PURPOSE: To compare quantification of the amide proton transfer (APT) effect pre- and post-gadolinium contrast agent (Gd) administration in order to establish to what extent Gd alters quantification of the APT effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients with internal carotid stenosis were recruited. APT imaging was acquired pre- and post-contrast in two sessions (before and after surgery) to assess the extent of relaxation time, T1 , change on APT effect calculated using magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry analysis at offsets of ±3.5 ppm relative to water resonance. Statistical and modeling evaluations were performed on the pre- and post-contrast APT effect to study the sensitivity to contrast administration. RESULTS: Before surgery, the post-contrast T1 was estimated to drop <10% of the pre-value for the majority of the patients. After surgery, higher post-contrast T1 reductions were observed in all the patients (maximum decrease was about 20% of the pre-value). Consistent differences between pre- and post-contrast were seen in the APT effect quantified using the asymmetry measure in most regions of the brain, with significant differences found in the white matter at the group level and in 25% of the individual patient results. CONCLUSION: APT imaging should be performed prior to Gd administration to avoid potential misinterpretation of the APT effect.
PURPOSE: To compare quantification of the amide proton transfer (APT) effect pre- and post-gadolinium contrast agent (Gd) administration in order to establish to what extent Gd alters quantification of the APT effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients with internal carotid stenosis were recruited. APT imaging was acquired pre- and post-contrast in two sessions (before and after surgery) to assess the extent of relaxation time, T1 , change on APT effect calculated using magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry analysis at offsets of ±3.5 ppm relative to water resonance. Statistical and modeling evaluations were performed on the pre- and post-contrast APT effect to study the sensitivity to contrast administration. RESULTS: Before surgery, the post-contrast T1 was estimated to drop <10% of the pre-value for the majority of the patients. After surgery, higher post-contrast T1 reductions were observed in all the patients (maximum decrease was about 20% of the pre-value). Consistent differences between pre- and post-contrast were seen in the APT effect quantified using the asymmetry measure in most regions of the brain, with significant differences found in the white matter at the group level and in 25% of the individual patient results. CONCLUSION: APT imaging should be performed prior to Gd administration to avoid potential misinterpretation of the APT effect.
Keywords:
amide proton transfer (APT) imaging; chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging; gadolinium contrast agents; magnetization transfer (MT) imaging
Authors: Craig K Jones; Daniel Polders; Jun Hua; He Zhu; Hans J Hoogduin; Jinyuan Zhou; Peter Luijten; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hua Li; Ke Li; Xiao-Yong Zhang; Xiaoyu Jiang; Zhongliang Zu; Moritz Zaiss; Daniel F Gochberg; John C Gore; Junzhong Xu Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Lee Sze Foo; George Harston; Amit Mehndiratta; Wun-She Yap; Yan Chai Hum; Khin Wee Lai; Shahizon Azura Mohamed Mukari; Faizah Mohd Zaki; Yee Kai Tee Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2021-08
Authors: Y K Tee; G W J Harston; N Blockley; Thomas W Okell; J Levman; F Sheerin; M Cellerini; P Jezzard; J Kennedy; S J Payne; M A Chappell Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 4.044