Literature DB >> 21286976

When are nonwords easy to see?

G C Gilmore1, H E Egeth.   

Abstract

The influences of presentation mode (mixed vs. blocked trials) and target variability on the detection of targets in words and in random letter strings were examined. The results indicated that there was a substantial word superiority effect in mixed lists of words and nonwords, but that this effect was eliminated when pure lists of words and nonwords were compared. Also, target variability affected the shape of the serial position curve. When subjects searched repeatedly for a single target, the serial position curve had only a significant linear component. However, when the identity of the target varied from trial to trial, the serial position curve had a significant quartic component (i.e.. it was M-shaped). These results were interpreted in terms of strategies and feature learning.

Year:  1976        PMID: 21286976     DOI: 10.3758/BF03213213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  5 in total

1.  Letter identification in relation to linguistic context and masking conditions.

Authors:  E L Bjork; W K Estes
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-09

2.  Perception of letters, words, and nonwords.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-10

3.  Sequential dependencies in letter search.

Authors:  C T James; D E Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-07

4.  Search time in a redundant visual display.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-03

5.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-08
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Back to basics: The effects of block vs. interleaved trial administration on pro- and anti-saccade performance.

Authors:  Liran Zeligman; Ari Z Zivotofsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.