Literature DB >> 14981519

Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Annette L Parks1, Kevin R Cook, Marcia Belvin, Nicholas A Dompe, Robert Fawcett, Kari Huppert, Lory R Tan, Christopher G Winter, Kevin P Bogart, Jennifer E Deal, Megan E Deal-Herr, Deanna Grant, Marie Marcinko, Wesley Y Miyazaki, Stephanie Robertson, Kenneth J Shaw, Mariano Tabios, Valentina Vysotskaia, Lora Zhao, Rachel S Andrade, Kyle A Edgar, Elizabeth Howie, Keith Killpack, Brett Milash, Amanda Norton, Doua Thao, Kellie Whittaker, Millicent A Winner, Lori Friedman, Jonathan Margolis, Matthew A Singer, Casey Kopczynski, Daniel Curtis, Thomas C Kaufman, Gregory D Plowman, Geoffrey Duyk, Helen L Francis-Lang.   

Abstract

In fruit fly research, chromosomal deletions are indispensable tools for mapping mutations, characterizing alleles and identifying interacting loci. Most widely used deletions were generated by irradiation or chemical mutagenesis. These methods are labor-intensive, generate random breakpoints and result in unwanted secondary mutations that can confound phenotypic analyses. Most of the existing deletions are large, have molecularly undefined endpoints and are maintained in genetically complex stocks. Furthermore, the existence of haplolethal or haplosterile loci makes the recovery of deletions of certain regions exceedingly difficult by traditional methods, resulting in gaps in coverage. Here we describe two methods that address these problems by providing for the systematic isolation of targeted deletions in the D. melanogaster genome. The first strategy used a P element-based technique to generate deletions that closely flank haploinsufficient genes and minimize undeleted regions. This deletion set has increased overall genomic coverage by 5-7%. The second strategy used FLP recombinase and the large array of FRT-bearing insertions described in the accompanying paper to generate 519 isogenic deletions with molecularly defined endpoints. This second deletion collection provides 56% genome coverage so far. The latter methodology enables the generation of small custom deletions with predictable endpoints throughout the genome and should make their isolation a simple and routine task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14981519     DOI: 10.1038/ng1312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  433 in total

1.  Control of Dpp morphogen signalling by a secreted feedback regulator.

Authors:  Robin Vuilleumier; Alexander Springhorn; Lucy Patterson; Stefanie Koidl; Matthias Hammerschmidt; Markus Affolter; George Pyrowolakis
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Signaling by the engulfment receptor draper: a screen in Drosophila melanogaster implicates cytoskeletal regulators, Jun N-terminal Kinase, and Yorkie.

Authors:  John F Fullard; Nicholas E Baker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Intertissue mechanical stress affects Frizzled-mediated planar cell polarity in the Drosophila notum epidermis.

Authors:  Patricio Olguín; Alvaro Glavic; Marek Mlodzik
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Mutations in TTC19 cause mitochondrial complex III deficiency and neurological impairment in humans and flies.

Authors:  Daniele Ghezzi; Paola Arzuffi; Mauro Zordan; Caterina Da Re; Costanza Lamperti; Clara Benna; Pio D'Adamo; Daria Diodato; Rodolfo Costa; Caterina Mariotti; Graziella Uziel; Cristina Smiderle; Massimo Zeviani
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Cap-n-Collar Promotes Tissue Regeneration by Regulating ROS and JNK Signaling in the Drosophila melanogaster Wing Imaginal Disc.

Authors:  Amanda R Brock; Mabel Seto; Rachel K Smith-Bolton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Nodal points and complexity of Notch-Ras signal integration.

Authors:  Gregory D Hurlbut; Mark W Kankel; Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Expression and function of scalloped during Drosophila development.

Authors:  Kirsten A Guss; Michael Benson; Nicholas Gubitosi; Karrie Brondell; Kendal Broadie; James B Skeath
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.780

8.  Synthetic lethality of retinoblastoma mutant cells in the Drosophila eye by mutation of a novel peptidyl prolyl isomerase gene.

Authors:  Kyle A Edgar; Marcia Belvin; Annette L Parks; Kellie Whittaker; Matt B Mahoney; Monique Nicoll; Christopher C Park; Christopher G Winter; Feng Chen; Kim Lickteig; Ferhad Ahmad; Hanife Esengil; Matthew V Lorenzi; Amanda Norton; Brent A Rupnow; Laleh Shayesteh; Mariano Tabios; Lynn M Young; Pamela M Carroll; Casey Kopczynski; Gregory D Plowman; Lori S Friedman; Helen L Francis-Lang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Systematic gene targeting on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nicole Beinert; Meike Werner; Gordon Dowe; Ho-Ryun Chung; Herbert Jäckle; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Mutation of a TADR protein leads to rhodopsin and Gq-dependent retinal degeneration in Drosophila.

Authors:  Lina Ni; Peiyi Guo; Keith Reddig; Mirna Mitra; Hong-Sheng Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.