| Literature DB >> 24223059 |
Ramar Perumal Samy1, Jayapal Manikandan, Mohammed Al Qahtani.
Abstract
Traditional medicine plays a vital role for primary health care in India, where it is widely practiced to treat various ailments. Among those obtained from the healers, 78 medicinal plants were scientifically evaluated for antibacterial activity. Methanol extract of plants (100 μ g of residue) was tested against the multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Forty-seven plants showed strong activity against Burkholderia pseudomallei (strain TES and KHW) and Staphylococcus aureus, of which Tragia involucrata L., Citrus acida Roxb. Hook.f., and Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa ex Roxb. showed powerful inhibition of bacteria. Eighteen plants displayed only a moderate effect, while six plants failed to provide any evidence of inhibition against the tested bacteria. Purified compounds showed higher antimicrobial activity than crude extracts. The compounds showed less toxic effect to the human skin fibroblasts (HEPK) cells than their corresponding aromatic fractions. Phytochemical screening indicates that the presence of various secondary metabolites may be responsible for this activity. Most of the plant extracts contained high levels of phenolic or polyphenolic compounds and exhibited activity against MDR pathogens. In conclusion, plants are promising agents that deserve further exploration. Lead molecules available from such extracts may serve as potential antimicrobial agents for future drug development to combat diseases caused by the MDR bacterial strains as reported in this study.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24223059 PMCID: PMC3816052 DOI: 10.1155/2013/525613
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1(a) The site for collection of medicinal plants in Western and Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu. (b) The landmark (map) of traditional medicine distribution and collection of different types of plants. (c) District map showing the collection site of plants from Kalrayan hills (Salem), (d) Pachamalai hills (Thiruchirappalli), and (e) Mundanthurai (Tirunelveli) rich biodiversity hot-spot of the Western Ghats. (f) Kolli hills (Namakkal), (g) Javadi hills (Vellore), part of the Eastern Ghats, which is a mountain range that runs mostly parallel to the east coast of South India.
Figure 2Diverse biodiversity richness of medicinal plants in Western and Eastern Ghats. (a) Topography of plant covering area in Kolli hills (Namakkal district, Tamil Nadu). (b) Aerial view of occurrence of medicinal plants in Mundanthurai hills (Tirunelveli district, TN). (c) Pachamalai hills (Trichy district) and its natural vegetation inhabitants for Malaiyali tribes. (d) Deforestation of natural herbal resources due to urbanization in Kalrayan hills (Salem district) in the Eastern Ghats of TN. (e) Medicinal plants and its various parts used by the natives (traditional healers) for the treatment of diverse human illness with a very high percentage of leaves and whole plants often used for herbal drug preparation by the local practitioners. (f) Various category of plants like shrub, herb, climbers and tree, and the parts used in medicine.
Some of the important traditional medicinal plant species, families, voucher specimens, parts used, yield of extracts, phytochemical screening, and toxicity on human macrophage cells.
| Scientific name | Family | Voucher specimen | Plant parts | Yield (gm) | Phytochemical analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Acanthaceae | D2020 | Leaf | 6.4 | Vasicine |
|
| Rutaceae | D2018 | Root-bark | 5.8 | Alkaloids |
|
| Alangiaceae | 0140 | Leaf | 6.3 | Phenolic |
|
| Acanthaceae | 0061 | Leaf | 6.8 | Andrographolide |
|
| Acanthaceae | 0116 | Leaf | 7.0 | Terpenoids, |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | 29644 | Leaf | 6.1 | Acalyphe |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | 15791 | Leaf | 7.1 | Alkaloids |
|
| Amaranthaceae | 2666 | Leaf | 2.7 | Betaine |
|
| Asteraceae | 4812 | Leaf | 3.7 | Essential oils |
|
| Acanthaceae | 0234 | Stem | 7.4 | Glycosides |
|
| Meliaceae | D0204 | Leaf, bark | 6.7 | Tannins |
