Literature DB >> 24218307

A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy.

Sergio Cadoni1, Paolo Gallittu1, Stefano Sanna2, Viviana Fanari2, Maria L Porcedda2, Matteo Erriu3, Felix W Leung4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Water-aided colonoscopy includes water immersion and water exchange. Several small single-center studies have suggested that the use of water rather than air insufflation during colonoscopy reduces pain on insertion. The aim of this study was to investigate whether water-aided colonoscopy is less painful than air insufflation in a large cohort of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a two-center, randomized controlled trial. Consecutive patients who agreed to start colonoscopy without premedication were included. Sedation was administered on demand. Water-aided colonoscopy was performed using water immersion in the early phase of the study, and subsequently water exchange was used. The primary endpoint was cecal intubation with pain scores of ≤ 2 and sedation with no or ≤ 2 mg midazolam. Secondary outcomes were pain score at discharge, cecal intubation rate and time, and adenoma detection rate (ADR).
RESULTS: A total of 672 patients were randomized to water exchange (n = 338) or air insufflation (n = 334). The primary endpoint was achieved in more patients in the water exchange group (83.8 % vs. 62 %; P < 0.0005). On-demand sedation was also required less (11.5 % vs. 26.0 %; P < 0.0005) and mean pain score was lower (1.3 vs. 2.3; P < 0.0005) in the water exchange group. The cecal intubation rates were comparable. Water exchange had a significantly higher overall ADR (25.8 % vs. 19.1 %; P = 0.041), proximal ADR (10.1 % vs. 4.8 %; P = 0.014), and proximal < 10 mm ADR (7.7 % vs. 3.9 %; P = 0.046); proximal ADR was also higher in screening-only patients in the water exchange group (18.9 % vs. 7.4 %; P  = 0.015). No detailed analysis was possible for the air insufflation vs. water immersion comparison.
CONCLUSION: The current results confirmed that water exchange minimized the requirement for sedation and increased the ADR. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24218307     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1353604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  19 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial comparing water exchange and air insufflation during colonoscopy without sedation.

Authors:  Makoto Arai; Kenichiro Okimoto; Hideaki Ishigami; Takashi Taida; Arata Oyamada; Shoko Minemura; Keiko Saito; Masaru Tsuboi; Daisuke Maruoka; Tomoaki Matsumura; Tomoo Nakagawa; Tatsuro Katsuno; Kanae Mitsuhashi; Yuki Nakagawa; Kazuya Yamaguchi; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Water Exchange Method Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hui Jia; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo; Lina Zhao; Xiangping Wang; Linhui Zhang; Tao Dong; Hui Luo; Zhizheng Ge; Jun Liu; Jianyu Hao; Ping Yao; Yao Zhang; Hongyu Ren; Weizhen Zhou; Yujie Guo; Wei Zhang; Xiaolin Chen; Dayong Sun; Xiaoqiang Yang; Xiaoyu Kang; Na Liu; Zhiguo Liu; Felix Leung; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Can Technology Improve the Quality of Colonoscopy?

Authors:  Selvi Thirumurthi; William A Ross; Gottumukkala S Raju
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-07

4.  Adenoma and Advanced Adenoma Detection Rates of Water Exchange, Endocuff, and Cap Colonoscopy: A Network Meta-Analysis with Pooled Data of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Paul P Shao; Aileen Bui; Tahmineh Romero; Hui Jia; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of water-immersion colonoscopy.

Authors:  Shinya Sugimoto; Takeshi Mizukami
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Seeing better--Evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Javier Aranda-Hernández; Jason Hwang; Gabor Kandel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Water-Assisted Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sergio Cadoni; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

8.  Evidence to suggest adoption of water exchange deserves broader consideration: Its pain alleviating impact occurs in 90% of investigators.

Authors:  Sergio Cadoni; Mauro Liggi; Premysl Falt; Stefano Sanna; Mariangela Argiolas; Viviana Fanari; Paolo Gallittu; Donatella Mura; Maria L Porcedda; Vit Smajstrla; Matteo Erriu; Felix W Leung
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-25

9.  Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Authors:  Martin Floer; Erwin Biecker; Rüdiger Fitzlaff; Hermann Röming; Detlev Ameis; Achim Heinecke; Steffen Kunsch; Volker Ellenrieder; Philipp Ströbel; Michael Schepke; Tobias Meister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  What Influences the Quality of Prevention Colonoscopy?

Authors:  Wolfgang Schmidt-Tänzer; Axel Eickhoff
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.