| Literature DB >> 24222853 |
Ahmed Al-Motarreb1, Adel Shabana, Ayman El-Menyar.
Abstract
Background. Khat chewing is a common habit in Yemen despite increased evidence of its negative impact on the cardiovascular system. Aims. We aimed to study the epicardial coronary arteries in khat chewers presenting with myocardial infarction (AMI). Materials and Methods. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2008 and May 2009 in Yemen. AMI patients who underwent coronary angiogram were enrolled and divided into groups (gp): gp1 (diabetic and khat chewers), gp2 (khat chewers and nondiabetic), and gp3 (diabetic and non-khat users). Results. Of 347 AMI patients 63%, 21%, and 16% were in gp 2, 3, and 1, respectively. Khat chewers were younger in comparison to non-khat users. Group 3 patients were more likely to have multivessel disease, severe left anterior descending (LAD), right coronary artery (RCA) stenosis and total RCA, and left circumflex (Lcx) occlusion compared to other groups. Group 1 patients were more likely to have total LAD occlusion and severe Lcx lesions. In multivariate analysis, age, diabetes mellitus, and smoking were significant independent predictors for significant coronary artery lesions; however, khat chewing did not show such association. Conclusions. Coronary spasm is the main mechanism of AMI in khat chewers. The impact of our finding for risk stratification and management warrants further studies.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24222853 PMCID: PMC3814045 DOI: 10.1155/2013/857019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Vasc Med ISSN: 2090-2824
Figure 1Khat tree and how khat users chew and keep it for few hours in their mouth cavity.
Demographic, clinical presentation, and coronary morphology in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
| DM and khat | Khat and non-DM | DM and non-khat |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (%) | 55 (16%) | 219 (63%) | 73 (21%) | |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 54 ± 10 | 52 ± 10 | 57 ± 9 | 0.001 |
| Females % | 13 | 12 | 30 | 0.001 |
| Myocardial infarction % | 86 | 80 | 77 | 0.46 |
| Hypertension % | 46 | 33 | 49 | 0.02 |
| Current tobacco users % | 49 | 48 | 26 | 0.001 |
| Received thrombolytics % | 15 | 12 | 19 | 0.38 |
| Coronary angiographic findings | ||||
| Left main disease % | 5.5 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 0.34 |
| LAD 70%–95% | 26 | 14 | 32 | 0.005 |
| Total LAD occlusion % | 15 | 11 | 12 | 0.005 |
| 1st diagonal (D1) > 70% | 3.6 | 8.2 | 9.6 | 0.90 |
| D2 > 70% | 5.5 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 0.72 |
| 1st obtuse marginal (OM) > 70% | 12.7 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 0.008 |
| OM2 > 70% | 7.3 | 4.1 | 6.8 | 0.49 |
| LCx 70%–95% | 26 | 9 | 15 | 0.02 |
| LCx total occlusion % | 0 | 2.7 | 4.1 | 0.02 |
| RCA 70%–95% | 12.7 | 12 | 26 | 0.006 |
| RCA total occlusion % | 5.5 | 6.8 | 8.2 | 0.006 |
| PAD > 70% | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.71 |
| Normal coronary % | 29 | 44 | 19 | 0.001 |
| 1-vessel disease % | 31 | 24 | 21 | |
| 2-vessel disease % | 22 | 13 | 33 | |
| 3-vessel disease % | 7 | 5 | 11 | |
| Nonsignificant lesions % | 40 | 58 | 36 | 0.001 |
| Location of myocardial infarction (MI) % | ||||
| Anterior MI % | 73 | 63 | 72 | 0.64 |
| Lateral MI % | 4.5 | 13 | 7.5 | |
| Inferior MI % | 11.4 | 16.3 | 13.2 |
*P value comparing the 3 groups.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictors for the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis*.
| Variable | Odd Ratio | 95% confidence interval |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Khat chewing | 0.84 | 0.580–1.221 | 0.36 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2.07 | 1.367–3.165 | 0.001 |
| Hypertension | 1.18 | 0.824–1.714 | 0.35 |
| Age | 0.95 | 0.937–0.972 | 0.001 |
| Gender | 1.55 | 0.965–2.477 | 0.07 |
| Tobacco | 1.67 | 1.191–3.072 | 0.01 |
*Anatomically significant coronary artery disease was defined as a luminal stenosis greater than or equal to 50% in one or more epicardial arteries.
Figure 2The vascular effect of cathinone in pigs; a courtesy from Dr. Ahmed Al-Motarreb.