|
| Arecaceae | D0202 | Root | 0.8 | Flavonoids, phenolics |
|
| Nyctaginaceae | 10897 | Whole plant | 2.8 | Phenolics |
|
| Asclepiadaceae | D073 | Root-bark | 1.3 | Terpenoids |
|
| Asclepiadaceae | D070 | Milky latex | 4.8 | Alkaloids |
|
| Caesalpiniaceae | 0141 | Leaf | 4.9 | Saponins |
|
| Caesalpiniaceae | 0111 | Root | 9.5 | Flavonoids, saponins |
|
| Caesalpiniaceae | 0100 | Stem, bark | 6.9 | Saponins |
|
| Caesalpiniaceae | 037 | Whole plant | 7.9 | Saponins |
|
| Sapindaceae | 0125 | Whole plant | 5.8 | Flavonoids |
|
| Apocynaceae | 0029 | Leaf, | 1.4 | Alkaloids |
|
| Lauraceae | 00209 | Bark | 3.1 | Essential oil, Tannin |
|
| Lauraceae | 043-c | Leaf, bark | Alkaloids | |
|
| Vitaceae | D02023 | Leaf | 6.8 | Glycosides |
|
| Rutaceae | 0213 | Leaf | 5.2 | Saponins, Terpenoids |
|
| Umbelliferae | 0138 | Whole plant | 8.9 | Flavonoids, Alkaloids |
|
| Verbenaceae | D02043 | Stem | 7.8 | Sterols, diterpenes |
|
| Papilionaceae | D02026 | Seed | 9.8 | Protein |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | 0011 | Whole plant | 0.03 | Cleistanthin, collinusin |
|
| Capparidaceae | 12247 | Leaf | 6.2 | Glycosides |
|
| Capparidaceae | 29999 | Leaf | 2.7 | Phenolics |
|
| Cucurbitaceae | D02030 | Leaf, root | 0.9 | Glycosides |
|
| Gramineae | D012 | Root | 0.25 | Essential oil |
|
| Solanaceae | D02038 | Leaf, stem | 3.9 | Steroids |
|
| Myrtaceae | D0220 | Leaf | 1.2 | Terpenoids |
|
| Asteraceae | D028 | Whole plant | 0.7 | Phenolic |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | 0018-c | Whole plant | 0.12 | — |
|
| Asteraceae | D210 | Leaf | 1.10 | Triterpenoid, saponin |
|
| Myrtaceae | 0025 | Flower buds | 1.16 | Essential oils |
|
| Zingiberaceae | 0009 | Fruit pods | 3.17 | Essential oils |
|
| Liliaceae | 020-S | Tuber | 1.08 | Alkaloids, phenol |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | 015 | Whole plant | 5.3 | Alkaloids, flavonoids |
|
| Lamiaceae | 24688 | Leaf | 6.3 | Essential oil |
|
| Asclepiadaceae | D-009 | Roots | Coumarins | |
|
| Apocynaceae | 0110 | Root, flower | 7.3 | Terpenoids |
|
| Labiatae | 0114 | Leaf | 8.3 | Triterpenes |
|
| Lythraceae | T261 | Leaf | 0.9 | Glycosides, phenolic |
|
| Sapotaceae | D01415 | Nut | 9.3 | Sitosterol |
|
| Convolvulaceae | 10894 | Whole plant | 4.0 | Alkaloids |
|
| Lamiaceae | 0217-c | Whole plant | 0.7 | Essential oils |
|
| Rubiaceae | 0122 | Leaf | 1.4 | Glycosides |
|
| Mimosaceae | 0071 | Whole plant | 0.6 | — |
|
| Rubiaceae | D02047 | Leaf | 4.4 | Alkaloids |
|
| Lamiaceae | 0016 | Whole plant | 3.0 | Alkaloids |
|
| Piperaceae | 007 | Flower | 4.6 | Alkaloids |
|
| Plumbaginaceae | 0121 | Root | 4.8 |
|
|
| Lamiaceae | 0410 | Whole plant | 1.2 | Essential oils, terpenoids |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | 0120 | Whole plant | 4.9 | Polyphenol |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | 0117 | Whole plant | 5.0 | Polyphenol |
|
| Verbenaceae | 0129 | Leaf | 5.3 | Diterpenes |
|
| Lamiaceae | 0017 | Root | 0.23 | Essential oils |
|
| Apocynaceae | 020-S | Root | 1.15 | Alkaloid |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | 0034 | Leaf | 1.1 | Polyphenol |
|
| Solanaceae | D02054 | Leaf, flower | 4.0 | Tannins |
|
| Asteraceae | D02060 | Whole plant | 1.0 | Essential oil |
|
| Gentianaceae | D0540 | Whole plant | 1.6 | Glycodises |
|
| Loganiaceae | S-22 | Nuts | 0.36 | Alkaloids |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | D068 | Leaves | 1.6 | Shellsol |
|
| Menispermaceae | 0118 | Leaf, | 5.0 | Glycosides, tannins |
|
| Compositae | 10649 | Leaf | 1.8 | Flavonoids |
|
| Combretaceae | 033-c | Bark | 8.0 | Phenolics |
|
| Fabaceae | S-43 | Whole plant | 0.8 | Isoflavone |
|
| Verbenaceae | 0031 | Leaf | 2.4 | Terpineol |
|
| Gramineae | 0051 | Root | 1.03 | Essential oil |
|
| Solanaceae | D02063 | Root | 2.1 | Alkaloids |
|
| Asteraceae | S-24 | Leaves | Flavonoids | |
|
| Zingiberaceae | 0327 | Rhizome | 2.3 | Tannins |
|
| Rutaceae | 009 | Bark | 1.9 | Alkaloids, essential oil |
Class of chemical compounds: A: alkaloids, S: saponins, T: tannins, St: steroids, G: glycosides, T: terpenoids, P: polyphenol, P: phenolics, Sh: shellsol, H: hydrocarbon esters.
