Literature DB >> 24218640

The structure and evolution of cis-regulatory regions: the shavenbaby story.

David L Stern1, Nicolás Frankel.   

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a historical account of the contribution of a single line of research to our current understanding of the structure of cis-regulatory regions and the genetic basis for morphological evolution. We revisit the experiments that shed light on the evolution of larval cuticular patterns within the genus Drosophila and the evolution and structure of the shavenbaby gene. We describe the experiments that led to the discovery that multiple genetic changes in the cis-regulatory region of shavenbaby caused the loss of dorsal cuticular hairs (quaternary trichomes) in first instar larvae of Drosophila sechellia. We also discuss the experiments that showed that the convergent loss of quaternary trichomes in D. sechellia and Drosophila ezoana was generated by parallel genetic changes in orthologous enhancers of shavenbaby. We discuss the observation that multiple shavenbaby enhancers drive overlapping patterns of expression in the embryo and that these apparently redundant enhancers ensure robust shavenbaby expression and trichome morphogenesis under stressful conditions. All together, these data, collected over 13 years, provide a fundamental case study in the fields of gene regulation and morphological evolution, and highlight the importance of prolonged, detailed studies of single genes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cis-regulatory evolution; cis-regulatory structure; evolution of enhancer function; morphological change; shavenbaby gene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24218640      PMCID: PMC3826501          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  44 in total

1.  Developmental basis of limblessness and axial patterning in snakes.

Authors:  M J Cohn; C Tickle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Do large effect QTL fractionate? A case study at the maize domestication QTL teosinte branched1.

Authors:  Anthony J Studer; John F Doebley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  optix drives the repeated convergent evolution of butterfly wing pattern mimicry.

Authors:  Robert D Reed; Riccardo Papa; Arnaud Martin; Heather M Hines; Brian A Counterman; Carolina Pardo-Diaz; Chris D Jiggins; Nicola L Chamberlain; Marcus R Kronforst; Rui Chen; Georg Halder; H Frederik Nijhout; W Owen McMillan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Molecular dissection of a major gene effect on a quantitative trait: the level of alcohol dehydrogenase expression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L F Stam; C C Laurie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter.

Authors:  Matthew V Rockman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Hox genes and the diversification of insect and crustacean body plans.

Authors:  M Averof; M Akam
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mos1 transposition as a tool to engineer the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by homologous recombination.

Authors:  Valérie J P Robert; Iskra Katic; Jean-Louis Bessereau
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.608

8.  Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Annette L Parks; Kevin R Cook; Marcia Belvin; Nicholas A Dompe; Robert Fawcett; Kari Huppert; Lory R Tan; Christopher G Winter; Kevin P Bogart; Jennifer E Deal; Megan E Deal-Herr; Deanna Grant; Marie Marcinko; Wesley Y Miyazaki; Stephanie Robertson; Kenneth J Shaw; Mariano Tabios; Valentina Vysotskaia; Lora Zhao; Rachel S Andrade; Kyle A Edgar; Elizabeth Howie; Keith Killpack; Brett Milash; Amanda Norton; Doua Thao; Kellie Whittaker; Millicent A Winner; Lori Friedman; Jonathan Margolis; Matthew A Singer; Casey Kopczynski; Daniel Curtis; Thomas C Kaufman; Gregory D Plowman; Geoffrey Duyk; Helen L Francis-Lang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers.

Authors:  Nicolás Frankel; Gregory K Davis; Diego Vargas; Shu Wang; François Payre; David L Stern
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Composite effects of polymorphisms near multiple regulatory elements create a major-effect QTL.

Authors:  Ryan D Bickel; Artyom Kopp; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  The genetic causes of convergent evolution.

Authors:  David L Stern
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Evolution of transcriptional enhancers and animal diversity.

Authors:  Marcelo Rubinstein; Flávio S J de Souza
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A homeotic shift late in development drives mimetic color variation in a bumble bee.

Authors:  Li Tian; Sarthok Rasique Rahman; Briana D Ezray; Luca Franzini; James P Strange; Patrick Lhomme; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  SoxNeuro and Shavenbaby act cooperatively to shape denticles in the embryonic epidermis of Drosophila.

Authors:  Nicholas P Rizzo; Amy Bejsovec
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Complex Relationships between Chromatin Accessibility, Sequence Divergence, and Gene Expression in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Cristina M Alexandre; James R Urton; Ken Jean-Baptiste; John Huddleston; Michael W Dorrity; Josh T Cuperus; Alessandra M Sullivan; Felix Bemm; Dino Jolic; Andrej A Arsovski; Agnieszka Thompson; Jennifer L Nemhauser; Stan Fields; Detlef Weigel; Kerry L Bubb; Christin Queitsch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Disparate expression specificities coded by a shared Hox-C enhancer.

Authors:  Steve W Miller; James W Posakony
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Cis-regulatory programs in the development and evolution of vertebrate paired appendages.

Authors:  Andrew R Gehrke; Neil H Shubin
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 7.727

8.  Attenuated sensing of SHH by Ptch1 underlies evolution of bovine limbs.

Authors:  Javier Lopez-Rios; Amandine Duchesne; Dario Speziale; Guillaume Andrey; Kevin A Peterson; Philipp Germann; Erkan Unal; Jing Liu; Sandrine Floriot; Sarah Barbey; Yves Gallard; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl; Andrew D Courtney; Christophe Klopp; Sabrina Rodriguez; Robert Ivanek; Christian Beisel; Carol Wicking; Dagmar Iber; Benoit Robert; Andrew P McMahon; Denis Duboule; Rolf Zeller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Multiplex Enhancer Interference Reveals Collaborative Control of Gene Regulation by Estrogen Receptor α-Bound Enhancers.

Authors:  Julia B Carleton; Kristofer C Berrett; Jason Gertz
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 10.304

10.  DNA fragility in the parallel evolution of pelvic reduction in stickleback fish.

Authors:  Kathleen T Xie; Guliang Wang; Abbey C Thompson; Julia I Wucherpfennig; Thomas E Reimchen; Andrew D C MacColl; Dolph Schluter; Michael A Bell; Karen M Vasquez; David M Kingsley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.