Christos S Karapetis 1 , Derek Jonker , Manijeh Daneshmand , Jennifer E Hanson , Christopher J O'Callaghan , Celia Marginean , John R Zalcberg , John Simes , Malcolm J Moore , Niall C Tebbutt , Timothy J Price , Jeremy D Shapiro , Nick Pavlakis , Peter Gibbs , Guy A Van Hazel , Ursula Lee , Rashida Haq , Shakeel Virk , Dongsheng Tu , Ian A J Lorimer . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
PURPOSE: Cetuximab improves survival in patients with K-ras wild-type advanced colorectal cancer . We examined the predictive and prognostic significance of additional biomarkers in this setting, in particular BRAF, PIK3CA, and PTEN. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Available colorectal tumor samples were analyzed from the CO.17 study. BRAF mutations were identified in tumor-derived DNA by direct sequencing and PIK3CA mutations were identified using a high-resolution melting screen with confirmation by sequencing. PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on tissue microarrays. For each biomarker, prognostic and predictive effects were examined using a Cox model with tests for treatment-biomarker interaction. RESULTS: A total of 572 patients with pretreated colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive cetuximab or best supportive care (BSC ). Of 401 patients assessed for BRAF status, 13 (3.2%) had mutations. Of 407 patients assessed for PIK3CA status, 61 (15%) had mutations . Of 205 patients assessed for PTEN, 148 (72%) were negative for IHC expression . None of BRAF, PIK3CA, or PTEN was prognostic for overall or progression-free survival in the BSC arm. None was predictive of benefit from cetuximab , either in the whole study population or the K-ras wild-type subset. In the K-ras wild-type subgroup, the overall survival adjusted HR according to BRAF mutation status was 1.39 (interaction P = 0.69), PIK3CA mutation status HR = 0.79 (interaction P = 0.63), and PTEN expression HR = 0.75 (interaction P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: In chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer, neither PIK3CA mutation status nor PTEN expression were prognostic, nor were they predictive of benefit from cetuximab . Evaluation of predictive significance of BRAF mutations requires a larger sample size. ©2013 AACR.
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
PURPOSE: Cetuximab improves survival in patients with K-ras wild-type advanced colorectal cancer . We examined the predictive and prognostic significance of additional biomarkers in this setting, in particular BRAF , PIK3CA , and PTEN . EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Available colorectal tumor samples were analyzed from the CO.17 study. BRAF mutations were identified in tumor -derived DNA by direct sequencing and PIK3CA mutations were identified using a high-resolution melting screen with confirmation by sequencing. PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on tissue microarrays. For each biomarker, prognostic and predictive effects were examined using a Cox model with tests for treatment-biomarker interaction. RESULTS: A total of 572 patients with pretreated colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive cetuximab or best supportive care (BSC). Of 401 patients assessed for BRAF status, 13 (3.2%) had mutations. Of 407 patients assessed for PIK3CA status, 61 (15%) had mutations. Of 205 patients assessed for PTEN , 148 (72%) were negative for IHC expression. None of BRAF , PIK3CA , or PTEN was prognostic for overall or progression-free survival in the BSC arm. None was predictive of benefit from cetuximab , either in the whole study population or the K-ras wild-type subset. In the K-ras wild-type subgroup, the overall survival adjusted HR according to BRAF mutation status was 1.39 (interaction P = 0.69), PIK3CA mutation status HR = 0.79 (interaction P = 0.63), and PTEN expression HR = 0.75 (interaction P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: In chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer , neither PIK3CA mutation status nor PTEN expression were prognostic, nor were they predictive of benefit from cetuximab . Evaluation of predictive significance of BRAF mutations requires a larger sample size. ©2013 AACR.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Gene
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2013
PMID: 24218517 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 1078-0432 Impact factor: 12.531