Figure 3Medicinal aromatic herbs, spices, and toxic plants were collected from the tribal areas of the Western and Eastern Ghats region in Tamil Nadu, India. (a) A. vasica Nees (leaf), (b) Eclipta alba (L.) Hassk. (whole plant), (c) Mimosa pudica L. (whole plant), (d) P. amboinicus (L.) Spreng. (whole plant), (e) T. procumbens (L.) (whole plant), (f) Euphorbia hirta Linn (whole plant), (g) A. paniculata Wallich ex Nees, (H) C. roseus (L.) G.Don. (whole plant) used for therapy. (i) Cinnamomum iners Reinw. ex Blume (leaf) (j) E. globulus Labill. (leaf and bark), (k) Z. officinale Rosc. (Rhizome), (l) E. caryophyllus (Sprengel) Bullock and Harrison (flower buds), (m) M. piperita L. (whole plant), (n) C. citratus (DC.) Clitoria ternatea L. (whole plant), (o) C. zeylanicum Garcin ex Blume (bark), (p) Elettaria cardamomum White et Mason (fruit pod) used for medicine and food preparation.
Antimicrobial activity of methanol extract of aromatic medicinal plants and essential oils evaluated against multidrug resistant (MDR) human pathogens at 100 µg/mL concentration.
| Scientific name | Microorganisms; growth inhibition zones (6 millimeter in diameters) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 28 | 19 | 22 | 18 | 12 | — | 10 | 17 | 16 | — |
|
| 29 | 17 | 9 | 10 | — | 15 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 15 | 10 | 8 | 8 | — | 12 | 9 | 10 | — | — |
|
| 12 | 9 | — | — | — | 17 | 8 | 9 | — | — |
|
| 26 | 21 | 19 | 13 | — | 25 | 8 | 16 | 12 | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | 18 | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | 12 | 13 | — | 10 | — | — | 21 | — |
|
| — | — | 7 | 14 | — | 15 | 12 | 11 | — | — |
|
| 10 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| 16 | 12 | — | — | — | 15 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 15 | 17 | 21 | 16 | 14 | 23 | 12 | 14 | — | — |
|
| 9 | 10 | 17 | 8 | — | — | 9 | 10 | — | — |
|
| — | — | 8 | 9 | 7 | 16 | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | 15 | — | 18 | 28 | 9 | — | — | — |
|
| 11 | 9 | — | — | — | 20 | — | — | 9 | 8 |
|
| 23 | — | — | 14 | — | 9 | 19 | — | — | — |
|
| 13 | 7 | 12 | 9 | — | 15 | 11 | 8 | — | — |
|
| 17 | 13 | 12 | — | — | 19 | 13 | — | — | — |
|
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| 26 | 22 | — | 12 | 29 | 9 | 13 | 8 | — | |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| 14 | 16 | 7 | 20 | — | 22 | 19 | 7 | — | — |
|
| 20 | 16 | — | 15 | — | 16 | 12 | — | — | — |
|
| — | 9 | — | 10 | — | 7 | — | 8 | — | — |
|
| 9 | 8 | — | — | — | 11 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 13 | 7 | 12 | — | — | 15 | 11 | 8 | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| 16 | 12 | — | 13 | — | 8 | 10 | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | 12 | 19 | 11 | — | 9 | 15 | 12 | — |
|
| — | — | 8 | 10 | 14 | 20 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 9 | 10 | 17 | 8 | — | — | 9 | 10 | — | — |
|
| 16 | 18 | — | 17 | — | 14 | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| 20 | — | — | 9 | — | — | 10 | — | — | — |
|
| 11 | — | — | — | — | 16 | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | 7 | — | — | — | 7 | — | — |
|
| — | 7 | — | 11 | — | 9 | — | 8 | — | — |
|
| 21 | 20 | 7 | 14 | — | 22 | 12 | 17 | — | — |
|
| 8 | 10 | 8 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | 8 | — | 11 | — | 12 | — | 7 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 17 | 8 | — | 12 | 9 | 10 | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| 18 | 16 | 14 | 19 | 12 | — | 8 | 7 | 9 | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| 23 | 17 | 26 | 12 | 20 | 25 | 19 | — | — | — |
|
| 12 | 9 | 11 | 7 | — | 15 | 7 | 8 | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | 17 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 13 | 7 | 12 | 21 | — | 17 | 11 | 8 | — | — |
|
| 9 | 10 | 17 | 8 | — | 12 | 9 | 10 | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | 8 | 11 | 15 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 7 | 8 | — | 9 | — | 9 | 18 | 7 | — | — |
|
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| 13 | 10 | — | 15 | — | 9 | 10 | — | — | — |
|
| 17 | 16 | 7 | 8 | — | 15 | — | — | — | 8 |
|
| 19 | 12 | — | 17 | — | 13 | 19 | 8 | — | — |
|
