Literature DB >> 24221252

ypN0 nodal status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma is not associated with adverse prognosis as compared with pN0 after primary surgery.

Katharina Erlenbach-Wünsch1, Sabine Semrau, Rainer Fietkau, Klaus Weber, Werner Hohenberger, Tilman Rau, Arndt Hartmann, Susanne Merkel, Abbas Agaimy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) has been established as standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3/4 or cN+ cM0, distance from circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm) to enhance local disease control and minimize the rate of locoregional recurrence. As a consequence of downstaging, a significant proportion of patients show non-viable tumor deposits within regional lymph nodes that qualify as ypN0 according to the current TNM classification irrespective of the actual pre-treatment status. Accordingly, the prognostic relevance of ypN0 status as compared with true pN0 without preceding nCRT is not known. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 132 patients who underwent standard total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery after nCRT for rectal carcinoma and were classified as ypN0, and compared their prognoses with those of 341 patients with pN0 without nCRT.
RESULTS: Re-evaluation of regional lymph nodes after nCRT showed no evidence of previous metastasis in 91 cases (ypN0(-)), sure but non-viable metastasis in 14 patients (ypN0(+)), and unsure status in 27 patients (ypN0(X)). The local recurrence rate, distant metastases, and disease-free, observed, and cancer-related survival were similar in all subgroups (p = 0.447, 0.695, 0.759, 0.655, and 0.354, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our results showed a similar outcome in patients with ypN0 and in the control group with pN0 regarding local recurrence rate, distant metastases, and disease-free, observed, and cancer-related survival. Validation of these results is necessary to clarify the questions regarding postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with ypN0(+).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24221252     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1790-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  17 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of disease classified as stage III in Wilms tumor: a report from the Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP).

Authors:  Filippo Spreafico; Lorenza Gandola; Paolo D'Angelo; Monica Terenziani; Paola Collini; Maurizio Bianchi; Massimo Provenzi; Paolo Indolfi; Andrea Pession; Marilina Nantron; Andrea Di Cataldo; Alfonso Marchianò; Serena Catania; Franca Fossati Bellani; Luigi Piva
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jean-François Bosset; Laurence Collette; Gilles Calais; Laurent Mineur; Philippe Maingon; Ljiljana Radosevic-Jelic; Alain Daban; Etienne Bardet; Alexander Beny; Jean-Claude Ollier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Claus Rödel; Peter Martus; Thomas Papadoupolos; Laszlo Füzesi; Martin Klimpfinger; Rainer Fietkau; Torsten Liersch; Werner Hohenberger; Rudolf Raab; Rolf Sauer; Christian Wittekind
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Tumor regression in mesorectal lymphnodes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Caricato; F Ausania; E De Dominicis; B Vincenzi; C Rabitti; G Tonini; F Cellini; R Coppola
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  O Dworak; L Keilholz; A Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Stage II/III rectal cancer with intermediate response to preoperative radiochemotherapy: do we have indications for individual risk stratification?

Authors:  Thilo Sprenger; Hilka Rothe; Klaus Jung; Hans Christiansen; Lena C Conradi; B Michael Ghadimi; Heinz Becker; Torsten Liersch
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  The prognostic value of lymph node metastases and tumour regression grade in rectal cancer patients treated with long-course preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  J Lindebjerg; K-L G Spindler; J Ploen; A Jakobsen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Lymph node status after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer is a biologic predictor of outcome.

Authors:  George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Cathy Eng; John M Skibber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pathologic processing of the total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Molly Campa-Thompson; Robert Weir; Natalie Calcetera; Philip Quirke; Susanne Carmack
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-03

2.  Which is the best postoperative chemotherapy regimen in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?

Authors:  Peng Gao; Yong-xi Song; Jing-xu Sun; Xiao-wan Chen; Ying-ying Xu; Jun-hua Zhao; Xuan-zhang Huang; Hui-mian Xu; Zhen-ning Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.