Literature DB >> 24221500

Effects of organic amendments on sulfate reduction activity, H2 consumption, and H 2 production in salt marsh sediments.

H J Dicker1, D W Smith.   

Abstract

Sulfate reduction activity (SRA) was measured via the radioactive tracer ((35)SO4 (=)) technique in sediment samples from the Canary Creek Marsh in Lewes, Delaware. Basal levels of SRA ranged from 130 to 319 nmoles of sulfate reduced/gram dry sediment/hour. With the exception of lactate and formate, all organic acids tested resulted in no stimulation of SRA, whereas straight chain alcohols (C1-C4) all gave a significant increase in SRA. In addition, H2, glucose, and cellobiose caused a twofold or greater increase in SRA, while cellulose amendments did not alter SRA. Molybdate, an inhibitor of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), caused a total inhibition in SRA. 2-Bromoethanesulfonic acid (BES), an inhibitor of methanogenic bacteria, caused a slight decrease in SRA. Hydrogen was not produced in detectable quantities in unamended samples but was produced in large amounts in glucose-amended samples. Hydrogen was rapidly consumed in unamended samples with molybdate additions causing a significant decrease in the rate of H2 consumption. A variety of organic amendments was found to stimulate H2 uptake. These studies suggest that SRB are stimulated by a large variety of organic amendments in situ and that SRB play a major role in maintaining low partial pressures of H2 in marsh sediments.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 24221500     DOI: 10.1007/BF02016814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  29 in total

1.  Microbial formation of ethane in anoxic estuarine sediments.

Authors:  R S Oremland
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Carbon and electron flow in mud and sandflat intertidal sediments at delaware inlet, nelson, new zealand.

Authors:  D O Mountfort; R A Asher; E L Mays; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations.

Authors:  D R Lovley; M J Klug
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Specificity and biological distribution of coenzyme M (2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid).

Authors:  W E Balch; R S Wolfe
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  A comparison of oxygen, nitrate, and sulfate respiration in coastal marine sediments.

Authors:  J Sørensen; B B Jørgensen; N P Revsbech
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Hydrogen as a substrate for methanogenesis and sulphate reduction in anaerobic saltmarsh sediment.

Authors:  J W Abram; D B Nedwell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1978-04-27       Impact factor: 2.552

7.  Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen.

Authors:  J W Abram; D B Nedwell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1978-04-27       Impact factor: 2.552

8.  Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description of Desulfobacter postgatei gen. nov., sp. nov.

Authors:  F Widdel; N Pfennig
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Hydrogen as an electron donor for sulfate-reducing bacteria in slurries of salt marsh sediment.

Authors:  D B Nedwell; I M Banat
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.552

View more
  1 in total

1.  Metabolism of low molecular weight organic compounds by sulfate-reducing bacteria in a Delaware salt marsh.

Authors:  H J Dicker; D W Smith
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.552

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.