Literature DB >> 24219246

Top-down and bottom-up aspects of active search in a real-world environment.

Tom Foulsham1, Craig Chapman2, Eleni Nasiopoulos3, Alan Kingstone3.   

Abstract

Visual search has been studied intensively in the labouratory, but lab search often differs from search in the real world in many respects. Here, we used a mobile eye tracker to record the gaze of participants engaged in a realistic, active search task. Participants were asked to walk into a mailroom and locate a target mailbox among many similar mailboxes. This procedure allowed control of bottom-up cues (by making the target mailbox more salient; Experiment 1) and top-down instructions (by informing participants about the cue; Experiment 2). The bottom-up salience of the target had no effect on the overall time taken to search for the target, although the salient target was more likely to be fixated and found once it was within the central visual field. Top-down knowledge of target appearance had a larger effect, reducing the need for multiple head and body movements, and meaning that the target was fixated earlier and from further away. Although there remains much to be discovered in complex real-world search, this study demonstrates that principles from visual search in the labouratory influence gaze in natural behaviour, and provides a bridge between these labouratory studies and research examining vision in natural tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24219246     DOI: 10.1037/cep0000004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  15 in total

Review 1.  Control of gaze in natural environments: effects of rewards and costs, uncertainty and memory in target selection.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Jonathan Samir Matthis
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won; Khena M Swallow; Dominic M Mussack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Decisions in motion: vestibular contributions to saccadic target selection.

Authors:  L Rincon-Gonzalez; L P J Selen; K Halfwerk; M Koppen; B D Corneil; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Recentering bias for temporal saccades only: Evidence from binocular recordings of eye movements.

Authors:  Jérôme Tagu; Karine Doré-Mazars; Judith Vergne; Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Spatial scale, rather than nature of task or locomotion, modulates the spatial reference frame of attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Eye movements and hazard perception in active and passive driving.

Authors:  Andrew K Mackenzie; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-09-07

7.  The importance of search strategy for finding targets in open terrain.

Authors:  Charlotte A Riggs; Katherine Cornes; Hayward J Godwin; Simon P Liversedge; Richard Guest; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-02-20

8.  Memory shapes visual search strategies in large-scale environments.

Authors:  Chia-Ling Li; M Pilar Aivar; Matthew H Tong; Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Memory and visual search in naturalistic 2D and 3D environments.

Authors:  Chia-Ling Li; M Pilar Aivar; Dmitry M Kit; Matthew H Tong; Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Davida Teller Award Lecture 2017: What can be learned from natural behavior?

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.