Literature DB >> 24222958

Complications and survival in patients undergoing colonic stenting for malignant obstruction.

Majid A Almadi1, Nahla Azzam, Othman Alharbi, Alabbas H Mohammed, Nazia Sadaf, Abdulrahman M Aljebreen.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate whether predicting patients that might be at a higher risk for complications might serve to improve the selection of patients undergoing colonic stenting.
METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent an attempted self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) insertion for malignant colonic obstruction between November 2006 and March 2013. All patients were either referred for preoperative colonic decompression with the intent of a single surgical procedure, or for palliation of the malignant colorectal obstruction for unresectable cancer. Fisher's test or χ(2) test was performed on categorical variables, and the t test for continuous variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine the association between independent variables and the presence of complications from SEMS insertion.
RESULTS: SEMS insertion was attempted in 73 patients. Males comprised 55.71% and the mean age was 67.41 ± 12.41 years. Of these, 65.15% underwent subsequent surgery, while 34.85% received SEMS as palliation for advanced disease. Extracolonic tumors were only 4.76%. The majority of patients had stage IV disease (63.83%), while the remainder had stage III (36.17%). SEMS were successfully inserted in 93.85% (95%CI: 87.85%-99.85%). Perforations occurred in 4.10%, SEMS migration in 8.21%, and stent re-occlusion from ingrowth occurred in 2.74% of patients. The mean duration of follow up for the patients was 13.52 ± 17.48 mo (range 0-73 mo). None of the variables: age, sex, time between the onset of symptoms to SEMS insertion, time between SEMS insertion and surgery, length of the stenosis, location of the stenosis, albumin level, or receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, could predict the development of complications from either SEMS insertion nor prolonged survival.
CONCLUSION: None of the variables could predict the development of complications or survival. Further studies are required to identify patients who would benefit the most from SEMS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonic obstruction; Colonic stents; Colorectal cancer; Complications; Emergency surgery; Endoscopy; Enteric stenting; Palliative interventions; Self-expanding metal stent

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24222958      PMCID: PMC3819550          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  37 in total

1.  Comparison of treatment outcomes of endoscopic stenting for colonic and extracolonic malignant obstruction.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Sang Gyun Kim; Jong Pil Im; Joo Sung Kim; Hyun Chae Jung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Colonic stenting vs emergent surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guang-Yao Ye; Zhe Cui; Lu Chen; Ming Zhong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The outcome after stent placement or surgery as the initial treatment for obstructive primary tumor in patients with stage IV colon cancer.

Authors:  Won-Suk Lee; Jeong-Heum Baek; Jin Mo Kang; Sangtae Choi; Kwang An Kwon
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Clinical outcomes of palliative self-expanding metallic stents in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction.

Authors:  Byung Chang Kim; Kyung Su Han; Chang Won Hong; Dae Kyung Sohn; Ji Won Park; Sung Chan Park; Sun Young Kim; Ji Yeon Baek; Hyo Seong Choi; Hee Jin Chang; Dae Yong Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.325

5.  Endolaparoscopic approach vs conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hester Yui Shan Cheung; Chi Chiu Chung; Wilson Wen Chieng Tsang; James Cheuk Hoo Wong; Kevin Kwok Kay Yau; Michael Ka Wah Li
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-12

6.  Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing endoscopic stenting and surgical decompression for colorectal cancer obstruction.

Authors:  Vincenzo Cennamo; Carmelo Luigiano; Federico Coccolini; Carlo Fabbri; Marco Bassi; Giuseppe De Caro; Liza Ceroni; Antonella Maimone; Paolo Ravelli; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A comparative study of short- and medium-term outcomes comparing emergent surgery and stenting as a bridge to surgery in patients with acute malignant colonic obstruction.

Authors:  Dara O Kavanagh; Blathnaid Nolan; Ciaran Judge; John M P Hyland; Hugh E Mulcahy; P Ronan O'Connell; Des C Winter; Glen A Doherty
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Use of colonic stents in emergent malignant left colonic obstruction: a Markov chain Monte Carlo decision analysis.

Authors:  Anand Govindarajan; David Naimark; Natalie G Coburn; Andrew J Smith; Calvin H L Law
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Oncologic outcomes of self-expanding metallic stent insertion as a bridge to surgery in the management of left-sided colon cancer obstruction: comparison with nonobstructing elective surgery.

Authors:  Jin Soo Kim; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Safety and efficacy of endoscopic colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in the management of intestinal obstruction due to left colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Eriberto Farinella; Stefano Trastulli; Jacopo Desiderio; Chiara Listorti; Carlo Boselli; Amilcare Parisi; Giuseppe Noya; Jayesh Sagar
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 3.279

View more
  6 in total

1.  Palliative Stenting for Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction: Stents for All?

Authors:  Jorge Canena
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-08

2.  [Colonic stenting: an opportunity with a risk : A critical evaluation].

Authors:  R Albrecht; H Hönicke; C Bochmann; U Settmacher; T Wirth
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  The factors influencing long-term outcomes of stenting for malignant colorectal obstruction in elderly group in community medicine.

Authors:  Michitaka Imai; Kenya Kamimura; Yoshifumi Takahashi; Toshihiro Sato; Osamu Isokawa; Masaki Maruyama; Takamasa Kobayashi; Kazunao Hayashi; Shuji Terai
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Analysis of risk factors associated with complications of colonic stenting for malignant obstruction.

Authors:  Gokhan Dindar; Yucel Ustundag; Tarkan Karakan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Emergency management with resection versus proximal stoma or stent treatment and planned resection in malignant left-sided colon obstruction.

Authors:  Emma Öistämö; Fredrik Hjern; Lennart Blomqvist; Ylva Falkén; Klas Pekkari; Mirna Abraham-Nordling
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Comparison of short-term outcome between diverting colostomy and colonic stent as a bridge to surgery for left colonic malignant obstruction.

Authors:  Won Beom Jung; Jin Yong Shin; Jong Kwon Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.