| — | — | 13 | 9 | — | 8 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 20 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 22 | — | 11 | 9 | — | 16 |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | 16 | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | — | 23 | 16 | — | 12 | 15 | — | — | — |
|
| 9 | 8 | 7 | — | — | 14 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 25 | 23 | 20 | — | — | 31 | 28 | 22 | 19 | — |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | 14 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 11 | 9 | 7 | 7 | — | 16 | — | — | 8 | |
|
| 12 | 20 | — | — | — | 15 | 12 | — | — | — |
|
| 14 | 11 | 7 | 15 | — | 7 | 12 | 7 | — | — |
|
| 13 | 7 | 12 | 9 | — | — | 11 | 8 | — | — |
| Chloramphenicol (30 | 21 | 12 | 15 | 17 | 29 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 13 | 11 |
| Ceftazidime (30 | 33 | 16 | 22 | 19 | 16 | 25 | 21 | 20 | 12 | 15 |
*Bacteria (+/−). Results obtained in the disc diffusion assay; antibacterial activity is expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3), of the inhibition by the extract and its diameter around the discs. One way analysis of variance was performed (mean ± SD, n = 3 replicates). Size of inhibition zones were including the sterile blank discs 6 millimeter (mm) in diameters. Absence of bacterial inhibition indicates (—), antibiotic disc (30 µg/disc).
Figure 4In vitro antimicrobial activity of purified fractions from the most active plant extracts tested against bacteria. Growth inhibition zones were measured and analyzed with mean ± standard deviation (SD), (n = 3) using one way analysis of variance. Level of significance at (*P > 0.01). Most of the fractions exerted a potent inhibitory effect against multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria (B. pseudomallei strains KHW and TES), K. pneumonia, and Gram-positive bacteria S. aureus.
Figure 5Comparison of antimicrobial effect of plant compounds obtained from the most popularly used sources of essential oils as assayed by the disc-diffusion method in vitro. It displayed a powerful activity against B. pseudomallei and S. aureus than the other bacteria strains. Other compounds showed only a moderate or weak action against the tested bacteria. Values for zone of bacterial growth inhibition were presented as mean ± SD, (n = 3) with level of significance at (*P > 0.01).
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of purified plant fractions and essential oils against antibiotic resistant bacteria.
| Botanical name | Family | Parts used | Gram-positive and -negative bacteria (MICs | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| Meliaceae | Seed (fraction) | 31.25 | 62.5 | 125 | <250 | 31.25 | — | — | — | — |
|
| Rutaceae | Root-bark (F) | 31.25 | 31.25 | — | — | 31.25 | 62.5 | 125 | 250 | — |
|
| Acanthaceae | Leaf (fraction) | 250 | — | 125 | — | 62.5 | — | — | 125 | — |
|
| Acanthaceae | Fraction (Stem) | 15.6 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 62.5 | — | <250 | 31.25 | 31.25 | — |
|
| Rutaceae | Leaf (fraction) | 15.6 | 62.5 | — | — | 7.8 | — | 31.25 | — | — |
|
| Acanthaceae | Fraction (WP) | 62.5 | — | 31.25 | — | 31.25 | 250 | 62.5 | — | — |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | Whole plant (F) | 31.25 | 125 | 15.6 | — | 62.5 | — | — | <250 | — |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | Shellosol (leaf) | 15.6 | 31.25 | — | — | 7.8 | 62.5 | — | — | — |
|
| Lauraceae | Bark (fraction) | 15.6 | 62.5 | — | — | 7.8 | 31.25 | — | — | 125 |
|
| Graminae | Leaf (fraction) | 250 | <250 | 62.5 | — | 62.5 | 125 | — | — | — |
|
| Myrtaceae | Flower buds (F) | 62.5 | 125 | — | — | 62.5 | — | — | — | — |
|
| Myrtaceae | Fraction (leaf) | — | — | — | — | — | — | <250 | — | <250 |
|
| Labiatae | Fraction (WP) | — | 62.5 | 31.25 | — | 31.25 | — | <250 | — | — |
|
| Labiatae | Leaf (fraction) | 62.5 | 125 | — | 31.25 | 62.5 | — | 125 | <250 | — |
|
| Labiatae | Rosemary oil | 31.25 | — | — | — | 31.25 | — | — | — | — |
|
| Graminae | Root (fraction) | — | 125 | 125 | — | — | — | >250 | >250 | |
The bacterial growth inhibitory activity was compared for significant differences within the bacterial strains by broth-dilution method at 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.6, and 7.8 µg/mL. F: fractions.