Literature DB >> 24215269

The ecology of sexual conflict: ecologically dependent parallel evolution of male harm and female resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Devin Arbuthnott1, Emily M Dutton, Aneil F Agrawal, Howard D Rundle.   

Abstract

The prevalence of sexual conflict in nature, along with the potentially stochastic nature of the resulting coevolutionary trajectories, makes it an important driver of phenotypic divergence and speciation that can operate even in the absence of environmental differences. The majority of empirical work investigating sexual conflict's role in population divergence/speciation has therefore been done in uniform environments and any role of ecology has largely been ignored. However, theory suggests that natural selection can constrain phenotypes influenced by sexual conflict. We use replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster adapted to alternative environments to test how ecology influences the evolution of male effects on female longevity. The extent to which males reduce female longevity, as well as female resistance to such harm, both evolved in association with adaptation to the different environments. Our results demonstrate that ecology plays a central role in shaping patterns of population divergence in traits under sexual conflict.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antagonistic coevolution; ecological divergence; experimental evolution; interlocus sexual conflict; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24215269     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  19 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of sexually antagonistic phenotypes.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The effect of epistasis on sexually antagonistic genetic variation.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Nikolas Vellnow; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Using theories of sexual selection and sexual conflict to improve our understanding of plant ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Åsa Lankinen; Kristina Karlsson Green
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.276

5.  Postmating reproductive barriers contribute to the incipient sexual isolation of the United States and Caribbean Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Joyce Y Kao; Seana Lymer; Sea H Hwang; Albert Sung; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Human-caused habitat fragmentation can drive rapid divergence of male genitalia.

Authors:  Justa L Heinen-Kay; Holly G Noel; Craig A Layman; R Brian Langerhans
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Mating system manipulation and the evolution of sex-biased gene expression in Drosophila.

Authors:  Paris Veltsos; Yongxiang Fang; Andrew R Cossins; Rhonda R Snook; Michael G Ritchie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus .

Authors:  Athena D McKown; Jaroslav Klápště; Robert D Guy; Raju Y Soolanayakanahally; Jonathan La Mantia; Ilga Porth; Oleksandr Skyba; Faride Unda; Carl J Douglas; Yousry A El-Kassaby; Richard C Hamelin; Shawn D Mansfield; Quentin C B Cronk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Remating and sperm competition in replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster adapted to alternative environments.

Authors:  Devin Arbuthnott; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Divergence in sex peptide-mediated female post-mating responses in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kristina U Wensing; Claudia Fricke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.