0.069) | |||
| Pangal | MHC IIβ | 16 | 14 | 12.693 | 0.875 | 0.885 | 0.992 |
| Microsat | 6.714 (2.430) | 6.425 (2.179) | 0.739 (0.137) | 0.764 (0.119) | |||
| Bonito | MHC IIβ | 24 | 12 | 9.197 | 0.727 | 0.836 | 0.363 |
| Microsat | 7.714 (2.628) | 6.592 (1.901) | 0.690 (0.089) | 0.768 (0.065) | |||
| Gol-Gol | MHC IIβ | 24 | 9 | 7.409 | 0.792 | 0.822 | 0.216 |
| Microsat | 7.143 (2.795) | 5.906 (1.869) | 0.678 (0.109) | 0.716 (0.080) | |||
| Cendoya | MHC IIβ | 24 | 5 | 4.988 | 0.792 | 0.794 | 0.004 |
| Microsat | 4.857 (1.464) | 4.283 (1.100) | 0.554 (0.266) | 0.588 (0.191) | |||
| Farm 1 | MHC IIβ | 24 | 13 | 9.458 | 0.958 | 0.839 | 0.004 |
| Microsat | 7.286 (2.289) | 6.188 (1.929) | 0.696 (0.179) | 0.725 (0.109) | |||
| Farm 2 | MHC IIβ | 24 | 11 | 8.331 | 0.833 | 0.738 | 0.480 |
| Microsat | 7.429 (2.507) | 6.822 (2.024) | 0.753 (0.216) | 0.814 (0.071) | |||
| Farm 3 | MHC IIβ | 22 | 20 | 14.506 | 0.909 | 0.928 | 0.555 |
| Microsat | 8.429 (3.952) | 7.348 (2.977) | 0.760 (0.093) | 0.790 (0.094) | |||
| Farm 4 | MHC IIβ | 24 | 11 | 9.497 | 0.956 | 0.859 | 0.201 |
| Microsat | 7.429 (2.637) | 6.495 (2.117) | 0.657 (0.248) | 0.753 (0.090) | |||
| (B) Individuals grouped by time spent in the wild | |||||||
| Farmed | MHC IIβ | 94 | 29 | 19.807 (0.452) | 0.914 | – | – |
| Microsat | 11.571 (6.133) | 9.745 (4.063) | 0.717 (0.159) | – | |||
| Escapee | MHC IIβ | 33 | 23 | 22.313 (0.188) | 0.970 | – | – |
| Microsat | 10 (4.761) | 9.862 (4.605) | 0.712 (0.111) | – | |||
| Hybrid | MHC IIβ | 92 | 25 | 17.473 (0.428) | 0.810 | – | – |
| Microsat | 11.571 (5.682) | 9.351 (3.944) | 0.673 (0.124) | – | – | ||
| Naturalized | MHC IIβ | 85 | 20 | 13.630 (0.390) | 0.833 | – | |
| Microsat | 10.857 (5.014) | 8.712 (3.115) | 0.658 (0.118) | – | |||
N, sample size; K, number of observed alleles; AR, allelic richness; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; and J', Pielou's J' evenness population admixture index; Bl-Corrent, Blanco-Correntoso. Standard deviation values are in brackets.
Figure 2Relationship between MHC class II-β allelic richness (AR). Open and closed circles represent free-living and farm populations, respectively.
Figure 3Allelic richness curves (AR; A) and 95% CI estimated using PAST for farmed, escapees, hybrids, and naturalized rainbow trout.
Pairwise FST values for seven microsatellite loci (above diagonal) and MHC class II-β (below diagonal) among trout grouped according to the time spent in the wild (farmed, escapee, hybrid, and naturalized)
| Farmed | Escapee | Hybrid | Naturalized | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmed | – | |||
| Escapee | – | |||
| Hybrid | 0.005 | – | ||
| Naturalized | 0.005 | – |
Significant values after sequential Bonferroni correction (P = 0.012) are in bold.
Significant pairwise comparisons based on the exact test of population differentiation.
Figure 4Frequency distribution of MHC class II-β alleles in farmed trout (black), recent escapees (dark gray), hybrids (light gray), and naturalized fish (white). Only the most discriminating alleles are shown (threshold value = 50%). All pairwise comparisons were significantly different except between hybrids and escapees and between hybrids and naturalized fish.