Ze-Hua Zhao1, Yu-Chen Fan, Yang Yang, Kai Wang. 1. Ze-Hua Zhao, Yu-Chen Fan, Yang Yang, Kai Wang, Department of Hepatology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Abstract
AIM: To assess diagnostic accuracy of Ras association domain family 1A (RASSF1A) promoter methylation in body fluids (serum, plasma and whole blood) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Relative information about study characteristics and incidence of RASSF1A methylation was collected. Quality of all included studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a random-effect model, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was used to demonstrate the overall diagnostic performance. Positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95%CI were also calculated. Meta-regression was applied to analyze observed heterogeneity, and Deeks' test was performed to detect publication bias. RESULTS: After a systematic literature review, seven studies with a total of 302 cases of HCC and 250 cases of chronic liver diseases were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.70 (95%CI: 0.49-0.85) and 0.72 (95%CI: 0.54-0.85), respectively. The PLR was 2.51 (95%CI: 1.64-3.86), NLR was 0.41 (95%CI: 0.25-0.68), and DOR was 6.13 (95%CI: 3.17-11.84). The χ(2) values of sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 59.41 (P < 0.001), 50.50 (P < 0.001), 17.40 (P = 0.010), 31.24 (P < 0.001) and 80.51 (P < 0.001), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.77 (95%CI: 0.73-0.81). Three factors were analyzed by univariate meta-regression and none was significant to interpret the observed heterogeneity (P > 0.05). No significant publication bias was detected by Deeks' test (P = 0.346). CONCLUSION: We showed the potential diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation in body fluids in HCC patients and it may improve diagnostic accuracy combined with the α-fetoprotein test.
AIM: To assess diagnostic accuracy of Ras association domain family 1A (RASSF1A) promoter methylation in body fluids (serum, plasma and whole blood) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Relative information about study characteristics and incidence of RASSF1A methylation was collected. Quality of all included studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a random-effect model, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was used to demonstrate the overall diagnostic performance. Positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95%CI were also calculated. Meta-regression was applied to analyze observed heterogeneity, and Deeks' test was performed to detect publication bias. RESULTS: After a systematic literature review, seven studies with a total of 302 cases of HCC and 250 cases of chronic liver diseases were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.70 (95%CI: 0.49-0.85) and 0.72 (95%CI: 0.54-0.85), respectively. The PLR was 2.51 (95%CI: 1.64-3.86), NLR was 0.41 (95%CI: 0.25-0.68), and DOR was 6.13 (95%CI: 3.17-11.84). The χ(2) values of sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 59.41 (P < 0.001), 50.50 (P < 0.001), 17.40 (P = 0.010), 31.24 (P < 0.001) and 80.51 (P < 0.001), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.77 (95%CI: 0.73-0.81). Three factors were analyzed by univariate meta-regression and none was significant to interpret the observed heterogeneity (P > 0.05). No significant publication bias was detected by Deeks' test (P = 0.346). CONCLUSION: We showed the potential diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation in body fluids in HCC patients and it may improve diagnostic accuracy combined with the α-fetoprotein test.
Entities:
Keywords:
Biomarker; Diagnostic sensitivity; Diagnostic specificity; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Methylation; Ras association domain family 1A
Authors: K C Allen Chan; Paul B S Lai; Tony S K Mok; Henry L Y Chan; Chunming Ding; S W Yeung; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Surbhi Jain; Lijia Xie; Batbold Boldbaatar; Selena Y Lin; James P Hamilton; Stephen J Meltzer; Shun-Hua Chen; Chi-Tan Hu; Timothy M Block; Wei Song; Ying-Hsiu Su Journal: Hepatol Res Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 4.288
Authors: Oscar C Araújo; Agatha S Rosa; Arlete Fernandes; Christian Niel; Cristiane A Villela-Nogueira; Vera Pannain; Natalia M Araujo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240