Literature DB >> 24214548

Letter identification in relation to linguistic context and masking conditions.

E L Bjork1, W K Estes.   

Abstract

With a two-choice detection procedure, identifiability of signal letters was determined in backgrounds of words, nonword letter strings, or homogeneous noise characters. Under high performance conditions of exposure duration and pre- and postmasks, there was a substantial advantage in identifiability of letters presented alone over letters embedded in words; under low performance conditions there were generally no differences between the two types of context, but some interactive effects appeared involving particular letters with serial position and type of background. No differences were obtained between word and nonword contexts. The disparities between these findings and those reported by Reicher (1969) and Wheeler (1970) may be related to the more complete elimination under the present procedures of effects of redundancy on response selection.

Year:  1973        PMID: 24214548     DOI: 10.3758/BF03198099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  5 in total

1.  Visual information and redundancy in reading.

Authors:  M C Thompson; D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-04

2.  On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli.

Authors:  M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Selective forward masking.

Authors:  P M Merikle; M Coltheart
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1972-09

4.  Rate of information processing in visual perception: some results and methodological considerations.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; T Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-02

5.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-08
  5 in total
  12 in total

1.  The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

2.  The word superiority effect: Dependence on short-term memory factors.

Authors:  I B Appelman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-03

3.  Three interrelated problems in reading: A review.

Authors:  J L Bradshaw
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-03

4.  When are nonwords easy to see?

Authors:  G C Gilmore; H E Egeth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-09

5.  The word-detection effect: sophisticated guessing or perceptual enhancement?

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; C E Lyon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-05

6.  Evidence for processing of constituent singleand multiletter codes: Support for multilevel coding in word perception.

Authors:  Seth N Greenberg; Frank R Vellutino
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02-28

7.  Discriminability and bias in the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  W K Estes; J L Brunn
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-11

8.  The word without the tachistoscope.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; B Silvers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

9.  Visual angle and the word superiority effect.

Authors:  D G Purcell; K E Stanovich; A Spector
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1978-01

10.  Phonological and orthographic factors in the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.