BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) status after surgery for rectal cancer is affected by preoperative radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to perform a population-based evaluation of the impact of pathologic LN status (ypN) after neoadjuvant radiotherapy on survival. METHODS: Patients undergoing radical resection for rectal adenocarcinoma were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry (1991-2004). Patient characteristics, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) by ypN stage after surgery and use of preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy were compared. RESULTS: Of the 23,809 patients identified, 12,513 received preoperative (n = 5367) or postoperative (n = 7146) radiotherapy and resection. Preoperative patients were more likely to be younger (P < .001) and histopathologically free of detectable nodal metastasis (ypN0) than postoperative (51.8% vs 31.7%, P < .001). Median total numbers of LNs (6 vs 10) and positive LNs (2 vs 3) were lower among preoperative than postoperative (P < .001 for both). OS and CSS were similar among pN0 patients. However, on proportional hazards regression, ypN+ stage was associated with an increase in relative risk for death by 21% overall (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.21; 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.35, P < .001) and 23% cancer-specific (HR = 1.23; P = .001) for preoperative compared with postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic LN status after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer is a biologic marker of prognosis. Patients who are ypN+ after preoperative are a subgroup of LN positive patients with adverse outcome. These high-risk patients should be targeted for studies of novel multidisciplinary approaches, including expanded chemo- and biologic therapies. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) status after surgery for rectal cancer is affected by preoperative radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to perform a population-based evaluation of the impact of pathologic LN status (ypN) after neoadjuvant radiotherapy on survival. METHODS:Patients undergoing radical resection for rectal adenocarcinoma were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry (1991-2004). Patient characteristics, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) by ypN stage after surgery and use of preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy were compared. RESULTS: Of the 23,809 patients identified, 12,513 received preoperative (n = 5367) or postoperative (n = 7146) radiotherapy and resection. Preoperative patients were more likely to be younger (P < .001) and histopathologically free of detectable nodal metastasis (ypN0) than postoperative (51.8% vs 31.7%, P < .001). Median total numbers of LNs (6 vs 10) and positive LNs (2 vs 3) were lower among preoperative than postoperative (P < .001 for both). OS and CSS were similar among pN0 patients. However, on proportional hazards regression, ypN+ stage was associated with an increase in relative risk for death by 21% overall (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.21; 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.35, P < .001) and 23% cancer-specific (HR = 1.23; P = .001) for preoperative compared with postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic LN status after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer is a biologic marker of prognosis. Patients who are ypN+ after preoperative are a subgroup of LN positive patients with adverse outcome. These high-risk patients should be targeted for studies of novel multidisciplinary approaches, including expanded chemo- and biologic therapies. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Authors: George J Chang; Y Nancy You; In Ja Park; Harmeet Kaur; Chung-Yuan Hu; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Randy D Ernst Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Andrea Cercek; Karyn A Goodman; Carla Hajj; Emily Weisberger; Neil H Segal; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Zsofia K Stadler; Abraham J Wu; Martin R Weiser; Philip B Paty; Jose G Guillem; Garrett M Nash; Larissa K Temple; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Leonard B Saltz Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Kyungyeon Hwang; In Ja Park; Chang Sik Yu; Seok-Byung Lim; Jong Lyul Lee; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Jin Cheon Kim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Tara E Seery; Argyrios Ziogas; Bruce S Lin; Chuan-Ju G Pan; Michael J Stamos; Jason A Zell Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: In Ja Park; Chang Sik Yu; Seok-Byung Lim; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Tae Won Kim; Jong Hoon Kim; Jin Cheon Kim Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Thilo Sprenger; Hilka Rothe; Klaus Jung; Hans Christiansen; Lena C Conradi; B Michael Ghadimi; Heinz Becker; Torsten Liersch Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Melanie Spitzner; Birte Roesler; Christian Bielfeld; Georg Emons; Jochen Gaedcke; Hendrik A Wolff; Margret Rave-Fränk; Frank Kramer; Tim Beissbarth; Julia Kitz; Jürgen Wienands; B Michael Ghadimi; Reinhard Ebner; Thomas Ried; Marian Grade Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 7.396